<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:T.theophanes_2</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:T.theophanes_2</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="T"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="theophanes-bio-2" n="theophanes_2"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Theo'phanes</surname></persName></head><p>2. Of Byzantium, one of the writers of the Byzantine history, flourished most probably in
      the latter part of the sixth century of our era.</p><div><head>Works</head><div><head>History of the Eastern Empire</head><p>He wrote, in ten books, the history of the Eastern Empire (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἱστορικῶν λόγοι δέκα</foreign>), during the Persian war under Justin II., beginning
        from the second year of Justin, in which the truce made by Justinian with Chosroes was
        broken, <date when-custom="567">A. D. 567</date>. and going down to the tenth year of the war,
        which, according to Mr. Clinton, was not <date when-custom="577">A. D. 577</date>, but <date when-custom="581">A. D. 581</date>, because the war did not begin till A. D. 571, although the
        history of Theophanes may have commenced with <date when-custom="567">A. D. 567</date>.</p><p>Photius (<hi rend="ital">Bibl.</hi> Cod. 64) gives an account of the work of Theophanes,
        and he repeats the author's statement that, besides adding other books to the ten which
        formed the original work, he had written another work on the history of Justinian. It well
        deserves mention that, among the historical statements preserved by Photius from Theophanes
        is the discovery, in the reign of Justinian, of the fact that silk was the production of a
        worm, which had not been before known to the people of the Roman empire A certain Persian,
        he tells us. coming from the land of the Seres, brought to Constantinople " the seed "
         (<foreign xml:lang="grc">τὸ σπέρμα</foreign>, the eggs, of course) of the silk-worm,
        and these " seeds" being hatched in the spring, and the worms fed with mulberry leaves, they
        spun their silk, and went through their transformations.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>The <title>Excerpta</title> of Photius from the ten books of the history of
          Theophanes were printed in Greek, with a Latin version by Andr. Schottus, and notes by Ph.
          Labbe, in Valesius's edition of the <title>Excerpta de Legationibus,</title> from Dexippus
          and others, Paris, 1648, fol.</bibl>; <bibl>reprinted in the Venetian collection of the
          Byzantine historians, Venet. 1729, fol. </bibl>: <bibl>they are also printed in the volume
          of Niebuhr's <hi rend="ital">Corpus Scriptorum Hist. Byzant.,</hi> containing Dexippus,
          &amp;c., Bonn. 1829, 8vo.</bibl></p></div></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Cave, <hi rend="ital">Hist. Litt. s. a. 580,</hi> vol. i. p. 537, ed. Basil.; Hankius, <hi rend="ital">Byz. Rer. Script.</hi> 2.4, pp. 674, foll.; Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl.
        Graec.</hi> vol. vii. pp. 459, 541, 543; Vossius, <hi rend="ital">de Hist. Graec.</hi> pp.
       327, 328, ed. Westermann; Clinton, <hi rend="ital">Fasti Romani. s. aa. 567, 568,
       571.</hi></p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>