<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:Z.zacharias_2</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:Z.zacharias_2</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="Z"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="zacharias-bio-2" n="zacharias_2"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Zacharias</surname></persName></head><p>2. The preceding should no doubt be distinguished from Zacharias surnamed Scholasticus.</p><p>The latter studied philosophy at Alexandria, and jutrisprudence at Berytus. After some time
      he was made bishop of Mytilene in Lesbos, and while in this office was present at the council
      held at Constantinople in <date when-custom="536">A. D. 536</date>, in the Acta of which he is
      several times mentioned.</p><div><head>Works</head><div><head>The <title>Ammonius</title>, an anti-platonic dialogue</head><p>There is still extant a work by Zacharias. entitled <title xml:lang="grc">Ἀμμώνιος</title>. It professed to be a dialogue held with a disciple of Ammonius, and
        to contain the substance of a discussion held at Alexandria with Ammonius himself and one
        Gessius, a physician. The design of the work is to refute the favourite Platonic doctrine of
        the eternity of the universe. (<foreign xml:lang="grc">Ὅτι οὐ συναΐδιος τῷ θεῷ
         ὁ κόσμος</foreign>, <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀλλὰ δημιούργημα αὐτοῦ
         τυγχάνει</foreign>), and the occasion which led to its composition was the endeavour of a
        disciple of Ammonius who had come to Berytus to spread that doctrine, so inimical to the
        Christian faith. The style of Zacharias is formed very much in imitation of that of
        Plato.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>This dialogue was published in Greek and Latin by J. Tarin, in connection with the
          Philocalia of Origenes (Paris, 1619).</bibl><bibl>It is also to be found in K. Barth's edition of Aeneas of Gaza (Leipzig,
          1655).</bibl></p></div></div><div><head><foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἀντίρ̀ῥησις Ζαχαρίου, ἐπισκόπου Μιτυλήνης, τὸν
         παραλογισμὸν τοῦ Μανιχαίου διελέγχουσα</foreign></head><p>There is also extant a short piece by Zacharias, entitled <title xml:lang="grc">Ἀντίρ̀ῥησις Ζαχαρίου, ἐπισκόπου Μιτυλήνης, τὸν παραλογισμὸν τοῦ Μανιχαίου
         διελέγχουσα</title>.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p>The Greek text has not been printed, but there is <bibl>a Latin translation of it by F.
          Turrianus in H. Canisii <hi rend="ital">Thesaur. Mon. Eccles. et Hist.</hi> Antv. 1725,
          vol. v. p. 428.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>Commentaries on Aristole&gt;</head><p>Zacharias is also mentioned as having written commentaries on Aristotle.</p></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p><hi rend="ital">Cod. Bibl. Coislin. ;</hi> comp. Montfauc. p. 598.</p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>