<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:U.victor_publius_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:U.victor_publius_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="U"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="victor-publius-bio-1" n="victor_publius_1"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><addName full="yes">Vi'ctor</addName>,
        <surname full="yes">Pu'blius</surname></persName></label></head><div><head>Works</head><div><head><title xml:lang="la">De Regionibus Urbis Romae</title></head><p>the name prefixed to an enumeration of the principal buildings and monuments of ancient
        Rome, distributed according to the regions of Augustus, which has generally been respected
        as a work of great authority by Italian local antiquaries, from Nardini downwards. Bunsen,
        however, in his <title xml:lang="la">Beschreibung der Stadt Rom</title> (vol. i. p. 173,
        8vo. Stutt. 1830), after a careful examination into the history of this tract and of the
        similar production ascribed to <hi rend="smallcaps">SEXTUS</hi>
        <hi rend="smallcaps">RUFUS</hi>, has arrived at the conclusion that, in their present state,
        they cannot be received as ancient at all, but must be regarded as mere pieces of patchwork
        fabricated not earlier than the fifteenth century. To this opinion Becker in his <title xml:lang="la">Handbuch der Römischen Alterthümer</title> fully subscribes, and
        does not hesitate to characterise them as wilful impostures. (Consult the excellent papers
        on the Topography of Rome by E. II. Bunbury, published in the <hi rend="ital">Classical
         Museum,</hi> and especially the remarks in No. X. p. 328.)</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>The <title xml:lang="la">De Regionibus Urbis Romae,</title> as this production is
          usually entitled, was first printed by Joannes de Tridino, at Venice, 4to. 1505, in a
          volume containing also <title xml:lang="la">Beda de Temporibus</title></bibl>; <bibl>it
          will be found under its best form in the <title>Thesaurus Antiquitatum Romanarum</title>
          of Graevius, vol. iii. p. 37. fol. Traj. ad Rhen. 1694.</bibl></p></div></div></div><byline>[<ref target="author.W.R">W.R</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>