<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:T.timotheus_13</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:T.timotheus_13</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="T"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="timotheus-bio-13" n="timotheus_13"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Timo'theus</surname></persName></head><p>(<persName xml:lang="grc"><surname full="yes">Τιμόθεος</surname></persName>), a statuary and
      sculptor, whose country is not mentioned, but who evidently belonged to the later Attic school
      of the time of Scopas and Praxiteles; for he was one of the artists who executed the
      bas-reliefs which adorned the frieze of the Mausoleum, about Ol. 107, <date when-custom="-352">B. C.
       352</date>. Timotheus sculptured the southern side of the frieze, the other three sides being
      wrought by Scopas, Bryaxis, and Leochares. (<bibl n="Plin. Nat. 36.5.4">Plin. Nat. 36.5. s.
       4</bibl>. § .9; Vitruv. vii. Praef. § 12 ; <hi rend="smallcaps">SCOPAS</hi>; <hi rend="ital">Dict. of Antiq. s. v. Mausoleum,</hi> 2d ed.) This statement also shows the
      eminence of Timotheus as an artist; for Pliny expressly tells us that it was an undetermined
      question, which of the four artists had been the most successful (<hi rend="ital">hodieque
       certant manus</hi>). It must, however, be mentioned, that the Greek writers on the Mausoleum
      were not agreed as to the share of Timothens in its execution, some ascribing to Praxiteles
      that side of <pb n="1151"/> the frieze which others assigned to our artist. (Vitruv. <hi rend="ital">l.c.</hi>)</p><p>The <title>Artemis</title> of Timotheus was esteemed worthy to be placed by the side of the
      Apollo of Scopas and the Latona of Praxiteles, in the temple which Augustus erected to Apollo
      on the Palatine (Plin. <hi rend="ital">l.c.</hi> § 10; the lines of Propertius,
      describing these statues, are quoted under <hi rend="smallcaps">SCOPAS</hi>, p. 756b.). The
      head of this statue, however, was only a restoration by Aulanius Evander. (Plin. <hi rend="ital">l.c.</hi>)</p><p>Pausanias (<bibl n="Paus. 2.32.3">2.32.3</bibl>. s. 4) mentions Timotheus as the maker of a
      statue at Troezen, which the Troezenians themselves believed to represent Hippolytus, but
      which he considered to be the statue of Asclepius. Pliny also enumerates Timotheus among the
      artists who made <hi rend="ital">athletas et armatos ct venatores sacrificantesque</hi> (<hi rend="ital">H. N.</hi> 34.8. s. 19.34). There is no ground for the doubt expressed by Sillig
      respecting the identity of the Timotheus referred to in all these passages. It is quite true
      that the artists of the later Attic school of sculpture wrought chiefly in marble; but there
      is sufficient evidence that they also practised the art of casting in bronze. </p><byline>[<ref target="author.P.S">P.S</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>