De parasito sive artem esse parasiticam

Lucian of Samosata

Lucian, Vol. 3. Harmon, A. M., editor. London: William Heinemann, Ltd.; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1921.

TYCHIADES Why in the world is it, Simon, that while other men, both slave and free, each know some art by which they are of use to themselves and to someone else, you apparently have no work which would enable you to make any profit yourself or give away anything to anybody else?

SIMON What do you mean by that question, Tychiades ? I do not understand. Try to put it more clearly.

TYCHIADES Is there any art that you happen to know? Music, for instance? °

SIMON No, indeed.

TYCHIADES Well, medicine ?

SIMON Not that, either.

TYCHIADES Geometry, then?

SIMON Not by any means.

v.3.p.239
Well, rhetoric? For as to philosophy, you are as remote from that as vice itself is!

SIMON Indeed, even more so, if possible. So don’t suppose you have touched me with that taunt, as if I did not know it. I admit that I am vicious, and worse than you think!

TYCHIADES Quite so. Well, it may be that although you have not learned those arts because of their magnitude and difficulty, you have learned one of the vulgar arts like carpentry or shoemaking; you are not so well off in every way as not to need even such an art.

SIMON You are right, Tychiades ; but I am not acquainted with any of these either.

TYCHIADES What other art, then?

SIMON What other? A fine one, I think. If you knew about it, I believe you would speak highly of it too. In practice, I claim to be successful at it already, but whether you will find me so in theory also I can't say.

TYCHIADES What is it?

SIMON I do not feel that I have yet thoroughly mastered the literature on that subject. So for the present

v.3.p.241
you may know that I possess an art and need not be dissatisfied with me on that score ; some other day you shall hear what art it is.

TYCHIADES But I can’t wait.

SIMON The nature of the art will perhaps seem extraordinary when you hear it.

TYCHIADES Tr aly, that is just why I am keen to know about it.

SIMON ‘Some other day, Tychiades.

TYCHIADES Oh, no! Tell me now—unless you are ashamed !

SIMON Parasitic.

TYCHIADES Really, would anyone who was not insane call that an art, Simon?

SIMON I do; and if you think I am insane, think also that my insanity is the reason for my not knowing any other art and acquit me of your charges at once. They say, you know, that this malign spirit, cruel in all else to those whom she inhabits, at least secures them remission of their sins, like a schoolmaster or a tutor, by taking the blame for them upon herself. ~

TYCHIADES Well then, Simon, Parasitic is an art ?

v.3.p.243
SIMON Indeed it is, and I am a craftsman in it.[*](In the word δημιουργός there is an allusion to the definition of Rhetoric as Πειθοῦς δημιουργός. ) TYCHIADES Then you are a parasite ?

SIMON That was a cruel thrust, Tychiades !

TYCHIADES But do not you blush to call yourself a parasite ?

SIMON Not at all; I should be ashamed not to speak it out.

TYCHIADES Then, by Zeus, when we wish to tell about you to someone who does not know you, when he wants to find out about you, of course we shall be correct in referring to you as “the parasite”?

SIMON Far more correct in referring to me so than in referring to Phidias as a sculptor, for I take quite as much joy in my art as Phidias did in his Zeus.

TYCHIADES I say, here is a point; as I think of it, a gale of laughter has come over me!

SIMON What is it?

TYCHIADES What if we should address you in due form at the top of our letters as “Simon the Parasite”!

v.3.p.245
SIMON Why, you would do me greater pleasure than you would Dion by addressing him as “the Philosopher.”[*](Dion of Syracuse, the friend of Plato. )

TYCHIADES Well, how it pleases you to be styled matters little or nothing to me; but you must consider the general absurdity of it.

SIMON What absurdity, I should like to know?

TYCHIADES If we are to list this among the other arts, so that when anybody enquires what art it is, we shall say “Parasitic,” to correspond with Music and Rhetoric.[*](The examples in the Greek are “Grammar and Medicine,” but it was necessary to choose English examples which retained the Greek ending. ) SIMON For my part, Tychiades, I should call this an art far more than any other. If you care to listen, I think I can tell you why, although, as I just said, I am not entirely prepared for it. TYCHIADES It will make no difference at all if you say little, as long as that little is true.

SIMON Come now, first of all, if it please you, let us consider what an art is in general; for in that way we can go on to the individual] arts and see if they truly come under that head.

v.3.p.247
TYCHIADES What on earth is an art, then? Surely you know.

SIMON To be sure.

TYCHIADES Then do not hesitate to tell, if you do know.

SIMON An art, I remember to have heard a learned man say,[*](The particular learned man who said it first is not known to us. It is the orthodox Stoic definition, quoted repeatedly by Sextus Empiricus. Cf. Quint. 2,17, 41: ille ab omnibus fere probatus finis ... artem constare ex perceptionibus consentientibus et coexercitatis ad finem utilem vitae. ) is a complex of knowledges exercised in combination to some end useful to the world.

TYCHIADES He was quite right in what he said, and you in your recollection of it.

SIMON If Parasitic satisfies this definition completely, what other conclusion could there be than that it is an art?

TYCHIADES It would be an art, of course, if it should really be like that.

SIMON Now then, let us apply to Parasitic the individual characteristics of an art and see whether it is in harmony with them or whether its theory, like a good-for-nothing pot when you try its ring, sounds cracked.[*](Just so Critolaus had tested rhetoric and found it wanting : see Philodemus, Rhetoric 2; Sextus, Agatnet the Rhetortcrans; and Quintilian 2, 17. ) Every art, then, must be a complex of

v.3.p.249
knowledges ; and of these, in the case of the para site, first of all there is testing and deciding who would be suitable to support him, and whom he could begin to cultivate without being sorry for it later. Or do we care to maintain that assayers possess an art because they know how to distinguish between coins that are counterfeit and those that are not, but parasites discriminate without art between men that are counterfeit and those that are good, even though men are not distinguishable at once, like coins? Wise Euripides criticizes this very point when he Says:
  1. In men, no mark whereby to tell the knave
  2. Did ever yet upon his body grow.
Euripides, Medea518. This makes the parasite’s art even greater, since it is better than divination at distinguishing and recognising things so obscure and hidden.

As for knowing how to talk appropriately and to act in such a way as to become intimate and show himself extremely devoted to his patron, do not you think that this shows intelligence and highlydeveloped knowledge?

TYCHIADES Yes, indeed.

SIMON And at banquets, to go away with more than anybody else, enjoying greater favour than those who do not possess the same art—-do you think that can be managed without some degree of theory and wisdom ?

v.3.p.251
TYCHIADES Not by any means.

SIMON What about knowing the merits and defects of bake-stuffs and made dishes? Does that seem to you matter for an untrained man’s bumptious inquisitiveness? Yet excellent Plato says:

When a man is about to partake of a banquet, if he be not versed in the art of cookery, his opinion of the feast in preparation is something deficient in weight.
Plato, Theaetetus178D.

That Parasitic is based not only on knowledge, but on exercised knowledge, you may readily assure yourself from this fact: the knowledges that belong to the other arts often remain unexercised for days and nights and months and years, and yet the arts are not lost to those who possess them ; but if the . parasite’s knowledge is not in exercise daily, not only the art, I take it, but the artist himself, is lost thereby !

And as to its being “directed to some end. useful to the world,” it would be crazy, don’t you think, to investigate that point. I, for my part, cannot discover that anything in the world is more useful than eating and drinking, and in fact without them it is impossible to live at all !

TYCHIADES Quite so.

SIMON Again, Parasitic is not the same sort of thing as beauty and strength, so as to be considered a gift,. like them, rather than an art.[*](Again a thrust at Rhetoric, which some considered “vis tantum” ; cf. Quintilian 2, 15, 2. )

v.3.p.253
TYCHIADES You are right.

SIMON But on the other hand, it is not want of art; for want of art never achieves anything for its possessor.[*](Rhetoric is a want of art: cf. § 27, and Quint. 2, 15, 2. ) For example, if you should put yourself in command of a ship at sea in a storm without knowing how to steer, should you come safely through ?

TYCHIADES Not by any means.

SIMON How about a man who should take horses in hand without knowing how to drive?

TYCHIADES He would not come through, either.

SIMON Why, pray, except because he does not possess the art by which he would be able to save himself?

TYCHIADES To be sure.

SIMON Then the parasite would not be saved by Parasitic if it were want of art? TY CHIADES True.

SIMON Then it is art that saves him, and not want of art ?

TYCHIADES Quite so.

v.3.p.255
SIMON Then Parasitic is an art ?

TYCHIADES It is, apparently.

SIMON I assure you I know of many instances when good helmsmen have been wrecked and expert drivers thrown from their seats, and some had _ broken bones, while others were completely done for; but nobody can cite any such mishap in the case of a parasite. Then if Parasitic is not want of art and not a gift, but a complex of knowledges exercised in combination, evidently we have reached an agreement to-day that it is an art.

TYCHIADES As far as I can judge from what has been said. But wait a bit: give us a first-class definition of Parasitic.

SIMON Right. It seems to me that the definition might best be expressed’ thus: Parasitic is that art which is concerned with food and drink and what must be said and done to obtain them, and its end is pleasure.

TYCHIADES That, to my mind, is a tip-top definition of your art; but look out that you do not get into conflict with some of the philosophers over the end.[*](With the Epicureans, who claimed the same summum bonum, and the Stoics, who rejected it. The Stoics are met tirst, with the argument that not virtue but Parasitic is the consummation of happiness. The sense of τέλος shifts slightly, to prepare for its use in the citation from Homer. )

v.3.p.257
SIMON It will be quite sufficient if I can show that happiness and Parasitic have the same end, and that will be plain from this:

wise Homer, admiring the life of a parasite on the ground that it alone is blessed and enviable, says:

  1. I for my own part hold that there is no end more delightful
  2. Than when cheerfulness reigneth supreme over all of the people ;
  3. Banqueters down the long halls give ear to the bard as he singeth,
  4. Sitting in regular order, and by each man is a table
  5. Laden with bread and with meat; while the server from out of the great bowl
  6. Dippeth the mead, and beareth and poureth it into the beakers.
Odyssey9, 5 ff. And as if this were not enough to express his admiration, he makes his own opinion more evident, rightly saying :—
  1. This is a thing that to me in my heart doth seem very goodly.
Odyssey9, 11. From what he says, he counts nothing else happy but to be a parasite. And it was no ordinary man to whom he ascribed these words, but the wisest of them all. After all, if Odysseus had wished to commend the Stoic end, he could have said so when he brought Philoctetes back from Lemnos, when he sacked Troy, when he checked the Greeks in their flight, when he entered Troy after flogging himself and putting on wretched Stoic rags; but on those
v.3.p.259
occasions he did not call that a more delightful end ! Moreover, after he had entered into the Epicurean life once more in Calypso’s isle, when he had it in his power to live in idleness and luxury, to dally with the daughter of Atlas, and to enjoy every pleasurable emotion, even then he did not call that end more delightful, but the life of a parasite, who at that time was called a banqueter. What does he say, then? It is worth while to cite his verses once more, for there is nothing like hearing them said over and over: “banqueters sitting in regular order,” and:
  1. by each man is a table
  2. Laden with bread and with meat.

As to Epicurus, quite shamelessly filching the end of Parasitic, he makes it the end of his conception of happiness. That the thing is plagiarism, and that pleasure does not concern Epicurus at all, but does concern the parasite, you can assure yourself from this line of reasoning. I for'my part consider that pleasure is first of all the freedom of the flesh from discomfort, and secondly, not having the spirit full of turbulence and commotion. Now then, each of these things is attained by the parasite, but neither by Epicurus. For with his inquiries about the shape of the earth, the infinitude of the universe, the magnitude of the sun, distances in space, primal elements, and whether the gods exist or not, and with his continual strife and bickering with certain persons about the end itself, he is involved not only in the troubles

v.3.p.261
of man but in those of the universe. The parasite, however, thinking that everything is all right and thoroughly convinced it would not be any better if it were other than as it is, eats and sleeps in great peace and comfort, with nothing of that sort annoying him, flat on his back, with his arms and legs flung out, like Odysseus sailing home from Scheria.[*](Cf. Odyssey13, 79, and92. )

Again, it is not only in this way that pleasure is foreign to Kpicurus, but in another way. This Epicurus, whoever the learned gentleman is, either has or has not his daily bread. Now if he has not, it is not a question of living a life of pleasure; he will not even live! But if he has, he gets it either from his own larder or that of someone else. Now if he gets his daily bread from someone else, he is a parasite and not what he calls himself; but if he gets it from his own larder, he will not lead a life of pleasure.

TYCHIADES Why not?

SIMON If he gets his daily bread from his own larder, many are the unpleasantnesses which must needs attend such a life, Tychiades! Just see how many! A man who intends to shape his life by pleasure should satisfy all the desires that arise in him. What do you say to that?

TYCHIADES I agree with you.

SIMON Therefore the man of vast means no doubt has the opportunity of doing so, while the man of little or no means has not; consequently a poor

v.3.p.263
man cannot become an adept or attain the end, that is to say, pleasure. Even the rich man, however, . who through his wealth ministers lavishly to his © desires, cannot attain that. Why? Because quite inevitably, when a man spends his money, he becomes involved in many an unpleasantness, at one moment quarrelling with his cook for preparing the meat badly—or else if he does not quarrel, eating poor food on that account and coming short of his pleasure—and the next moment quarrelling with the man who manages his household affairs, if he does not manage them well. Is not that so?

TYCHIADES Yes, by Zeus, I agree with you.

SIMON Now Epicurus is likely to have all this happen to him, so that he will never reach the end. But the parasite has no cook with whom to lose his temper, nor lands nor house nor money over the loss of which to be vexed, so that he alone can eat and drink without being annoyed by any of the matters which inevitably annoy the rich.

That Parasitic is an art has been well enough demonstrated by means of this argument and the others. It remains to show that it is the best art, and not simply this, but first that it excels all the other arts put together, and then that it excels each of them individually.

It excels all put together for this reason. Every art has to be prefaced by study, hardships, fear and

v.3.p.265
floggings, from which everyone would pray to be delivered. But this art alone, it seems, can be learned without hardships. Who ever went home from a dinner in tears, as we see.some going home from their schools? Who ever set out for a dinner looking gloomy, like those who go to school? I promise you, the parasite goes to dinner of his own accord, with a right good will to exercise his art, while those who are learning the other arts hate them so much that some run away from home on account of them !

Again, should you not note that when pupils make progress in those arts, their fathers and mothers give them as special rewards what they give the parasite every day? ‘“By Zeus, the boy has written nicely,” they say; “give him something to eat!”’ “He has not written correctly; don’t give him anything!” So highly is the thing esteemed, both as a reward and by way of punishment.

Again, the other arts attain to this end late, reaping their harvest of pleasure only after their apprenticeship; for “the road to them leadeth uphill’ and is long.[*](The quotation is from Hesiod, Works and Days290, and refers to the road that leads to virtue. The scholasticus, the grey-headed student, was a familiar figure; see Lucian’s Hermotimus. ) Parasitic alone of them all derives profit from the art immediately, in the apprenticeship itself, and no sooner does it begin than it is at its end.

Moreover, the other arts, not merely in certain cases but in every case, have come into existence to provide support and nothing else, while the parasite has his support immediately, as soon as he enters upon his art. Do not you see that while the farmer

v.3.p.267
does not farm for the sake of farming, nor the builder build for the sake of building, the parasite does not aim at something different; his work and its object are one and the same thing.

Everybody knows, too, that those who ply the rest of the arts drudge all the time except one or two days a month which they celebrate as holidays,[*](The manuscripts add: “and the cities too hold some feasts once a year and others once a month.” ) and are said to have their good time then. But the parasite celebrates thirty holidays a month, for he thinks that every day belongs to the gods.

Furthermore, those who wish to be successful in the other arts eat little and drink little, like invalids, and it is impossible to learn them while one is rejoicing the inner man with plenty of food and plenty of wine.

The other arts, moreover, cannot be of use to their possessor without tools, for it is impossible to pipe without a pipe or to strum without a lyre or to ride without a horse ; but this one is so genial and presents so little difficulty to the artisan that even one who has no tools can follow it.

And we pay, it is likely, for our lessons in the other arts, but get paid in this one.

Besides, the other arts have teachers, but Parasitic has none; like the Art of Poetry according to the definition of Socrates, it comes by some divine dispensation.[*](Plato, Ion 534 B-c. )

Reflect, too, that we cannot exercise the other arts

v.3.p.269
while on a journey or a voyage, but this one can be plied both on the road and at sea.