<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:S.silanion_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:S.silanion_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="S"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="silanion-bio-1" n="silanion_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Sila'nion</surname></persName></head><p>(<label xml:lang="grc">Σιλανίων</label>), a distinguished Greek statuary in bronze, is
      mentioned by Pliny among the contemporaries of Lysippus at Ol. 114, <date when-custom="-324">B. C.
       324</date> (<hi rend="ital">H. N.</hi> 34.8. s. 19).</p><p>He probably belonged, however, not to the school of Lysippus, but to the later Attic school;
      for we learn from Pausanias (<bibl n="Paus. 6.4.3">6.4.3</bibl>) that he was an Athenian. The
      passage of Pliny, as commonly understood, represents Silanion as a wonderful instance of a
      selftaught artist; but perhaps the words " <hi rend="ital">in hoc mirabile, quod nullo doctore
       nobilis flit,</hi>" may be referred to Lysippus, rather than to Silanion. So, also, in the
      next clause, " <hi rend="ital">ipse discipulum. habuit Zeuxiadem,</hi>" there is a doubt left,
      whether Zeuxiades was the disciple of Silanion or of Lysippus. It should here be observed that
      the word <hi rend="ital">Zeuxiadem,</hi> which is the reading of all the best MSS., is
      corrupted, in the inferior MSS. and the common editions, into <hi rend="ital">Zeuxin et
       Iadem.</hi> (See Sillig, <hi rend="ital">Cat. Artif s. v.</hi> and edition of Pliny : the
      reading <hi rend="ital">Zeusiadem,</hi> which some of the best MSS. give, is the same thing,
      for it is extremely common to find <hi rend="ital">s</hi> for the Greek <foreign xml:lang="grc">ξ.</foreign>)</p><p>The statues of Silanion belong to two classes, ideal and actual portraits; the former again
      including heroes and men. Of these the most celebrated was his dying Jocasta, in which a
      deadly paleness was given to the face by the mixture of silver with the bronze; a remarkable
      example of the technical refinement, and of the principle of actual imitation which
      characterised the art of this period. We cannot conceive of Pheidias or Polycleitus descending
      to such an artifice (Plut. <hi rend="ital">de Aud. Poet. 3, Quaest. Conv.</hi> 5.1; comp. <hi rend="ital">de Pyth. Or. 2 ;</hi> respecting the general subject of the colouring of bronze
      statues, see Müller, <hi rend="ital">Archäol. d. Kunst,</hi> § 306. n. 3, ed.
      Welcker). He also made a fine statue of Achilles (Plin. <hi rend="ital">l.c.</hi> § 21),
      and one of Theseus (Plut. <hi rend="ital">Thes. 4</hi>). Tatian ascribes to him statues of the
      lyric poetesses Sappho and Corinna (Tatian. <hi rend="ital">ad Graec. 52,</hi> pp. 113, 114,
      ed. Worth ; where by <foreign xml:lang="grc">Σαπφὼ τὴν ἑταίραν</foreign> Tatian
      undoubtedly means the poetess and not, as some fancy, another person, a courtezan of Eresos,
      of whose existence there is no proof; see <hi rend="smallcaps">SAPPHO</hi>, p. 708a.). His
      statue of Sappho stood in the <hi rend="ital">prytancium</hi> at Syracuse in the time of
      Verres, who carried it off; and Cicero alludes to it in terms of the highest praise (<hi rend="ital">Verr.</hi> 4.57).</p><p>Silanion also made a statue of Plato, which <pb n="819"/> Mithridates, the son of
      Rhodobatus, set up in the Academy. (<bibl n="D. L. 3.2">D. L. 3.2</bibl>.)</p><p>Among the actual portraits of Silanion, the most celebrated appears to have been that of the
      statuary Apollodorus, who was so habitually dissatisfied with his own works, that he
      frequently broke them in pieces. The vexation of the disappointed artist was so vividly
      expressed in Silanion's statue, that Pliny says <quote xml:lang="la">nec hominem ex aere
       fecit, sed iracundiam</quote> (<hi rend="ital">l.c.</hi> § 21). Pliny also mentions his
      statue of a superintendent of the palaestra exercising the athletes. He made also three
      statues of Olympic victors; namely Satyrus of Elis, and Telestes and Demaratus of Messene.
       (<bibl n="Paus. 6.4.3">Paus. 6.4.3</bibl>, <bibl n="Paus. 6.4.14">14</bibl>. §§ 1,
      3.)</p><p>Probably this Silanion was the same as the one whom Vitruvius (vii. praef. § 14)
      mentions among those who wrote <hi rend="ital">praecepta symmetriarum ;</hi> for, although
      that phrase no doubt refers especially to the proportions of the architectural orders, yet it
      must also be understood as including the wider subject of proportion in art generally, as is
      evident both from the mention of Euphranor in the list, and also from the manner in which
      Vitruvius discusses the subject of architectural proportions in connection with the laws of
      proportion derived from the human figure (1.2, 3.1). </p><byline>[<ref target="author.P.S">P.S</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>