Vitae philosophorum

Diogenes Laertius

Diogenes Laertius. Hicks, R. D., editor. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press; London: William Heinemann Ltd., 1925.

  • Correspondence concerning Empedocles, in twenty-two books.
  • Of Mathematics.
  • Against Plato.
  • Against Aristotle.

    He died of paralysis, but not till he had given full proof of his ability.

    And then there is Leonteus of Lampsacus and his wife Themista, to whom Epicurus wrote letters; further, Colotes[*](Colotes, a great admirer of the master, wrote a work to prove that life is impossible by the rules of any other philosophy. Plutarch wrote a tract against him: Πρὸς Κολώτην 1107 e-1127; and also a rejoinder entitled, Οὐδὲ ζῆν ἔστιν ἡδέως κατʼ Ἐπίκουρον, to prove that even a pleasurable life is unattainable on the principles of Epicurus.) and Idomeneus, who were also natives of Lampsacus. All these were distinguished, and with them Polystratus, the successor of Hermarchus; he was succeeded by Dionysius, and he by Basilides. Apollodorus, known as the tyrant of the garden, who wrote over four hundred books, is

    V2_555
    also famous; and the two Ptolemaei of Alexandria, the one black and the other white; and Zeno[*](Cf. Cic. Ac. Post. 146; N.D. i. 59.) of Sidon, the pupil of Apollodorus, a voluminous author;

  • and Demetrius,[*](Cf. Sext. Emp. Adv. math. viii. 348 sqq.; Strabo, xiv. 658.) who was called the Laconian; and Diogenes of Tarsus, who compiled the select lectures; and Orion, and others whom the genuine Epicureans call Sophists.

    There were three other men who bore the name of Epicurus: one the son of Leonteus and Themista; another a Magnesian by birth; and a third, a drillsergeant.

    Epicurus was a most prolific author and eclipsed all before him in the number of his writings: for they amount to about three hundred rolls, and contain not a single citation from other authors; it is Epicurus himself who speaks throughout. Chrysippus tried to outdo him in authorship according to Carneades, who therefore calls him the literary parasite of Epicurus. For every subject treated by Epicurus, Chrysippus in his contentiousness must treat at equal length;