<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:R.rufus_c_musonius_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:R.rufus_c_musonius_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="R"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="rufus-c-musonius-bio-1" n="rufus_c_musonius_1"><head><label xml:id="tlg-0628"><persName xml:lang="la"><addName full="yes">Rufus</addName>,
         <forename full="yes">C.</forename><surname full="yes">Muso'nius</surname></persName></label></head><p>a celebrated Stoic philosopher in the first century of the Christian era, was the son of a
      Roman eques of the name of Capito, and was born at Volsinii in Etruria, either at the end of
      the reign of Augustus, or the beginning of that of Tiberius. In consequence of his practising
      and inculcating the principles of the Porch, he became an object of suspicion and dislike at
      Nero's court, and was accordingly banished to the island of Gyaros, in <date when-custom="66">A. D.
       66</date>, under the pretext of his having been privy to the conspiracy uf Piso. The
      statement of Suidas (<hi rend="ital">s. v.</hi>), that he was put to death by Nero, is
      unquestionably erroneous. He returned from exile on the accession of Galba, and when Antonius
      Primus, the general of Vespasian, was marching upon Rome, he joined the ambassadors that were
      sent by Vitellius to the victorious general, and going among the soldiers of the latter,
      descanted upon the blessings of peace and the dangers of war, but was soon compelled to put an
      end to his unseasonable eloquence. When the party of Vitellius gained the upper hand, Musonius
      distinguished himself by accusing Publius Celer, by whose means Barea Soranus had been
      condemned, and he obtained the conviction of Publius. Musonius seems to have been held in high
      estimation by Vespasian, as he was allowed to remain at Rome when the other philosophers were
      banished from the city. The time of his death is not mentioned, but he was not alive in the
      reign of Trajan, when Pliny speaks of his sonin-law Artemidorus. (<bibl n="Tac. Ann. 14.59">Tac. Ann. 14.59</bibl>, <bibl n="Tac. Ann. 15.71">15.71</bibl>, <hi rend="ital">Hist.</hi>
      3.81, 4.10, 40; <bibl n="D. C. 62.27">D. C. 62.27</bibl>, <bibl n="D. C. 66.13">66.13</bibl>;
       <bibl n="Plin. Ep. 3.11">Plin. Ep. 3.11</bibl>; Philostr. <hi rend="ital">Vit. Apoll.</hi>
      4.35, 46, 7.16; Themist. <hi rend="ital">Orat.</hi> xiii. p. 173, ed. Hard.) The poet Rufus
      Festus Avienus was probably a descendant of Musonius. [See Vol. I. p. 433a.]</p><div><head>Works</head><p>Musonius wrote various philosophical works, which are spoken of by Suidas as <foreign xml:lang="grc">λόγοι διάφοροι φιλοσοφίας ἐχόμενοι.</foreign> Besides these Suidas
       mentions letters of his to Apollonius Tyanaeus, which were spurious. His opinions on
       philosophical subjects were also given in a work entitled, <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἀπομνημονεύματα Μουσωνίου τοῦ φιλοσόφου</foreign>, which Suidas attributes to
       Asinius Pollio of Tralles (<hi rend="ital">s. v.</hi>
       <foreign xml:lang="grc">Πωλίων</foreign>), but which must have been the work of a later
       writer of this name, as Asinius Pollio was a contemporary of Pompey. [See Vol. III. p. 439b.]
       The work of Pollio seems to have been an imitation of the Memorabilia of Xenophon, and it was
       probably this work that Stobaeus (<hi rend="ital">Floril.</hi> 29.78, 56.18), A. Gellius
        (<bibl n="Gel. 5.1">5.1</bibl>, <bibl n="Gel. 9.2">9.2</bibl>, <bibl n="Gel. 16.1">16.1</bibl>), Arrian, and other writers made use of, when they quote the opinions of
       Musonius.</p></div><div><head>Editions</head><p>All the extant fragments of his writings and opinions are carefully collected by
        <bibl>Peerlkamp</bibl>, in the work referred to below.</p></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p><bibl>Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Graec.</hi> vol. iii. pp. 566, 567</bibl>; <bibl>Ritter
        and Preller, <hi rend="ital">Historia Philosophiae,</hi> pp. 438-441</bibl>; <bibl>Niewland,
         <hi rend="ital">Dissert. Philos. Crit. de Musonio Rufoo,</hi> Amstelod. 1783</bibl>, which
       is reprinted by <bibl>Peerlkamp, in his <title xml:lang="la">C. Musonii Rufi Reliquiae et
         Apophthegmata,</title> Harlemi, 1822.</bibl></p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>