<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:S.sabinus_flavius_3</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:S.sabinus_flavius_3</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="S"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="sabinus-flavius-bio-3" n="sabinus_flavius_3"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><addName full="yes">Sabi'nus</addName>,
        <surname full="yes">Fla'vius</surname></persName></label></head><p>3. <persName xml:lang="la"><forename full="yes">T.</forename><surname full="yes">Flavius</surname><addName full="yes">Sabinus.</addName></persName> was consul suffectns with M. Caelius Sabins in May and
      June, A. D. 69. He was one of the generals appointed by Otho to oppose the forces of
      Vitellius, but after the victory of the latter he made his submission to the conqueror (<bibl n="Tac. Hist. 1.77">Tac. Hist. 1.77</bibl>, <bibl n="Tac. Hist. 2.36">2.36</bibl>,51). We
      have followed Tillemont (<hi rend="ital">Histoire des Emperers,</hi> "Note 1 sur Othon ") in
      making this T. Flavius Sabinus a different person from the praefect of the city mentioned
      above. Tacitus nowhere speaks of them as the same person, and it is moreover unlikely that the
      praefect of the city would have been sent away from Rome. Besides which, we find that after
      the death of Otho, the consul Flavius Sabinus caused his troops in the north of Italy to
      submit to the generals of Vitellius (<bibl n="Tac. Hist. 2.51">Tac. Hist. 2.51</bibl>), while
      the praefect of the city at the same time made the city cohorts at Rome swear allegiance to
      Vitellius (Tac. <hi rend="ital">Iist</hi>. 2.55). In addition to which we learn from
      inscriptions that the praenomen of the consul was <hi rend="ital">Titus.</hi> The praenomen of
      the praefect of the city is not mentioned by Tacitus, but it could not have been Titus, as
      that was the praenomen of Vespasian. A difficulty, however, still remains, namely, why the
      younger brother Vespasian bore the surname of his father contrary to the general usage. But to
      this we reply, that it may have happened in this case, as in others, that there was a brother
      older than the other two, named Titus, who died after the birth of the future praefect of the
      city, but before the birth of Vespasian, and that the praenomen of the father was then given
      to the child born next.</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>