<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.potitus_valerius_3</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.potitus_valerius_3</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="P"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="potitus-valerius-bio-3" n="potitus_valerius_3"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><addName full="yes">Poti'tus</addName>,
        <surname full="yes">Vale'rius</surname></persName></label></head><p>2. <persName xml:lang="la"><forename full="yes">L.</forename><surname full="yes">Valerius</surname><addName full="yes">Potitus</addName></persName>, consul with M. Horatius Barbatus, In <date when-custom="-449">B. C. 449</date>. Dionysius calls him a grandson of the great P. Valerius
      Publicola, and a son of the P. Valerius Publicola, who was consul in <date when-custom="-460">B. C.
       460</date>, and who was killed that year in the assault of the Capitol, which had been seized
      by Herdonius (<bibl n="Dionys. A. R. 11.4">Dionys. A. R. 11.4</bibl>); and hence we find him
      described as L. Valerius <hi rend="ital">Publicola</hi> Potitus. But we think it more probable
      that he was the son or grandson of L.Valerius Potitus [No. 1]; first, because we find that
      Livy, Cicero, and Dionysius, invariably give him the surname of Potitus, and never that of
      Publicola, and secondly because the great popularity of Potitus would naturally give origin to
      the tradition that he was a lineal descendant of that member of the gens, who took such a
      prominent part in the expulsion of the kings.</p><p>The annals of the Valeria gens recorded that L. Valerius Potitus was the first person who
      offered opposition to the decemvirs; and whether this was the case or not, there can be no
      doubt that he took a leading part in the abolition of the tyrannical power. He and M. Horatius
      are represented as the leaders of the people against Ap. Claudius after the murder of Virginia
      by her father; and when the plebeians had seceded to the Sacred Hill, he and Horatius were
      sent to them by the senate, as the only acceptable members, to negotiate the terms of peace.
      In this mission they succeeded; the decemvirate was abolished, and the two friends of the
      plebs, Valerius and Horatius, were elected consuls, <date when-custom="-449">B. C. 449</date>. Their
      consulship is memorable by the <pb n="515"/> enactment of the celebrated <hi rend="ital">Valeriae et Horatiae leges,</hi> which secured the liberties of the plebs, and gave them
      additional power in the state. 1. The first law is said to have made a plebiscitum binding on
      the whole people, but Niebuhr supposes that the curiae were necessary to give a plebiscitum
      the full force of a lex. [Comp. <hi rend="smallcaps">PHILO</hi>, p. 298a.] 2. The second law
      enacted that whoever should procure the election of a magistrate without appeal should be
      outlawed, and might be killed by any one with impunity. 3. The third law declared that,
      whoever harmed the tribunes of the plebs, the aediles, the judices, or the decemvirs, should
      be outlawed and accursed. It is doubtful who are meant by the judices and decemvirs : various
      conjectures have been made on the point by modern writers (Niebuhr, <hi rend="ital">Hist. of
       Rome,</hi> vol. ii. p. 368; Arnold, <hi rend="ital">list. of Rome,</hi> vol. i. p. 319).
      After the enactmeat of these laws, the consuls proceeded to march against the foreign enemies
      of the state. The people flocked to the standards of the popular consuls, and fought with
      enthusiasm under their orders. They accordingly met with great success; Valerius defeated the
      Aequi and the Volsci, Horatius the Sabines, and both armies returned to Rome covered with
      glory. The senate, however, refused to grant a triumph to these traitors to their order;
      whereupon the centuries conferred upon them this honour by their supreme authority, regardless
      of the opposition of the senate. (<bibl n="Liv. 3.39">Liv. 3.39</bibl>_<bibl n="Liv. 3.41">41</bibl>, <bibl n="Liv. 3.49">49</bibl>_<bibl n="Liv. 3.55">55</bibl>,61-64 ; <bibl n="Dionys. A. R. 11.4">Dionys. A. R. 11.4</bibl>, &amp;100.45, &amp;c.; Cic. <hi rend="ital">de Rep.</hi> 2.31, <hi rend="ital">Brut.</hi> 14; Niebuhr, <hi rend="ital">Hist. of
       Rome,</hi> vol. ii. pp. 345-376.) In <date when-custom="-446">B. C. 446</date> Valerius was chosen
      by the centuries one of the quaestores parricidii (<bibl n="Tac. Ann. 11.22">Tac. Ann.
       11.22</bibl>; respecting the statement in Tacitus, see <hi rend="ital">Dict. of Antiq. s. v.
       Quaestor</hi>).</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>