<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.primus_m_antonius_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.primus_m_antonius_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="P"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="primus-m-antonius-bio-1" n="primus_m_antonius_1"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><addName full="yes">Primus</addName>, <forename full="yes">M.</forename><surname full="yes">Anto'nius</surname></persName></label></head><p>was born at Tolosa in Gaul, and received in his boyhood the surname of <hi rend="ital">Becco,</hi> which signified in the Gallic language a cock's beak. (Suet. <hi rend="ital">Vitell.</hi> 18; Martial, <bibl n="Mart. 9.100">9.100</bibl>,) He afterwards went to Rome,
      and rose to the dignity of a senator; but having been condemned of forgery (<hi rend="ital">falsum</hi>) under the lex Cornelia in the reign of Nero, he was expelled from the senate,
      and banished from the city. (<bibl n="Tac. Ann. 14.40">Tac. Ann. 14.40</bibl>; <bibl n="D. C. 65.9">D. C. 65.9</bibl>). After the death of Nero (<date when-custom="68">A. D.
      68</date>), he was restored to his former rank by Galba, and appointed to the command of the
      seventh legion, which was stationed in Pannonia. It was believed that he subsequently wrote to
      Otho, offering to take the command of his forces; but as Otho would not employ him, he gave
      him no support in his struggle with Vitellius. When the fortunes of the latter began to
      decline (<date when-custom="69">A. D. 69</date>), Antonius was one of the first generals in Europe
      who declared in favour of Vespasian; and he rendered him the most important services. He was
      well fitted to play a conspicuous part in a civil war, being bold in action, ready in speech,
      unscrupulous in the use of means, equally ready to plunder and to bribe, and possessing
      considerable military abilities. It was by his influence that the legions in Moesia, as well
      as those in Pannonia, espoused the side of Vespasian. When the other generals of Vespasian
      were of opinion that they should remain in Pannonia, and await the arrival of Mucianus, who
      was marching from the East at the head of a powerful body of Vespasian's troops, Antonius on
      the contrary urged an immediate invasion of Italy. His energy overruled all opposition.
      Without waiting till the army was ready, Antonius, with a small body of picked troops, and
      accompanied by Arrius Varus, who had gained great renown under Corbulo in the Armenian war,
      crossed the Alps and pushed forwards into Italy. Here he met with great success; he obtained
      possession of several towns in Transpadane Gaul, and at Patavium was joined by two legions
      which had followed him from the north. At Patavium he allowed his troops a short time for
      repose, and then marched upon Verona, which also fell into his power. Meantime Alienus
      Caecina, who had been sent by Vitellius at the head of a large army to oppose Antonius,
      adopted no active measures against him, though with his superior forces he might easily have
      driven him out of Italy. Shortly afterwards three more legions crossed the Alps and joined
      Antonius, who was now at the head of five legions. His authority however was shared by two
      generals of consular rank, T. Ampius Flavianus, the governor of Pannonia, and Aponius
      Saturninus, the governor of Moesia; but an insurrection of the soldiers delivered him from
      these rivals, and obliged them to flee from the camp. Antonius affected great indignation at
      these proceedings, but it was believed by many that the mutiny had been instigated by himself
      that he might obtain the sole command. The army of Caecina meanwhile had been thrown into
      great confusion by the treason of their general Caecina, who had endeavoured to persuade his
      troops to desert Vitellius and espouse the cause of Vespasian; but not succeeding in his
      attempt, he had been thrown into chains, and new generals elected by the soldiers in his
      stead. Antonius resolved to avail himself of these favourable circumstances for making an
      immediate attack upon the army of Vitellius. He accordingly broke up from his quarters at
      Verona, and advanced as far as Bedriacum, a small town at no great distance from Cremona. At
      Bedriacum the decisive battle was fought. The imprudence of Arrius Varus, who had charged the
      enemy too soon and was driven back with loss, threw the army of Antonius into confusion, and
      nearly caused the loss of the battle. Antonius only arrested the flight by killing one of his
      own standard-bearers who was in the act of flying, and by leading the men against the enemy
      with the standard in his hand. Victory at length declared for Antonius, and the enemy fled in
      confusion to Cremona, from which town they had marched to Bedriacum. In the night Antonius was
      attacked by another army of Vitellius, consisting of six legions, which had been stationed at
      Hostilia, thirty miles distant, and which had immediately <pb n="524"/> set out against
      Antonius upon hearing of the defeat of their comrades. The skill and valour of Antonius again
      secured the victory for his troops after another hard-fought battle. In the morning he marched
      against Cremona, which was at length obliged to submit to him after a vigorous defence. The
      unhappy city was given up to plunder and flames; and at the end of four days of incessant
      pillage, during which the most horrible atrocities were perpetrated, the entire city was
      levelled to the ground.</p><p>Hitherto Antonius had acted with moderation and caution; but, as frequently happens, success
      revealed his cruel character, and brought forth to public view the avarice, pride, and other
      vices which were inherent in his nature. Henceforth he treated Italy like a conquered country;
      and in order to maintain his popularity with the soldiers. allowed them every kind of licence.
      Mucianus, who was jealous of his success, and who wished to reserve to himself the glory of
      putting an end to the war, wrote to Antonius, recommending caution and delay, though he worded
      his letters in such a manner that the responsibility of all movements was thrown upon
      Antonius. But to the officers of Antonius he expressed himself with more openness, and thus
      endeavoured to keep Antonius in the north of Italy. Antonius, however, was not of a temper to
      brook such interference, and he therefore wrote to Vespasian, extolling his own exploits, and
      covertly attacking Mucianus. Without troubling himself about the wishes of the latter, he
      crossed the Apennines in the middle of winter, and marched straight upon Rome. Upon reaching
      Ocriculum, however, he halted for some days. His soldiers, whose appetites had been whetted by
      the plunder of Cremona, and who were impatient to glut themselves with the spoils of Rome,
      were indignant at this delay, and accused their general of treachery. It is probable that
      Antonius, who saw that it would be difficult to restrain his soldiers, feared the general
      odium, as well as the displeasure of Vespasian, if his troops were to sack the imperial city.
      But whatever were his motives or intentions, circumstances occurred which put an end to his
      inactivity. News arrived that Flavius Sabinus had taken refuge in the Capitol, and that he was
      there besieged by the Vitellian troops. Thereupon Antonius immediately marched upon Rome, but
      before he could reach the city the Capitol was burnt, and Sabinus killed. Upon arriving at the
      suburbs, he endeavoured to prevent his troops from entering the city till the following day;
      but the soldiers, who saw the prey before their eyes, demanded to be led forthwith to the
      attack. Antonius was obliged to yield; he divided his army into three bodies, and gave orders
      for the assault. The troops of Vitellius fought with the courage of despair; driven out of the
      suburbs, they continued the combat in the streets of the city, and the struggle continued for
      many days. At length the work of butchery came to an end; the soldiers of Vitellius were
      everywhere destroyed, and the emperor himself put to death. Thereupon Domitian, who was in
      Rome, received the name of Caesar; Arrius Varus was entrusted with the command of the
      Praetorian troops; but the government and all real power was in the hands of Antonius. His
      rapacity knew no bounds, and he kept plundering the emperor's palace, as if he had been at the
      sack of Cremona. The subservient senate voted him the consular ornaments ; but his rule lasted
      only for a short time. Mucianus reached Rome soon after the death of Vitellius, and was
      immediately received by the senate and the whole city, as their master. But though Antonius
      was thus reduced to a subordinate position in the state, Mucianus was still jealous of him.
      He, therefore, would not allow him to accompany Domitian in his expedition into Germany; at
      which Antonius was so indignant that he repaired to Vespasian, who was at Alexandria. He was
      not received by Vespasian in the distinguished manner which he had expected, and to which he
      thought that he was entitled; for though the emperor treated him with kindness and
      consideration on account of the great services he had rendered him, he secretly regarded him
      with dislike and suspicion, in consequence of the accusations of Mucianus, and the haughty
      conduct of Antonius himself.</p><div><head>Further Information</head><p><bibl n="Tac. Hist. 2.86">Tac. Hist. 2.86</bibl>, libb. iii.__iv.; <bibl n="D. C. 65.9">D.
        C. 65.9</bibl>-<bibl n="D. C. 65.18">18</bibl>; Joseph. <hi rend="ital">B. J.</hi> 4.11.)
       This is the last time that Antonius is mentioned by Tacitus ; but we learn from Martial, who
       was a friend of Antonius, that he was alive at the accession of Trajan. In an epigram of the
       tenth book, which was probably published in <date when-custom="100">A. D. 100</date>, the second
       year of Trajan's reign [see Vol. II. p. 965b.], Antonius is said to be in his sixtieth year.
        (<bibl n="Mart. 10.23">Mart. 10.23</bibl>, comp. 10.32, 9.100.</p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>