<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:T.torquatus_manlius_15</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:T.torquatus_manlius_15</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="T"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="torquatus-manlius-bio-15" n="torquatus_manlius_15"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><addName full="yes">Torqua'tus</addName>,
        <surname full="yes">Ma'nlius</surname></persName></label></head><p>14. <persName xml:lang="la"><forename full="yes">L.</forename><surname full="yes">Manlius</surname><addName full="yes">Torquatus</addName></persName>, L. F., was consul <date when-custom="-65">B. C. 65</date>
      with L. Aurelius Cotta. Torquatus and Cotta obtained the consulship in consequence of the
      condemnation, on account of bribery, of P. Cornelius Sulla and P. Autronius Paetus, who had
      been already elected consuls. It is stated by Dio Cassius (36.27) that Cotta and his colleague
      accused the consuls elect; but it appears from Cicero (<hi rend="ital">de Fin.</hi> 2.19, <hi rend="ital">pro Sull. 17, 18</hi>) that this is a mistake, and that it was the younger
      Torquatus [No. 15] who brought the accusation against Sulla and Paetus. Before Torquatus and
      Cotta entered upon the consulship, the first Catilinarian conspiracy, as it is called, was
      formed, in which Sulla and Paetus are said to have united with Catiline for the purpose of
      assassinating the consuls on the 1st of January. This conspiracy, however, failed. At this
      time and during his consulship Torquatus was in close connection with Hortensius, and he did
      not consult Cicero on any matters, although the latter was then praetor, and was very intimate
      with the younger Torquatus. (Cic. <hi rend="ital">pro Sull. 4.</hi>) Notwithstanding this
      attempt upon his life, Torquatus defended Catiline in the course of the same year when he was
      accused of extortion (<hi rend="ital">de repetundis</hi>) in his province. After his
      consulship Torquatus obtained the province of Macedonia, where he performed some exploits; in
      consequence of which the senate, upon the motion of Cicero, conferred upon him the title of
      imperator. During Cicero's consulship, <date when-custom="-63">B. C. 63</date>, he took an active
      part in suppressing the Catilinarian conspiracy, although he was then out of health. He also
      supported Cicero, when he was banished in <date when-custom="-58">B. C. 58</date>, and interceded in
      vain on his behalf with the consul Piso. He is not mentioned again, and probably died soon
      afterwards. Cicero speaks of him (<hi rend="ital">Brut. 68</hi>) as "elegans in dicendo, in
      existimando admodum prudens, toto genere perurbanus ;" and as he belonged to the
      aristocratical party, the orator praises his <hi rend="ital">gravitas, sanctitas,</hi> and <hi rend="ital">constantia.</hi> (<bibl n="D. C. 36.27">D. C. 36.27</bibl>; Sall. <hi rend="ital">Cat. 18 ;</hi> Liv. <hi rend="ital">Epit. 101 ;</hi> Cic. <hi rend="ital">de Div.</hi> 1.12,
       <hi rend="ital">de Leg. Agr.</hi> 2.17, <hi rend="ital">pro Sull. 4,</hi> 10, 12, 29, <hi rend="ital">ad Att.</hi> 12.21, <hi rend="ital">in Pison. 19, 20, 31.</hi>)</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>