<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:S.stauracius_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:S.stauracius_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="S"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="stauracius-bio-1" n="stauracius_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Staura'cius</surname></persName></head><p>(<persName xml:lang="grc"><surname full="yes">Σταυράκιος</surname></persName> Emperor of
      Constantinople, son of the Emperor Nicephorus I. [<hi rend="smallcaps">NICEPHORUS</hi> I.],
      first the colleague of his father, and after his death for a short time sole emperor. He was
      solemnly crowned as emperor in the month of December <date when-custom="803">A. D. 803</date> in the
      second year of his father's reign in the ambo or pulpit of the great Church (St. Sophia) at
      Constantinople, by the hand of the patriarch Tarasius : being altogether unfitted, according
      to Theophanes, either in personal appearance, bodily strength, or judgment, for such a
      dignity. Possibly this unfitness arose from his youth, for it was not until Dec. 807, four
      years after his coronation, that Stauracius was married. His bride was Theophano, an Athenian
      lady, kinswoman of the late Empress Irene [<hi rend="smallcaps">IRENE</hi>], who was selected
      by Nicephorus for his son after a careful search among the unmarried ladies of the empire,
      notwithstanding she was already betrothed to a husband, with whom, though not fully married to
      him, her union had been consummated. The choice of so contaminated a partner dishonoured the
      unhappy prince to whom she was given as a wife, and the unbridled lust of Nicephorus cast
      additional contempt on his son by the seduction about the time of the marriage of two young
      ladies more beautiful than Theophano, and who had been selected as competitors with her for
      the hand of the young emperor. In May A.D. 811 Stauracius left Constantinople with his father
      to take the field against the Bulgarians at the head of an army, the number of which struck
      terror into the heart of the Bulgarian king and induced him to sue for peace, which was
      refused. The first encounters, which were favourable to the Greeks, appear to have been
      directed by Stauracius, for his father ascribed them to his skill and good fortune. The
      Bulgarians again sued for peace and again their suit was rejected. In the following fatal
      battle, in which Nicephorus was killed and the Greek army almost annihilated, Stauracius
      received a wound in or near the spine, under the torture of which he escaped with difficulty
      to Adrianople. Here he was proclaimed autocrator,sole emperor, by the officers who surrounded
      him, and this announcement was received by those who had escaped with him from the slaughter
      with a delight which evidenced his personal popularity. Michael the Curopalata, who had
      married Procopia, daughter of Nicephorus, and who had also escaped from the slaughter, but
      unwounded, was solicited by some of his friends to assume the purple; but he declined,
      professedly out of regard to the oaths of fealty which he had taken to Nicephorus and
      Stauracius, perhaps from a conviction that the attempt would not succeed. Stauracius was
      conveyed in a litter to Constantinople, where he was exhorted by the patriarch Nicephorus [<hi rend="smallcaps">NICEPHORUS</hi>, Byzantine writers, <pb n="904"/> No 9] to seek the Divine
      mercy and to make restitution to those whom his father had oppressed. "Being," says Theophanes
      " the genuine inheritor of his father's disposition," but perhaps influenced by the exhaustion
      of the imperial finances through an unfortunate war, he replied, that he could not spare for
      restitution more than three talents. " This," says the irate historian, " was but a small part
      of what he (Nicephorus) had wrongfully taken." The painfulness of his wounds, the suggestions
      of Theophano, who hoped, like Irene. to grasp the sceptre, and probably the intrigues of the
      parties themselves, alienated Stauracius from his brother-in-law Michael and several of the
      great officers of the court, and he is said to have contemplated bequeathing the empire to his
      wife, or even restoring the ancient forms of the Roman Republic. His courtiers conspired
      against him, and Stauracius having proposed to put out the eves of Michael, matters were
      brought to a crisis; Michael was proclaimed emperor (Oct. 811), and Stauracius having put on
      the habit of a monk, was deposed, and died soon after his deposition, having reigned only two
      months and six days after his father's death. His widow Theophano embraced a monastic life,
      and employed the wealth which the humanity or policy of Michael [<hi rend="smallcaps">MICHAEL</hi> I. <hi rend="smallcaps">RHANGABE</hi>] allowed her, in converting her palace
      into a monastery called " Hebraica" (<foreign xml:lang="grc">τὰ Ἑβραϊκὰ</foreign>) and
      by corruption Braca (<foreign xml:lang="grc">τὰ Βραχᾶ</foreign>), and at a later period
      Stauraca (<foreign xml:lang="grc">Σταυρακᾶ</foreign>), because in it the body of
      Stauracius, and afterwards that of Theophano, were buried. According to some writers his body
      was deposited in (perhaps transferred to) the monastery of Satyrus. The character of
      Stauracius is drawn in the most unfavourable colours by Theophanes, Zonaras, and others : but
      it was the misfortune of Nicephorus and his son to come between the two sovereigns, Irene and
      Michael Rhangabe, whose services to orthodoxy or profusion to the church made them great
      favourites with the ecclesiastical annalists of the Byzantine empire ; and their evanescent
      dynasty was founded by the deposition of one and overthrown to make way for the elevation of
      the other of these favourites of the church. It is reasonable therefore to suppose that their
      characters have been unfairly represented; and, in the case of Stauracius especially, things
      harmless or unimportant have been described as evidences of the greatest depravity.
      (Theophanes, <hi rend="ital">Chronog.</hi> pp. 405-419, ed. Paris; pp. 322-332,ed. Venice; pp.
      745-769, ed. Bonn; Leo Grammaticus, <hi rend="ital">Chronog.</hi> pp. 204-206, ed. Bonn;
      Cedrenus, <hi rend="ital">Compend.</hi> pp. 477-482, ed. Paris; vol. ii. pp. 33-43, ed. Bonn;
      Le Beau, <hi rend="ital">Bas Empire,</hi> liv. lxvii, ch. x. xxviii--xxxv.; Gibbon, <hi rend="ital">Decline and Fall,</hi> ch. xlviii.) </p><byline>[<ref target="author.J.C.M">J.C.M</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>