<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:T.theophilus_5</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:T.theophilus_5</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="T"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="theophilus-bio-5" n="theophilus_5"><head><persName xml:lang="la" xml:id="tlg-1725"><surname full="yes">Theo'philus</surname></persName></head><p>4. Bishop of Antioch, in the latter part of the second century of our era, and the author of
      one of the early apologies for Christianity which have come down to us. The common opinion
      concerning his time, derived from Eusebius, Jerome, and Nicephorus, has been elaborately
      canvassed by Dodwell and others, whose arguments are fully examined, and satisfactorily
      answered by Cave (<hi rend="ital">Hist. Litt. s. a. 168</hi>), and Harless (<hi rend="ital">ad
       Fabric. Bibl. Graec.</hi> vol. vii. p. 102). In the eighth (Heron. <hi rend="ital">Chron. s.
       a. 2184</hi>) or tenth (Euseb. <hi rend="ital">Chron. s. a. 2186 ;</hi> Syncoll. p. 352d.)
      year of Marcus Antoninus (<date when-custom="168">A. D. 168</date>/9 or 170/1), he succeeded Eros in
      the see of Antioch, of which he was the sixth bishop (<bibl n="Euseb. Hist. Eccl. 4.20">Euseb.
       Hist. Eccl. 4.20</bibl>; Hieron. <hi rend="ital">de Vir. Ill. 25</hi>), or, including S.
      Peter, the seventh (Hieron. <hi rend="ital">Algas.</hi> vol. iii. p. 318; Niceph. <hi rend="ital">Chron.</hi> p. 417c.) ; and he held that office for thirteen years, that is, till
       <date when-custom="181">A. D. 181</date> or 183 (Niceph. <hi rend="ital">l.c.</hi>). Having been
      originally a heathen <note anchored="true" place="margin">* Respecting the opinion that he was not a heathen,
       but a Jew and a Sadducee, see Harless, <hi rend="ital">l.c.,</hi> p. 101.</note> , as he
      tells us himself (<hi rend="ital">Ad Autolyc.</hi> i. p. 78), he was converted to Christianity
      by the study of the sacred Scriptures.</p><div><head>Works</head><div><head>The Three Books to Autolycus</head><p>Besides other religious works, Theophilus wrote an apology for the Christian faith, in the
        form of a letter to a friend, named Autolycus, who was still a heathen, but a man of
        extensive reading and great learning, and an earnest lover of truth (Theoph. <hi rend="ital">ad Autolyc. 1.</hi> p. 69b., iii. pp. 119, a., 127, b., 138, d.). This work must have been
        written, or, at least, finished, shortly before the death of Theophilus, for there is an
        allusion towards the close of it, which fixes the composition of that part after the death
        of Marcus Antoninus, in <date when-custom="180">A. D. 180</date>; and, according to the preceding
        testimonies, Theophilus did not live later than <date when-custom="183">A. D. 183</date>, or
        perhaps than <date when-custom="181">A. D. 181</date>. The work is cited by various titles, either
        simply <foreign xml:lang="grc">πρὸς Αὐτόλυκον βιβλία γ́</foreign>, or with the
        addition <foreign xml:lang="grc">περὶ τῆς τῶν Χριστιανῶν πίστεως</foreign>, or, as
        Eusebius has it (<hi rend="ital">H. E.</hi> 4.24), <foreign xml:lang="grc">τρία τὰ πρὸς
         αὐτόλυκον στοιχειώδη συγγράμματα</foreign>, implying that the object of the work was to
        teach Autolycus the elements of Christian truth; and again, in a MS. in the Paris library,
        the title is given with an addition which states the object of the work to be, to prove "
        that the divine oracles in our possession are more ancient and more true than the statements
        of Egyptian and all other historians." It is quoted by Lactantius (2.23), by the title of
         <title xml:lang="la">De Temporibus,</title> and it is mentioned by Gennadius (33) who
        erroneously ascribes it to Theophilus of Alexandria. The work shows much leaning and more
        simplicity of mind; in its general structure, it resembles the works of Justin Martyr and
        the other early apologists ; but it contains a more detailed examination of the evidence for
        Christianity derived both from Scripture and from history. Some of the arguments are
        fanciful, not to say puerile, in the extreme; for example, he interprets <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐν ἀρχῇ</foreign>, in Genesis 1.1, as meaning <hi rend="ital">by
         Christ.</hi> He indulges much in allegorical interpretations : thus, the three days,
        preceding the creation of the sun and moon, are typical of the Trinity of God and his Word
        and his Wisdom; a passage, by the way, which is believed to contain the earliest instance of
        the use of the word Trinity in the writings of The Fathers. The work, however, contains much
        valuable latter; and its style is clear and good.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p>The three books of Theophilus to Autolycus were first published in the collection of the
         monks Antonius and Maximus, entitled <title xml:lang="la">Sententiarum sive Capitum,
          Theologicorum praecipue, ex sacris et profanis libris, Tomi tres,</title> and containing,
         besides the work of Theophilus, the <title>Centuriae</title> of Maximus, and the
          <title>Oratio ad Graecos</title> of Tatian, edited by Conrad Gesner, Tiguri, 1546, fol.:
         again with the Latin version of Conrad Clauser, in the collections of the <title>Scriptores
          Sacri,</title> or <title>Orthodoxographi,</title> published in 1555 and 155), fol. (see
         Hoffmann, <hi rend="ital">Lex. Bibliogr.</hi>) : with the editions of Justin Martyr, 1615,
         1636, 1686, 1712, 1747, fol. : with notes by Fronto Ducaeus, in the <title>Auctuar.
          Biblioth. Patrum,</title> Paris, 1624, fol.: with a revised text and notes, by John Fell,
         bishop of Oxford, Oxon. 1684, 12mo.: the most complete edition is that of Jo. Christoph.
         Wolf, Hamb. 1724, 8vo.</p></div><div><head>Translations</head><p>It has been translated into English by Joseph Betty, Oxf. 1722, 8vo.</p><p>It has been translated into German by G. C. Hosmann, Hamb, 1729, 8vo.</p></div></div><div><head>Other Works</head><p>Theophilus was the author of several other works, which were extant in the times of
        Eusebius and Jerome (Euseb. <hi rend="ital">Chron. Arm. l.c. ;</hi> Hieron. <hi rend="ital">Chron. l.c.</hi>; Sync. <hi rend="ital">l.c.</hi>) Among there, were works against the
        heresies of Marcion and Hermogenes, in the latter of which the Apocalypse was quoted. (<bibl n="Euseb. Hist. Eccl. 4.24">Euseb. Hist. Eccl. 4.24</bibl>; Hieron. <hi rend="ital">de Vir.
         Illust. 25.</hi>) Jerome also mentions a Commentary on the Gospels, which seems to have
        been a sort of harmony, and of which <pb n="1085"/> he made use in his own Commentaries, but
        which he thinks not equal in style to the other works of Theophilus. (<hi rend="ital">V. I
         l.c.; Praef. in Matt.; Algas.</hi> vol. iii. p. 318.)</p></div><div><head>Commentary on various passages of the Gospels</head><p>There are still extant, in Latin only, under the name of Theophilus, four books of
        allegorical commentaries on various passages of the Gospels, which the best critics
        pronounce to be undoubtedly an original Latin work, of a period much subsequent to the time
        of Theophilus, although very probably his commentary may have been used in its
        compilation.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>This commentary is published in the <title>Bibliothecae Patrum,</title> Paris,
          1575, 1598, 1609, 1654, Colon. 1618, Ludg. 1677.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>Catechetical Works</head><p>Eusebius further mentions certain catechetical works by him (<foreign xml:lang="grc">καὶ ἕτερα δέ τινα κατηχητικὰ αὐτοῦ βιβλία</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">H. E.</hi>
        4.24; <hi rend="ital">breves elegantesque tractatus ad aedificationem ecclesiae
         pertinentes,</hi> Hieron. <hi rend="ital">V. I. l.c.</hi>).</p></div><div><head>Commentaries on Proverbs</head><p>Jerome (<hi rend="ital">l.c.</hi>) refers to his <title xml:lang="la">Commentaries on the
         Proverbs,</title> in connection with his <title xml:lang="la">Commentaries on the
         Gospels,</title> and with the same qualification as to their style.</p></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Cave, <hi rend="ital">Hist. Litt. s. a. 168,</hi> pp. 69-71 ; Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl.
        Graec.</hi> vol. vii. pp. 101-106 ; Lardner, <hi rend="ital">Credibility ;</hi> Mosheim, <hi rend="ital">Eccles. Hist.</hi> Murdock's <hi rend="ital">Note,</hi> vol. i. p. 155, Engl.
       ed.; Clinton, <hi rend="ital">Fasti Rom. s. aa. 171, 181.</hi></p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>