<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:T.timocreon_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:T.timocreon_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="T"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="timocreon-bio-1" n="timocreon_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Timo'creon</surname></persName></head><p>(<label xml:lang="grc">Τιμοκρέων</label>), of Rhodes, a lyric <pb n="1138"/> poet,
      celebrated for the bitter and pugnacious spirit of his works, and especially for his attacks
      on Themistocles and Simonides. From fragments of his poetry, which are preserved by Plutarch
       (<hi rend="ital">Themist. 21</hi>), it appears that he was a native of Ialysus in Rhodes,
      whence he was banished on the then common charge of an inclination towards Persia (<foreign xml:lang="grc">μηδισμός</foreign>); and in this banishment he was left neglected by
      Themistocles, who had formerly been his friend, and his connection by the ties of hospitality.
      According to Plutarch, the influence of Themistocles was positively employed to procure the
      banishment of Timocreon : but from the words of the poet himself, the offence seems to have
      amounted only to his neglecting to procure Timocreon's recall from exile, when he obtained
      that favour for other political fugitives. This distinction Timocreon ascribes to pecuniary
      corruption; and, in another passage quoted by Plutarch (<hi rend="ital">ibid.</hi>) he
      insinuates that Themistocles was not free from the guilt of the same political crime for which
      he himself was suffering. It is to be observed that Timocreon does not deny the charge brought
      against him, but he even admits it, unless the words <quote xml:lang="grc" rend="blockquote"><l>οὐκ ἄρα Τιμοκρέων μοῦνος ὃς Μήδοισιν ὅρκια τέμνει</l></quote></p><p>are to be construed hypothetically. According to the statement of Thrasymachus (apud <hi rend="ital">Ath.</hi> x. p. 416a.) he was at one time living at the Persian court. Plutarch
      also tells us that after the exile of Themistocles, Timocreon attacked him still more
      violently in an ode, the opening lines of which call on the " Muse to confer fame upon this
      strain throughout Greece, as is fitting and just." Hence it follows that Timocreon was still
      flourishing after <date when-custom="-471">B. C. 471</date>.</p><p>The three fragments thus referred to by Plutarch constitute the greater part of the extant
      remains of Timocreon; and hence it may be conjectured that poetry was not the business of his
      life, but only the accidental form in which he uttered the violent emotions which political
      misfortunes and personal wrongs would naturally excite in a man of great vigour of mind as
      well as body. For that such was his constitution of body appears from the fact that he was an
      athlete in that combination of the contests which required the greatest strength, namely the
      pentathlon (Ath. x. p. 415f.). Thrasymachus (<hi rend="ital">l.c.</hi>) relates a specimen,
      which was exhibited at the Persian court, of Timocreon's prodigious strength, and of the
      voracity by which he sustained it; and hence, as well as from the satyric spirit of his
      poetry, is derived the point of that epigram which, according to Athenaeus (<hi rend="ital">l.c.</hi>), was inscribed upon his tomb :-- <quote xml:lang="grc" rend="blockquote"><l>Πολλὰ πιὼν, καὶ πολλὰ φαγὼν καὶ πολλὰ κάκʼ εἰπὼν</l><l>ἀνθρώπους, κεῖμαι Τιμοκρέων Ῥόδιος.</l></quote></p><p>If, as modern scholars generally suppose, this epigram was written by Simonides, it does not
      necessarily follow that Timocreon died before Simonides ; for an epitaph, as a vehicle of
      satire on a living person, is a species of wit of which we have many examples in the history
      of poetry, both ancient and modern. For the fact of the rivalry between Simonides and
      Timocreon, we have the testimony of Diogenes Laertius (2.46), and of Suidas; and the Greek
      Anthology contains an epigram by Timocreon (<hi rend="ital">Anth. Pal.</hi> 13.31), <quote xml:lang="grc"><l>Κηΐα με προσῆλθε φλυαρία οὐκ ἐθέλοντα.</l><l>οὐκ ἐθέλοντά με προσῆλθε Κηΐα φλυαρία</l></quote> which is evidently a parody on
      the following epigram of Simonides (<hi rend="ital">Anth. Pal.</hi> 13.30), <quote rend="blockquote" xml:lang="grc"><l>Μοῦσά μοι Ἀλκμήνης καλλισφύρου υἱὸν
        ἄειδε</l><l>υἱὸν Ἀλκμήμης ἄειδε Μοῦσά μοι καλλισφύρου.</l></quote></p><p>The attacks of Timocreon on his contemporaries have led Suidas, or the writer whom he
      follows, into the erroneous statement, that he was a comic poet of the Old Comedy, and that he
      wrote comedies against Themistocles and Simonides; although in the very same article we have
      another account of these attacks, evidently from a better source, in which the poem against
      Themistocles is expressly called lyric (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐμμελοῦς</foreign>). In
      another passage of Suidas (<hi rend="ital">s. v.</hi>
      <foreign xml:lang="grc">σκόλιον</foreign>), he is made an epic poet (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐποποιός</foreign>); a mistake borrowed from a passage in the
       <title>Scholia</title> on Aristophanes (<hi rend="ital">Ran. 1302</hi>), where, however, the
      error is manifest, as the quotation made is from a scolion by Timocreon; and, in another
      passage of the <title>Scholia</title> (<title>Acharn.</title> 532), where the same quotation
      is made, and of which indeed the former passage seems to be merely a transcript, Timocreon is
      rightly designated <foreign xml:lang="grc">μελοποιός</foreign>. The quotation made in these
      passages consists of two lines from a scolion on the mischiefs caused by riches, in which the
      poet utters the wish " that blind Plutus had never appeared upon earth, neither upon the sea,
      nor on the mainland, but had had Tartarus and Acheron for his abode." We have also some lines,
      which Hephaestion (p. 71) quotes, as an example of the Ionic a Minore Dimeter Catalectic or
      Timocreontic metre, from the commencement of what appears to have been a Sybaritic apologue,
      namely <quote rend="blockquote" xml:lang="grc"><l>Σικελὸς κομψὸς ἀνήρ</l><l>ποτὶ τὰν μητέῤ ἔφα,</l></quote> which are also referred to by Plato (<hi rend="ital">Gorg.</hi> p. 493a.), where we have an indication of the popularity of Timocreon's poems at
      Athens, although later writers condemned the moral spirit of his compositions (Aristeid. vol.
      ii. p. 380, <foreign xml:lang="grc">μηδὲ Τιμοκρέοντος τοῦ σχετλίου πρᾶγμα
       ποιῶμεν</foreign> and the sober judgment of modern criticism is that he gave proofs of a
      high degree of talent, which he abused through want of character and repose. The fragments
      already referred to comprise all his extant remains, except a single pentameter, quoted by
      Hephaestion (p. 4) from his <title xml:lang="la">Epigrams,</title> and two references, which
      Diogenianus (<hi rend="ital">Praef.</hi> pp. 179,180, ed. Schneidewin) makes to his works.
      There is also a chorus in the <hi rend="ital">Wasps</hi> of Aristophanes (1060, foll.), which,
      the Scholiast tells us, on the authority of Didymus, is a parody on an ode by Timocreon.
      (Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Graec.</hi> vol. ii. pp. 144, 159, 504, vol. iv. p. 498, vol.
      viii. p. 635; Böckh, <hi rend="ital">Prooem. Aest. Lect. Berol. 1833 ;</hi> Bernhardy,
       <hi rend="ital">Grundriss d. Griech. Litt.</hi> vol. ii. pp. 542-544; Ulrici; Bode; Brunck,
       <hi rend="ital">Anal.</hi> vol. i. p. 148; Jacobs, <hi rend="ital">Anth. Graec.</hi> vol. i.
      p. 80, vol. xiii. p. 962; Schneidewin, <hi rend="ital">Delect. Poes. Graec.</hi> pp. 427-431;
      Bergk, <hi rend="ital">Poet. Lyr. Graec.</hi> pp. 807-810 ; Clinton, <hi rend="ital">F.
       H.</hi> vol. ii. <hi rend="ital">s. a. 471</hi>). </p><byline>[<ref target="author.P.S">P.S</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>