De Se Ipsum Citra Invidiam Laudando

Plutarch

Plutarch. Plutarch's Morals, Vol. II. Goodwin, William W., editor; Lancaster, P., translator. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company; Cambridge: Press of John Wilson and Son, 1874.

Now talking after an high and glorious manner proves advantageous, not only to persons in danger of the law or such like eminent distress, but to those also who are clouded in a dull series of misfortunes; and that more properly than when they appear splendid in the world. For what addition can words make to those who already seem possessed of real glory, and do lie indulging and basking in her beams? But those who at present are incapable of ambition, if they express themselves loftily, seem only to bear up against the storms of Fortune, to undergird the greatness of their souls, and to shun that pity and commiseration which supposes a shipwrecked and forlorn condition. As therefore those who in walking affect a stiffness of body and a stretched-out neck are accounted effeminate and foppish, but are commended if in fencing and fighting they keep themselves erect and steady; so the man grappling with ill fortune, if he raise himself to resist her,

Like some stout boxer, ready with his blow,[*](Soph. Trachin. 442.)
and by a bravery of speech transform himself from abject and miserable to bold and noble, is not to be censured as obstinate and audacious, but honored as invincible and great. So, although Homer described Patroclus in the happinesses of his life as smooth and without envy, yet in death he makes him have something of the bravo, and a soldier’s gallant roughness:
  • Had twenty mortals, each thy match in might,
  • Opposed me fairly, they had sunk in fight.
  • [*](II. XVI. 847.)
    So Phocion, though otherwise very mild, after the sentence passed on him, showed the greatness of his mind in many respects; particularly to one of his fellow-sufferers, who miserably cried out and bewailed his misfortune, What, says he, is it not a pleasure to thee to die with Phocion?

    Further, a man of state has not less but greater liberty to speak any thing of himself when his merits are rewarded with injurious and unkind returns. Achilles usually gave the Gods their glory, and spoke modestly in this manner:

  • Whene’er, by Jove’s decree, our conquering powers
  • Shall humble to the dust Troy’s lofty towers.
  • But when he was unhandsomely reproached and aspersed with contumelies, he added swelling words to his anger, and these in his own applause:
    I sacked twelve ample cities on the main;
    and also these:
  • It was not thus, when, at my sight amazed,
  • Troy saw and trembled, as this helmet blazed.
  • [*](II. I. 128; IX. 328; XVI. 70.)
    For apologies claim a great liberty of speech and boasting, as considerable parts of their defence.

    Themistocles also, having been guilty of nothing distasteful

    either in his words or actions, yet perceiving the Athenians glutted with him and beginning to neglect him, forbore not to say: Why, O ye happy people, do ye weary out yourselves by still receiving benefits from the same hands? Upon every storm you fly to the same tree for shelter; yet, when it is fair again, you despoil it of its leaves as you go away.