<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:T.tetricus_c_pesuvius_pivesus_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:T.tetricus_c_pesuvius_pivesus_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="T"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="tetricus-c-pesuvius-pivesus-bio-1" n="tetricus_c_pesuvius_pivesus_1"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><addName full="yes">Te'tricus</addName>, <forename full="yes">C.</forename><surname full="yes">Pesu'vius</surname><addName full="yes">Pive'sus</addName></persName></label></head><p>twenty-fourth on the list of Pollio, son of the pre ceding, although a child at the time of
      his father's elevation, was forthwith proclaimed Caesar. Whether he subsequently received the
      title of Augustus is a matter of doubt, since the evidence afforded by medals, our surest
      guide in such matters, is in the present instance indistinct and contradictory. He shared the
      favour displayed towards his father by Aurelian, was treated with distinction by the princes
      who followed, and passed with credit through all the grades of Senatorian rank, transmitting
      his patrimony, undiminished, to his heirs. The house of the Tetrici. on the Caelian hill, was
      still in existence when Pollio wrote, and contained a picture in which Aurelian was
      represented in the act of investing the father and son with senatorial robes, receiving from
      them, in return, a sceptre and civic crown.</p><p>We have given, above, the names of these two personages as exhibited by Eckhel. The family
      designation <hi rend="ital">Pesuvius</hi> or <hi rend="ital">Pesubius</hi> seems established,
      beyond a question, by coins and inscriptions, but we cannot so readily admit <hi rend="ital">Pivesus,</hi> which Eckhel supposes to have been derived by the son from a mother Pivesa. In
      the first place, Pesuvius and <figure/>
      <pb n="1014"/> Pivesus, or their contractions, are never found together upon the same piece.
      Secondly, <hi rend="smallcaps">PIVESUS</hi>, <hi rend="smallcaps">PIVESU</hi>, <hi rend="smallcaps">PIVES</hi>, and <hi rend="smallcaps">PIV</hi>., appear only in the silver
      and small brass coins, all of which are of rude and inferior workmanship, while the gold,
      which are executed with care and skill, present uniformly C. <hi rend="smallcaps">PES</hi>.
       <hi rend="smallcaps">TETRICUS</hi>. <hi rend="smallcaps">CAES</hi>., and hence we are
      inclined to conclude that Pivesus was a mispronunciation, by barbarous lips, of <hi rend="ital">Pesuvius,</hi> and had no real existence as a distinct name. </p><byline>[<ref target="author.W.R">W.R</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>