<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:R.rufus_antonius_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:R.rufus_antonius_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="R"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="rufus-antonius-bio-1" n="rufus_antonius_1"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><addName full="yes">Rufus</addName>,
        <surname full="yes">Anto'nius</surname></persName></label></head><p>the name of a Latin grammarian, quoted by Quintilian (1.5.43) and Velius Longus (p. 2237,
      ed. Putsch.). The Scholiast Cruquianus (ad Hor. <hi rend="ital">Ar. Poet.</hi> 288) speaks of
      an Antonius Rufus who wrote plays both praetextatae and togatae, but whether he is the same as
      the grammarian, must be left uncertain. Glandorp, in his <title xml:lang="la">Onomasticon</title> (p. 99), states on the authority of Acron that Antonius Rufus translated
      both Homer and Pindar, but there is no passage in Acron in which the name of Antonius Rufus
      occurs. Glandorp probably had in his mind the statement of the Scholiast on Horace already
      referred to. and connected it with a line in Ovid (<hi rend="ital">ex Pont.</hi> 4.16. 28), in
      which Rufus is spoken of as a lyric poet; but who this Rufus was, whether the same as Antonius
      Rufus or not, cannot be determined. (Wernsdorf, <hi rend="ital">Poetae Latini Minores.</hi>
      vol. iii. p. 30, vol. iv. p. 585.)</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>