<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:S.soter_julius_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:S.soter_julius_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="S"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="soter-julius-bio-1" n="soter_julius_1"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><addName full="yes">Soter</addName>,
        <surname full="yes">Julius</surname></persName></label></head><p>is supposed, on the authority of an inscription, to have been an artist in the fine species
      of mosaic, which was practised under the Roman emperors; but the matter is open to
      controversy. The inscription (Orelli, <hi rend="ital">Inscr. Lat.</hi> No. 4262), mentions the
      name of Soter as <hi rend="smallcaps">PICTORIS</hi>
      <hi rend="smallcaps">QUADRIGULARI</hi>, which Welcker and others have explained in the above
      manner; but Raoul-Rochette, with more ingenuity than sound judgment, brings forward various
      arguments for reading <hi rend="ital">Pistoris,</hi> and so turning the artist into a baker!
      (Welcker, <hi rend="ital">Rhein. Mus.</hi> vol. i. p. 289; Müller, <hi rend="ital">Archäol. d. Kunst,</hi> § 322, n. 4; R. Rochette, <hi rend="ital">Lettre à
       M. Schorn,</hi> pp. 443-445, 2d ed.) </p><byline>[<ref target="author.P.S">P.S</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>