<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:S.sostratus_17</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:S.sostratus_17</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="S"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="sostratus-bio-17" n="sostratus_17"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">So'stratus</surname></persName></head><p>3. A statuary in bronze, whom Pliny mentions as a contemporary of Lysippus, at Ol. 114,
       <date when-custom="-323">B. C. 323</date>, the date of <ref target="alexander-the-great-bio-1">Alexander's</ref> death. (<hi rend="ital">H. N.</hi> 34.8. s. 19). Even if we make all
      allowance for Pliny's practice of grouping together, at some marked historical epoch, artists
      who were only partially contemporary, we can hardly suppose this Sostratus to have been the
      same person as the preceding. But, on the other hand, considering how frequently different
      branches of art were cultivated by the same person, there is much probability in Thiersch's
      conjecture, that he was identical with the following.</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>