<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:X.xenocrates_6</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:X.xenocrates_6</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="X"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="xenocrates-bio-6" n="xenocrates_6"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Xeno'crates</surname></persName></head><p>3. Another philosopher, who wrote a very indifferent elegiac poem; which gives Diogenes
      occasion to remark that, when poets apply themselves to prose composition, they succeed, but
      when prose writers attempt poetry, they fail; since the one endowment comes from nature, the
      other from art. Many examples might be cited to confirm this observation; but there are some
      instances against it : for example, the prose of Virgil is said to have been as much inferior
      to his poetry, as the poetry of Cicero was to his prose. (Menag. <hi rend="ital">ad
      loc.</hi>)</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>