<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:S.sosigenes_4</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:S.sosigenes_4</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="S"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="sosigenes-bio-4" n="sosigenes_4"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Sosi'genes</surname></persName></head><p>(<label xml:lang="grc">Σωσιγένης</label>), the peripatetic, the astronomer employed by
      Julius Caesar to superintend the correction of the calendar (<date when-custom="-46">B. C.
      46</date>), is called an Egyptian, but may be supposed to have been an Alexandrian Greek. With
      the exception of certain allusions to him by name, which simply confirm the fact that he was
      considered a skilful astronomer, nothing can be found concerning him. The most definite of
      them is that of Simplicius, who says he wrote on astronomy. A sentence of Pliny (<bibl n="Plin. Nat. 2.8">Plin. Nat. 2.8</bibl>) is interpreted by Weidler as implying that
      Sosigenes maintained the motion of Mercury round the sun. Riccioli and others represent that
      he remained at Rome until the time of Augustus, and aided in the final establishment of the
      calendar according to the intention of Julius. But it must be clear that if Sosigenes had
      remained at Rome, the Augustan correction never could have been needed : the leap-year would
      never have been made a triennial intercalation under the eye of the astronomer himself.
      Nevertheless, Pliny (<bibl n="Plin. Nat. 18.25">Plin. Nat. 18.25</bibl>) mentions the Augustan
      correction, most probably, as if it had been a correction of the theory of the calendar,
      arising out of the further investigations of Sosigenes himself : his words are " ea ipsa ratio
      postea comperto errore correcta est, ita ut duodecim annis continuis non intercalaretur ....
      et Sosigenes ipse <hi rend="ital">tribus commentationibus, quanquam diligentior esset ceteris,
       non cessavit tamen addubitare, ipse semet corrigendo.</hi>" According to our view of this
      passage the <hi rend="ital">tres commentationes</hi> are of the three occasions on which,
      during the time of Augustus, an intercalation had to be omitted : Pliny seems to make each of
      them a separate interference of Sosigenes (whom he may seem to keep alive at Rome for the
      purpose) for the correction of his period. And Weidler, in <pb n="883"/> doing honour to the
      astronomer for his candour and caution, seems to follow Pliny. (Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl.
       Graec.</hi> vol. iv. p. 34; Weidler, <hi rend="ital">Histor. Astron.</hi> p. 151.) </p><byline>[<ref target="author.A.DE.M">A. De M.</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>