<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.ptolemaeus_apion_29</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.ptolemaeus_apion_29</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="P"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="ptolemaeus-apion-bio-29" n="ptolemaeus_apion_29"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Ptolemaeus</surname><addName full="yes">Apion</addName></persName></label></head><p>(<persName xml:lang="grc"><surname full="yes">Πτολεμαῖος</surname><addName full="yes">Ἀπίων</addName></persName>) king of Cyrene, was an illegitimate son of Ptolemy
      Physcon, king of Egypt, by his mistress Eirene. His father left him by his will the kingdom of
      the Cyrenaica, to which he appears to have succeeded without opposition, on the death of
      Physcon, <date when-custom="-117">B. C. 117</date>. We know nothing of the events of his reign, but
      at his death in <date when-custom="-96">B. C. 96</date>, he bequeathed his kingdom by his will to
      the Roman people. The senate, however, refused to accept the legacy, and declared the cities
      of the Cyrenaica free. They were not reduced to the condition of a province till near thirty
      years afterwards; a circumstance which has given rise to much confusion, some of the later
      Roman writers having considered this latter date to be that of the death of Apion, and the
      accompanying bequest. Hence Sextus Rufus, Ammianus, and Hieronvmus were led to suppose that
      there were two kings of the name of Apion, an error in which they have been followed by
      Scaliger, Freinshemius, and other modern writers. The subject has been satisfactorily examined
      by Valesius in his notes to Ammianus, and by Clinton. (<bibl n="Just. 39.5">Just. 39.5</bibl>;
      Liv. <hi rend="ital">Epit.</hi> lxx.; Jul. Obsequens, 100.109 ; Eutrop. vi. ll; Sex. Ruf.
      100.13; <bibl n="Amm. 22.16.24">Amm. Marc. 22.16.24</bibl>; and Vales. <hi rend="ital">ad loc.
       ;</hi> Hieronym. <hi rend="ital">in Euseb. Chron.</hi> Ol. 171. 1, and Ol. 178. 3; Clinton,
       <hi rend="ital">F. H.</hi> vol. iii. p. 389, note.) </p><byline>[<ref target="author.E.H.B">E.H.B</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>