<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:R.rufus_caecilius_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:R.rufus_caecilius_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="R"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="rufus-caecilius-bio-1" n="rufus_caecilius_1"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><addName full="yes">Rufus</addName>,
        <surname full="yes">Caeci'lius</surname></persName></label></head><p>1. <persName xml:lang="la"><forename full="yes">L.</forename><surname full="yes">Caecilius</surname><addName full="yes">Rufus</addName></persName>, the brother of P. Sulla by the same mother, but not by
      the same father, was tribune of the plebs, <date when-custom="-63">B. C. 63</date>, amid proposed
      soon after he had entered upon the office that his brother P. Sulla and Autronius Paetus, both
      of whom had been condemned on account of bribery in the consular comitia of <date when-custom="-66">B. C. 66</date>, should be allowed to become candidates again for the higher offices of the
      state, but dropt the proposal at the suggestion of his brother. In the course of his tribunate
      he rendered warm support to Cicero and the aristocratical party, and in particular opposed the
      agrarian law of Servilius Rullus. In his praetorship, <date when-custom="-57">B. C. 57</date>, he
      joined most of the other magistrates in proposing the recall of Cicero from banishment, and
      incurred in consequence the hostility of P. Clodius, whose hired mob attacked his house in the
      course of the same year. In <date when-custom="-54">B. C. 54</date>, he supported the accusation
      against Gabinius. (Cic. <hi rend="ital">pro Sull.</hi> 22, 23; comp. <bibl n="D. C. 37.25">D.
       C. 37.25</bibl>; Cic. <hi rend="ital">post Red. in Sen. 9, pro Mil.</hi> 14; Ascon. <hi rend="ital">in Mil.</hi> p. 48, ed. Orelli; Cic. <hi rend="ital">ad Q. Fr.</hi> 3.3.2.)</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>