<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:S.straton_12</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:S.straton_12</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="S"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="straton-bio-12" n="straton_12"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Straton</surname></persName></head><p>3. A pupil of Erasistratus in the third century B. C., who appears to have lived on very
      intimate terms with his tutor. (<bibl n="D. L. 5.3.61">D. L. 5.3.61</bibl> ; Galen. <hi rend="ital">De Ven. Sect. adv. Erasistr. Rom. Deg.</hi> 100.2, vol. xi. p. 197; Oribas. <hi rend="ital">Coll. Medic.</hi> 45.23, p. 60, ed. Mai.) He wrote a work to explain the
      difficult words found in the writings of Hippocrates, which is mentioned by Erotianus (<hi rend="ital">Gloss. Hippocr. s. v.</hi>
      <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἄμβην</foreign>). Like the rest of the followers of Erasistratus,
      he was averse to blood-letting (Galen. <hi rend="ital">De Ven. Sect. adv. Erasistr.</hi>
      100.2, vol. xi. p. 151), but could not give any very good reasons for his opinion. He is
      probably the physician quoted by Alexander Trallianus (1.15, pp. 156, 157), and Aetius (1.2,
      3, 4.1, 7, 46, pp. 64, 616, 628). He was <hi rend="ital">tutor</hi> to Apollonius of Memphis
      (Galen. <hi rend="ital">De Diff. Puls.</hi> 4.17, vol. viii. p. 759), and not his <hi rend="ital">father,</hi> as some have supposed. [<hi rend="smallcaps">APOLLONIUS</hi>
      <note anchored="true" place="margin">* Straton is here too positively said to have been <hi rend="ital">the
        native of Berytus;</hi> he ought to have been called <hi rend="ital">the follower of
        Erasistratus,</hi> who may possibly have been " the native of Berytus," but cannot be proved
       to have been so.</note>, p. 246.] See Sprengel's <hi rend="ital">Gesch. der Arzneik.</hi>
      vol. i. pp. 559, 561, ed. 1846.</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>