<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:U.vincentius_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:U.vincentius_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="U"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="vincentius-bio-1" n="vincentius_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Vince'ntius</surname></persName> or <persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Vince'ntius</surname><addName full="yes">Lirinensis</addName></persName></head><p>surnamed LIRINENSIS, from the celebrated monastery in the island of Lerins, where he
      officiated as a presbyter, was by birth a native of Gaul.</p><p>We are not acquainted with any particulars regarding his career, except that he died in the
      reign of Theodosius and Valentinian, about <date when-custom="450">A. D. 450</date>.</p><div><head>Works</head><div><head><title xml:lang="la">Commonitorium pro Catholicae fidei antiquitate et universitate
         adversus profanas omnium Haereticorum novitates</title></head><p>Vincentius' fame rests upon a treatise against heretics, composed, as we are told in the
        body of the work itself, three years after the council of Ephesus, that is, in <date when-custom="434">A. D. 434</date>. It commonly bears the title <title xml:lang="la">Commonitorium pro Catholicae fidei antiquitate et universitate adversus profanas omnium
         Haereticorum novitates,</title> but according to Gennadius, when first published, it did
        not exhibit the name of the writer, and was designated <quote xml:lang="la">Peregrini<note xml:lang="en" place="margin" anchored="true">i. e. the Pilgrim</note> adversus Haereticos.</quote> We are farther told
        that it was originally divided into two parts, but that the second of these having been
        stolen from the repositories of the author, he contented himself with briefly recapitulating
        the substance of what it had contained, and gave his work to the world in one book.</p><p>The great aim of <pb n="1261"/> this production, which is composed in a very lively and
        impressive style, is in the first place to collect the opinions of the early fathers on the
        points which had given rise to the most important doctrinal controversies ; and, in the
        second place, to establish some rule by which error may be detected and avoided, and the
        true faith maintained in purity. He determines that the means for accomplishing this object
        are two-fold : 1. The authority of Holy Scripture. 2. The tradition of the Catholic church,
        the latter being indispensable for the right understanding of the former. We are to hold
        that as a Catholic tradition, which has been believed in the Catholic church everywhere,
        always, and by all (<hi rend="ital">quod ubique, quod semper, quod ab omnibus creditum
         est</hi>), thus obtaining universality, antiquity and consent.</p><p>The <title>Commonitorium,</title> being the first work on which the proposition, which now
        forms the broad line of demarcation between the Protestant and Roman churches, is broadly
        and distinctly affirmed, it has always been regarded with great interest and studied with
        much care, while the opinions formed with regard to its merits have depended, in a great
        measure, on the theological predilections of its critics. The charge of Semi-Pelagianism
        frequently urged against Vincentius seems altogether unfounded, and indeed probably
        originated in the erroneous belief that Vincent of Lerins was the author of the tract first
        published by Sirmond (4to. Paris, 1643), entitled <title>Praedestinatus</title> s. <hi rend="ital">Praedestinatorum Haeresis et libri S. Augustino temere adscripti
         Refutatio,</hi> and also of the attack upon the tenets of Augustine known to us only from
        the reply of Prosper, <hi rend="ital">Pro Augustini Doctrina Responsiones ad capitula
         objectionum Vincentianarum.</hi></p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>The Commonitorium was first printed in the <hi rend="ital">Antidotum contra
           diversas omnium fere saeculorum Haereses</hi> of Jo. Sichardus, fol. Basil. 1528</bibl>,
         and has, since that period, been <bibl>very frequently republished both in a separate form,
          and in all the larger collections of the Fathers.</bibl><bibl>The standard edition is that of Baluzius, 8vo. Paris, 1663, 1669, 1684</bibl>, and
          <bibl>the last of these is followed by Galland, in his <title xml:lang="la">Bibliotheca
           Patrum,</title> vol. x. p. 103, fol. Venet. 1774.</bibl></p><p><bibl>The most recent edition is that of Klüpfel, 8vo. Vienn. 1809, which deserves
          to be consulted.</bibl></p></div></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Gennadius, <hi rend="ital">de Viris Illustr.</hi> 64; Trithemius, <hi rend="ital">de
        Scriptt. Eccles.</hi> 145; Schoenemann, <hi rend="ital">Biblioth. Patrum, Lat.</hi> vol.
       2.37; Bähr, <hi rend="ital">Geschicht. der Römisch. Litterat.</hi> Suppl. Band. 2te
       Abtheil. § 154. Consult also the historians of Semipelagianism [<hi rend="smallcaps">Cassianus</hi>] and the Prolegomena of Galland and Klüpfel.</p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.W.R">W.R</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>