<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.prudentius_aurelius_clemens_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.prudentius_aurelius_clemens_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="P"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="prudentius-aurelius-clemens-bio-1" n="prudentius_aurelius_clemens_1"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><addName full="yes">Prude'ntius</addName>,
         <forename full="yes">Aure'lius</forename><surname full="yes">Clemens</surname></persName></label></head><p>Our acquaintance with the personal history of Prudentius, whom Bentley has designated as
      "the Horace and Virgil of the Christians," is derived exclusively from a short autobiography
      in verse, written when the poet was fifty-seven years old, and serving as an introduction to
      his works, of which it contains a catalogue. From this we gather that he was born during the
      reign of Constantius II. and Constans, in the consulship of Philippus and Salia, <date when-custom="348">A. D. 348</date>; that after acquiring, when a boy, the rudiments of liberal
      education, he fiequented, as a youth, the schools of the rhetoricians, indulging freely in
      dissipated pleasures ; that having attained to manhood, he practised as a forensic pleader;
      that he subsequently discharged the duties of a civil and criminal judge in two important
      cities; that he received front the emperor (Theodosius, probably, or Honorius), a high
      military appointment at court, which placed him in a station next to that of the prince, and
      that as he advanced in years, he became deeply sensible of the emptiness of worldly honour,
      and earnest in his devotion to the exercises of religion. Of his career after <date when-custom="405">A. D. 405</date>, or of the epoch of his death, we know nothing, for the praises
      of Stilicho, who suffered the penalty of his treason in 413, indicate that the piece in which
      they appear (<hi rend="ital">C. Symm.</hi> ii.) must have been published before that date, but
      can lead to no inference with regard to the decease of the author.</p><p>The above notices are expressed with so much brevity, and in terms so indefinite, that a
      wide field has been thrown open to critics for the exercise of ingenious learning in expanding
      and interpreting them. Every thing, however, beyond what we have stated, rests upon
      conjecture. We may, indeed, safely conclude that Prudentius was a Spaniard (see especially <hi rend="ital">Peristeph.</hi> 6.146); but the assertions with regard to the place of his birth,
      rest upon no sure foundation; for although he speaks of the inhabitants of Saragossa (<hi rend="ital">Peristeph.</hi> 4.1. comp. 97.) as "<hi rend="ital">noster</hi> populus," he uses
      elsewhere the self-same phrase with regard to Rome (<hi rend="ital">C. Symm.</hi> 1.192, comp.
      36), and applies the same epithet to Calahorra (<hi rend="ital">Peristeph.</hi> 1.116, 4.31),
      and to Tarragona (<hi rend="ital">Peristeph.</hi> 6.143). In like manner the attempts to
      ascertain the towns in which he discharged his judicial functions, and to determine the nature
      of the dignity to which he was eventually elevated, have proved entirely abortive. With regard
      to the latter, Gennadius concludes that he was what was called a <hi rend="ital">Palatinus
       miles,</hi> i. e. an officer of the household (Cod. Theod. 6. tit. 37), and certainly it is
      highly improbable that he ever was employed in active service; others imagine that he was
      consul, or praefect of the city -- or of the praetorium-- or that he was raised to the rank of
       <hi rend="ital">patrician</hi> -- opinions unsupported by even plausible arguments, and
      therefore not worth confuting.</p><div><head>Works</head><p>The extant poems of Prudentius, of which we now proceed to give a list, are composed in a
       great variety of metres, and these we shall describe as we go along.</p><div><head>I. <hi rend="ital">Praefatio,</hi></head><p><hi rend="ital">Praefatio,</hi> containing, as we have already remarked, an autobiography
        and a catalogue of the author's works. It extends to forty-five verses, and is composed in a
        stanza which would be termed technically <hi rend="ital">Tricolon Tristrophon,</hi> the
        first line being a Choriambic Dimeter, the second a Choriambic Trimeter, the third a
        Choriambic Tetrameter, all acatalectic, and all formed upon the Horatian model.</p></div><div><head>II. <hi rend="ital">Cathemerinon</hi></head><p><hi rend="ital">Cathemerinon</hi> (i.e. <foreign xml:lang="grc">καθημερινῶν
         ν̔μνῶν</foreign>) <hi rend="ital">Liber.</hi> A series of twelve hymns proper to be
        repeated or sung by the devout Christian; the first six at particular periods during each
        day; the remainder, with one exception, adapted to special occasions:--1. <hi rend="ital">Ad
         Gallicantum,</hi> 100 lines, Iambic Dim. Acat. 2. <hi rend="ital">Hymnus Matulinus.</hi>
        112 lines, same metre as the preceding. 3. <hi rend="ital">Hymnus ante cibum,</hi> 205
        lines, Pure Dactylic Trim. Hypercat. 4. <hi rend="ital">Hymnus post cibum,</hi> 102 lines,
        Phalaecian Hendecasyllabic. 5. <hi rend="ital">Hymnus ad incensum lucerne,</hi> 164 lines,
        Choriambic Trim. Acat. 6. <hi rend="ital">Hymnus ante somnum,</hi> 152 lines, Iambic Dim.
        Cat. 7. <hi rend="ital">Hymnus jejunantium,</hi> 220 lines, Iambic Trim. Acat. 8. <hi rend="ital">Hymnus post jejunium,</hi> 90 lines, Sapphic Stanza. 9. <hi rend="ital">Hymnus
         omni hora,</hi> 114 lines, Trochaic Tetram. Cat. 10. <hi rend="ital">Hymnus in exsequiis
         defunctorutn,</hi> 172 lines, Ana. <pb n="558"/> paestic Dim. Cat. 11. <hi rend="ital">Hymnus de natali Domini,</hi> 116 lines, Iambic Dim. Acat. 12. <hi rend="ital">Hymnus
         Epiphaniae,</hi> 208 lines, same metre as the preceding.</p></div><div><head>III. <hi rend="ital">Apotheosis.</hi></head><p><hi rend="ital">Apotheosis.</hi> On the divinity of Christ and his relation to the Father.
        The orthodox doctrine of the Trinity is here defended against the Sabellians, the Jews, the
        Ebionites, the Manichaeans, and other heretics, while various discussions are intermingled
        on the Nature of the Soul, on Original Sin. and on the Resurrection. We have first a <hi rend="ital">Praefatio</hi> of .56 lines in Iambic Trim. Acat. and Iambic Dim. Acat., placed
        alternately as in the first and second Epodes of Horace, after which follows the main body
        of the piece, comprised in 1084 heroic hexameters.</p></div><div><head>IV. <hi rend="ital">Hamartigenia</hi></head><p><hi rend="ital">Hamartigenia</hi> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἁμαρτιγένεια</foreign>).
        On the origin of evil and of sin, occupied chiefly with a refutation of the heresies of the
        Marcionites. We have first a <hi rend="ital">Praefatio</hi> of 63 lines in Iambic Trim.
        Acat., after which follows the main body of the piece, comprised in 965 heroic
        hexameters.</p></div><div><head>V. <hi rend="ital">Psychomachia.</hi></head><p><hi rend="ital">Psychomachia.</hi> The conflict and triumph of virtue in the soul of the
        Christian, especially of Faith, Chastity, Meekness, Humility, Moderation, Liberality, and
        Concord, against their antagonistic vices. We have first a <hi rend="ital">Praefatio</hi> of
        68 lines in Iambic Trim. Acat., after which follows the main body of the piece, comprised in
        915 heroic hexameters.</p></div><div><head>VI. <hi rend="ital">Contra Symmachum Liber I.</hi></head><p><hi rend="ital">Contra Symmachum Liber I.</hi> An exposure of the origin and worthlessness
        of the heathen Gods, together with an account of the conversion of Rome to Christianity. We
        have first a <hi rend="ital">Praefatio</hi> of 89 lines in Choriambic Trim. Acat., after
        which follows the main body of the piece comprised in 657 heroic hexameters.</p></div><div><head>VII. <hi rend="ital">Contra Symmachum Liber II.</hi></head><p><hi rend="ital">Contra Symmachum Liber II.</hi> A refutation of the statements and
        arguments in the celebrated petition presented by Symmachus [<ref target="symmachus-bio-3">SYMMACHUS</ref>] to the emperor Valentinian, praying for the restoration of the altar and
        statue of Victory, cast down by Gratian. We have a second preface of 66 lines in Choriambic
        Dim. Acat., followed by 1132 heroic hexameters.</p></div><div><head>VIII. <hi rend="ital">Peristephanon Liber</hi></head><p><hi rend="ital">Peristephanon Liber</hi> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">Περὶ
         στεφάνων</foreign>), a series of fourteen poems in honour of various saints, many of them
        Spanish. who had worn the crown of martyrdom. 1. <hi rend="ital">Passio Emeterii et
         Chelidonii Calagurilanorum Martyrum,</hi> 120 lines. Trochaic Tetram. Cat. 2. <hi rend="ital">Passio Laureutii Martyris</hi> 584 lines, Iambic Dim. Acat. 3. <hi rend="ital">In Honorem Eulaliae Virginis,</hi> 215 lines, Dactylic Trim. Hypercat. 4. <hi rend="ital">Passio XVIII. Martyrum Caesaraugustanorum,</hi> 200 lines, in the Sapphic Stanza. 5. <hi rend="ital">Passio Vincentii,</hi> 575 lines, Iambic Dim. Acat. 6. <hi rend="ital">In
         honorem B. Fructuosi episcopi Tarraconensis et Augurii et Euloyii Diaconorum,</hi> 162
        lines, Phalaecian hendecasyllabics. 7. <hi rend="ital">Passio Quirini episcopi ecclesiae
         Siscianae,</hi> 90 lines, Choriambic Dim. Acat. 8. <hi rend="ital">De loco quo Martyres
         passi sunt, nunc Baptisterium Calaguri,</hi> 18 lines in the Elegiac distich. 9. <hi rend="ital">Passio Cassiani,</hi> 106 lines, consisting of the heroic hexameter and Iambic
        Trim. Acat., placed alternately as in Hor. Epod. 16.10. <hi rend="ital">Romani Martyris
         Supplicium,</hi> 1140 lines, Iamlbic Trim. Acat. 11. <hi rend="ital">Passio Hippolyti
         Martyris,</hi> 246 lines in the Elegiac distich. 12. <hi rend="ital">Passio Petri et Pauli
         Apostolorum,</hi> 66 lines, in a distich consisting of a logaoedic verse placed alternately
        with the Iambic Trim. Cat., being the same measure as that employed by Horace. 100.1.4. 13.
         <hi rend="ital">Passio Cypriani Martyris,</hi> 106 lines, a system of the logaoedic verses
        employed in the preceding. 14. <hi rend="ital">Passio Agnetis Viryinis,</hi> a system of 133
        Alcaic Hendecasyllabic verses, the same with those which form the first two lines of the
        Alcaic stanza in Horace.</p></div><div><head>IX. <hi rend="ital">Diptychon</hi></head><p><hi rend="ital">Diptychon</hi> (or <hi rend="ital">Dittochaeon</hi>). Forty-eight
        tetrastichs in heroic hexameters relating to remarkable events and characters in Bible
        history, twenty-four being appropriated to those connected with the Old and twenty-four to
        those belonging to the New Testament. A keen controversy has arisen with regard to the
        authenticity of these summaries. They are not mentioned by Prudentius in his autobiography,
        when enumerating the rest of his productions, and they have been considered of an inferior
        stamp. Moreover, although find in all the best MSS., they are frequently placed, as it were
        apart, after the <title>Epilogus</title> mentioned below, thus indicating some suspicion in
        regard to the authorship, and in one codex they are ascribed to <hi rend="ital">Amaenus,</hi> which some suppose to be merely a complimentary epithet, while others,
        contending that it is a proper name, have called into existence an independent <hi rend="ital">Prudentius Amnaenus</hi> unheard of elsewhere. With regard to the title, we
        read in Gennadius that "Prudentius, vir seculari literatura eruditus, composuit <foreign xml:lang="grc">Αιττοχαῖον</foreign> de toto Veteri et Novo Testamento personis
        exceptis." Now, this <foreign xml:lang="grc">Αιττοχαῖον</foreign>, which has been
        interpreted to signify <hi rend="ital">cibum duplicem</hi> (i. e. the Old and New
        Testaments), appears under the varying shapes <hi rend="ital">Dittochaeon, Ditrochaeon,
         Dirochaeon, Diptychon,</hi> as the designation prefixed to the tetrastichs in the MSS., and
        we can scarcely doubt that <hi rend="ital">Diptychon</hi> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">Δίπτυχον</foreign>) is the true form, and that the rest are corruptions. On the whole,
        notwithstanding the formidable array of arguments in support of the opposite view of the
        question, there does not seem sufficient grounds for rejecting these little narratives as
        spurious, or for regarding them, as some have done, in the light of abridgements by a later
        hand, of a more voluminous original. The circumstance, that Prudentius does not include them
        in his list proves nothing, since they may have been written at a later period; and that
        something of the kind actually was written seems clear from the passage in Gennadius,
        obscure though it be.</p></div><div><head>X. <hi rend="ital">Epilogus,</hi></head><p><hi rend="ital">Epilogus,</hi> from which we may, perhaps, infer that the preceding pieces
        had been composed after Prudentius had withdrawn from public life ; thirty-four lines.
        Trochaic Dim. Cat. and Iambic Trim. Cat. placed alternately.</p></div><div><head>The <title>Hexaemeron</title> and the <title>Invitatio</title></head><p>The <title>Hexaemeron</title> and the <title>Invitatio</title> (or <hi rend="ital">Invitatorium</hi>) <hi rend="ital">ad Martyrium,</hi> placed by Gennadiua among the works
        of Prudentius, are no longer extant, and many doubt whether they ever existed. The clause in
        which the latter is named is so confused as to be almost unintelligible.</p></div></div><div><head>Assessment</head><p>Although considerable diversity of opinion has always prevailed with regard to the merits
       of Prudentius, it is hard to understand how he ever acquired that amount of reputation which
       he haundoubtedly enjoyed among many eminent modern scholars. We are not at all surprised by
       the admiration with which he was viewed in the middle ages; and we may not feel, perhaps,
       much astonished by the panegyrics even of Fabricius, Barth and Tillemont; but how one so
       acute as Bentley, a critic little addicted to hyperbolical commendation, could have employed
       the phrase <pb n="559"/> quoted at the beginning of this article is quite incomprehensible.
       If he intended simply to affirm that Prudentius stands first among Christian versifiers, we
       may perhaps, though not without hesitation, acquiesce in the decision, but the expression
       seems to imply high positive praise; and to this it is impossible to subscribe. His Latinity
       is not formed, like that of Juvencus and Victorinus, upon the best ancient models, but is
       confessedly impure, abounding both in words altogether barbarous, and in classical words
       employed in a barbarous sense, with here and there obsolete forms from Lucretius and the
       comedians, affectedly interspersed; he is totally ignorant or regardless of the common laws
       of prosody; the very nature of his theme in the Apotheosis and Hamartigenia, which are in
       fact treatises on the most abstruse questions of dogmatic and controversial theology,
       presents a complete barrier to creative efforts or to a play of fancy; and those effusions
       which afforded more latitude for a display of poetical talent are in no way remarkable. The
       hymns are not, as they ought to be, songs of praise and prayer and thanksgiving, but are
       didactic essays, loaded with moral precepts and doctrinal subtleties, while the sufferings of
       the martyrs, which form the subject of the Peristephanon, are for the most part detailed with
       heavy spiritless prolixity. His powers appear to greater advantage in the books against
       Symmachus than in any other portion of his works, and the dirge "In Exsequiis defunctorum"
       (Cathem. x.) is perhaps the best specimen of his lyric style.</p></div><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>The earliest edition of Prudentius bearing a date is that printed at Deventer in
        1472, and this is generally accounted the Princeps.</bibl> By far the most complete and
       splendid is that of <bibl>Faustinus Arevalus, 2 vols. 4to. Rom. 1788 and 1789</bibl>, but for
       all ordinary purposes that of <bibl>Obbarius (8vo. Tubing. 1845)</bibl>, whose Prolegomena
       embrace a large amount of information condensed into a small compass, will be found
       satisfactory. The edition of <bibl>Weitzius (8vo. Hann. 1613)</bibl> contains a complete
       collection of the earlier commentaries, and those of <bibl>Chamillard, 4to. Paris, 1687 (in
        usum Delph.)</bibl>, of <bibl>Cellarius, 8vo. Hal. 1703, 1739</bibl>, and of <bibl>Teolius
        (2 vols. 4to. Parm. 1788)</bibl>, are considered valuable. These poems will be found also in
       the <bibl><title>Bibliotheca Patrum Max.</title> fol. Lug. Bat. 1677, vol. v. p. 990</bibl>,
       and in the collections of <bibl>Fabricius</bibl> and <bibl>Maittaire</bibl></p></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Gennad. (<hi rend="ital">de Viris Ill.</hi> 13; J. P. Ludwig, <hi rend="ital">Dissert. de
        Vita A. Prudentii,</hi> Viteb. 4to. 1642; J. Le Clerque, <hi rend="ital">Vie de
        Prudence,</hi> Amst. 1689; II. Middeldorpf, <hi rend="ital">Comment. de Prudentio et
        Theologia Prudentiana,</hi> pt. 1.4to. Vratisl. 1823.) pt. 2.4to. Vratisl. 1827.</p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.W.R">W.R</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>