<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:S.scato_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:S.scato_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="S"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="scato-bio-1" n="scato_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Scato</surname></persName></head><p>or CATO, VE'TTIUS, one of the Italian generals in the Marsic war, <date when-custom="-90">B. C.
       90</date>. He defeated the consul L. Julius Caesar, and then advanced against Aesernia, which
      was obliged to surrender through failure of provisions. He also defeated the other consul, P.
      Rutilius Lupus, who fell in the battle (Appian, <bibl n="App. BC 1.5.40">App. BC 1.40</bibl>,
       <bibl n="App. BC 1.5.41">41</bibl>, <bibl n="App. BC 1.5.43">43</bibl>). Cicero speaks of an
      interview at which he was present, between Vettius and Cn. Pompey (<hi rend="ital">Phil.</hi>
      12.11); and it is therefore not improbable that the P. Ventidius, who is said by Appian to
      have been one of the Italian generals that defeated the army of Cn. Pompey, is the same person
      as the subject of this article. (Appian, <bibl n="App. BC 1.6.47">App. BC 1.47</bibl>, with
      the note of Schweigh.) We learn from Seneca (<hi rend="ital">de Benef.</hi> 3.23), that
      Vettius was taken prisoner, and was stabbed to death by his own slave as he was being dragged
      before the Roman general, and that he was thus delivered from the ignominy and punishment that
      awaited him.</p><p>There is some difficulty respecting the orthography of the cognomen of Vettius. Appian calls
      him <hi rend="ital">Cato,</hi> and the Insteius Cato, mentioned by Velleius Paterculus (2.16)
      as one of the Italian generals in this war, is probably the same as this Vettius. In the best
      MSS. of Cicero (<hi rend="ital">l.c.</hi>), however, we find <hi rend="ital">Scato,</hi> which
      is probably the correct form, since <hi rend="ital">Scato</hi> occurs as a Marsic cognomen in
      the oration " Pro Domo" (100.44), and it was natural enough that the obscure name of Scato
      should be changed into the celebrated one of Cato. The praenomen of Vettius is also given
      differently. In Cicero (<hi rend="ital">l.c.</hi>) it is <hi rend="ital">Publius ;</hi> in
      Eutropius (<bibl n="Eutrop. 5.3">5.3</bibl>), <hi rend="ital">Titus ;</hi> in Seneca (<hi rend="ital">l.c.</hi>), <hi rend="ital">Caius :</hi> the first of these is probably the most
      correct.</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>