<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:S.sextus_11</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:S.sextus_11</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="S"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="sextus-bio-11" n="sextus_11"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Sextus</surname><addName full="yes">PYTHAGORAEUS</addName></persName></head><p>11. <hi rend="smallcaps">PYTHAGORAEUS</hi>; otherwise <hi rend="smallcaps">SEXTIUS</hi>, <hi rend="smallcaps">SIXTUS</hi>, or <hi rend="smallcaps">XYSTUS</hi>. There is extant a little
      book of moral and religious aphorisms, translated by Rufinus into Latin, and probably
      interpolated by the translator, who is known to have been sufficiently unscrupulous in such
      matters, and who has admitted, in his preface to the work, that he had made certain additions
      from the advice of a religious father to his son, "electa quaedam religiosi parentis ad
      filium." The author is called by Rufinus in the preface, Sixtus; and Rufinus adds that he was
      identified by some persons with Sixtus, bishop of <pb n="812"/> Rome and martyr; but it is to
      be observed that Rufinus does not express any opinion of his own as to their identity. Whether
      he meant Sixtus I., who was bishop early in the second century, and whose martyrdom is
      doubtful, or Sixtus II., who lived about the middle of the third century, and was certainly a
      martyr, is not clear. Origen, however, twice (<hi rend="ital">Contra Celsum,</hi> lib. 8.
      c.30, and <hi rend="ital">In Matt.</hi> torn. 15.3, vol. i. p. 763, vol. iii. p. 654, ed.
      Delarue) cites the <title>Gnomae</title> s. <hi rend="ital">Sententiae</hi> of Sextus
       (<foreign xml:lang="grc">Γνῶμαι Σέχγου</foreign>), as a work well known among
      Christians; but he does not mention either the episcopal rank or the martyrdom of the writer,
      whom, therefore, we can hardly identify with Sixtus I. And as Origen makes no reference to his
      being a contemporary writer, and speaks of his book as already in extensive circulation, it is
      difficult to suppose him to have been Sixtus II., whose elevation to the episcopate and
      martyrdom were a few years subsequent to Origen's own death. It is not clear whether Origen
      regarded Sextus as a Christian. Jerome cites the <title>Sententiae</title> of Xystus (as he
      writes the name, <hi rend="ital">Adv. Jovinian.</hi> lib. 1. c.49, and <hi rend="ital">In
       Ezekiel.</hi> c. xviii. vs. 5, 6, seq.), enumerating him in one place among writers, all the
      rest of whom are heathens, and in the other place he expressly calls him a Pythagorean. In two
      other places he charges Rufinus with prefixing the name of a martyr and bishop to the
      productions of "a Christ-less and heathenish" (absque Christo et ethnici), and in another
      place, a "most heathenish " (gentilissimi) man (Hieron. <hi rend="ital">In Jerem.</hi> c.
      xxii. vs. 24, 25, &amp;c., and <hi rend="ital">Ad Ctesiphont.</hi> 100.3, <hi rend="ital">Epist. 43,</hi> ed. Benedict., 133, ed. Vallars.). Augustin, who had at first admitted the
      identity of the author of the <hi rend="ital">Sententiae</hi> with one of the Sixti, bishops
      of Rome, afterwards retracted his opinion (comp. <hi rend="ital">De Natura et Gratia,</hi>
      100.77, and <hi rend="ital">Retractat.</hi> lib. 2. c.42). Pelagius (apud August. <hi rend="ital">Retractat. l.c.</hi>) appears to have admitted the identity, and a Syriac
      version, perhaps made from the Latin of Rufinus, which appears to have been extant in the time
      of Ebed-Jesu, A.D. 1300 (Assemani, <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Orient.</hi> vol. i. p. 429), still
      bears the name of "Mar Xystus Episcopus Romae." Maximus the Confessor, in the seventh century
       (<hi rend="ital">Schol. ad Dionys. Areop. Mysticam Theologiam,</hi> cap. 5, apud <hi rend="ital">Opp. Dionys.</hi> vol. ii. p. 55, ed. Antwerp, 1634), applies to our Sextus the
      epithet <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐκκλησιαστικὸς φιλόσοφος</foreign>, "Ecclesiasticus
      Philosophus ;" and Damascenus, in the eighth century (<hi rend="ital">Sacra Parallela,
       Opera,</hi> vol. ii. p. 362, ed. Lequien), calls him <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ζέζτου
       Ῥωμ</foreign>., Zestus of Rome. Gennadius (<hi rend="ital">De Viris Illustrib.</hi> 100.17)
      merely calls the work "<hi rend="ital">Xysti Sententiae.</hi>" In the <title>Decretum</title>
      ascribed to Pope Gelasius the work is mentioned as reputed to be by Saint Xystus, but is
      declared to be spurious, and to have been written by heretics. In the anonymous Appendix to
      the <title>De Scriptorib. Ecclesiasticis</title> of Ildefonsus of Toledo, it is ascribed to
      Sixtus of Rome without hesitation. The testimony of the ancients as to the authorship is thus
      doubtful. An opinion mentioned by, and therefore older than, Rufinus (who was unjustly charged
      with fraud in the matter by his bitter enemy Jerome, and the charge has been repeated from age
      to age), ascribed it to Pope Sixtus, and the opinion was held by some persons, perhaps by
      most, in subsequent ages. Jerome appears to have first ascribed it to a heathen author; and
      Jerome's opinion, which would have had more weight but for his eagerness to fasten a charge of
      fraud upon Rufinus, was taken, perhaps without examination, by Augustin. Modern critics have
      been divided ; some (e. g. Siberus) retain the opinion which identifies the author with Pope
      Sixtus II.; others (e. g. Lequien, <hi rend="ital">Not. ad Damascen. l.c.</hi>) regard the
      author as at any rate a Christian : but Gale, Mosheim, Brucker (<hi rend="ital">Hist.
       Philos.</hi> period ii. pars i. lib. i. cap. ii. rect. 2.34), Fontanini (<hi rend="ital">Hist. Litt. Aquileiensis,</hi> p. 302, &amp;c.), to whom we have been much indebted, and
      Fabricius, identify the author with the elder Quintus Sextius (Quinti Sextii Patris), a Roman
      philosopher, mentioned with great encomiums by Seneca (<hi rend="ital">Epistol. 64,</hi>
      100.2). Seneca delighted much in a work of this Sextius, the title of which he does not give,
      but which he praises as written with great power. <quote xml:lang="la">Quantus in illo, Dii
       boni, vigor est, quantum animi! Hoc non in omnibus philosophis invenies. Quorumdam scripta
       clarum habent tantum nomen, caetera exsanguia sunt. Instituunt, disputant, cavillantur, non
       faciunt animum quia non habent. Quum legeris Sextium dices, Vivit, viget, liber est, supra
       hominem est; dimittit me plenum ingentis fiduciae. In quacunque positione mentis sim, quum
       hunc lego, fatebor tibi, libet omnes casus provocare, libet exclamare, Quid cessas, Fortuna ?
       congredere ! paratum vides</quote> (ibid.). It is observable that Seneca speaks of Sextius as
      a Stoic in reality but not in name. From other Epistles of Seneca (59.6, 63.11, 13, 98.13,
      108.17, and from his <title xml:lang="la">De Ira,</title> 2.36, 3.36) we learn that Sextius,
      though born of an illustrious family, had declined the dignity of senator when offered him by
      Julius Caesar ; that he abstained from animal food, though for different reasons than those
      ascribed to Pythagoras ; that he subjected himself to a scrupulous self-ex-amination at the
      close of each day; and that his philosophy, though expressed in the Greek language, was of
      Roman severity : --" Sextium ecce ... virum acrem, Graecis verbis, Romanis moribus,
      philosophantem." It appears that Sextius attempted, but in vain, to found a school of
      philosophy combining some features of the Pythagoreans with others of the Stoics; and which
      was consequently classed sometimes with one, and sometimes with the other of those sects.
      Seneca (<hi rend="ital">Natur. Quaest.</hi> 7.32) says, "Sextiorum nova et Romani roboris
      secta, inter initia sua, quum magno impetu coepisset, exstincta est." " Xystus Pythagoricus
      philosophus" is recorded in Jerome's version of the <title>Chronicon</title> of Eusebius as
      flourishing at the time of Christ's birth. He is also mentioned by Plutarch (<hi rend="ital">De Profect. Virtut. Sentent. Opp.</hi> vol. vi. p. 288, ed. Reiske), and by the elder Pliny
       (<hi rend="ital">H. Nat.</hi> 18.68, alibi).</p><div><head>Works</head><div><head><title>Sententiae</title></head><p>The contents of the <title>Sententiae</title> harmonize, on the whole, sufficiently well
        with this supposition of their authorship; the portions which seem to approximate most
        closely to the morality of the Christian religion, may perhaps have been interpolated or
        altered by Rufinus. The question of authorship, however, cannot be regarded as settled.
        There is difficulty in believing that a work once established in reputation as the work of a
        heathen writer, could have come to be so generally regarded as of Christian origin; though
        perhaps the difficulty would be somewhat diminished by the suggestion, that the work in its
        present form is not an original work of Sextius, but a selection of apophthegms culled from
        his writings, and that possibly by a Christian. The MSS. of the work vary very much both in
        the number and order of the aphorisms.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>The first edition of the <title>Sententiae</title> is that of Symphorianus <pb n="813"/> Champerius, 4to. Lyon, 1507, under the title of <title xml:lang="la">Enchiridion Sixti Philosophi Pythagorici.</title></bibl> The volume contains various
         pieces, of which the first is the work of Champerius, <hi rend="ital">de Quadruplici
          Vita.</hi> This edition is incorrectly described by Fabricius as entitled <title>Sixti s.
          Xysti Annulus.</title> The title <title>Annalus</title> was given to the work by Rufinus,
         as equivalent to the Greek <hi rend="ital">Enchiridion (Hand-book),</hi> because it should
         be always "in manibus," in (or on) the hands. The text of Champerius is said by Fontanini
         to be from one of the best MSS. <bibl>The <title>Sententiae</title> were again printed at
          Wittenberg, 4to. 1514, with the <title>Aurea Carmina</title> of Pythagoras</bibl>;
          <bibl>and again with various other pieces, by Beatus Rhenanus, 4to. Basil. 1516, under the
          title of <title xml:lang="la">Xysti Pythagorici Sententiae.</title></bibl></p><p>Various editions followed, but they omitted Rufinus's <hi rend="ital">Prologue.</hi> The
         work was also comprehended in <bibl>the various editions of De la Bigne's <hi rend="ital">Bibliotheca Patrum,</hi> where it appears as the work of Pope Sixtus, down to the Lyon
          edition of 1677.</bibl> It was <bibl>included, still without the <title>Prologue,</title>
          in the <title>Opuscula Mythologica, Ethica, et Physica</title> of Gale, 12mo. Cambridge,
          1670, 8vo. Amsterdam, 1688.</bibl>
         <bibl>The text of Rhenanus was reprinted, with <hi rend="ital">Observationes,</hi> designed
          to vindicate the title of Pope Sixtus II. to the authorship, by Urbanus Godofredus
          Siberus, 4to. Lipsiae, 1725.</bibl></p><p>The original Greek of some of the <title>Sententiae</title> has been traced in Origen,
         Nilus, Maximus, in the <title>Sententiae</title> of Demophilus and Democrates, and in
         Stobaeus.</p></div><div><head>Translations</head><p><bibl>An edition of the Latin text with a French version was published, 12mo. Paris,
          1843, by Le Comte C. P. de Lastayrie</bibl>, with the view of showing that as pure and
         elevated morality was to be found elsewhere as in the Christian Scriptures : the editor
         seems to have forgotten that the unsettled authorship of the work, and the interpolations
         of Rufinus rendered the work unsuitable for his purpose.</p></div></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Fabricius, <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Graec.</hi> vol. i. p. 870, &amp;c.; Fontanini, Brucker,
        <hi rend="ital">ll. cc. ;</hi> Gale, <hi rend="ital">Praefat. ad Opusc. Mytholoqica,
        &amp;c.</hi></p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.J.C.M">J.C.M</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>