<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.potamius_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.potamius_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="P"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="potamius-bio-1" n="potamius_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Pota'mius</surname></persName></head><p>a Spaniard by birth, was bishop of Lisbon in the middle of the fourth century; and if the
      first of the pieces mentioned below be genuine, he must, in the early part of his career, have
      been a champion of the Catholic faith.</p><p>Subsequently, however, he was a zealous Arian, and it is believed that he drew up the
      document known in ecclesiastical history as <hi rend="ital">The second Sirmian Creed.</hi>
       [<hi rend="smallcaps">PHOEBADIUS.</hi>]</p><div><head>Works</head><p>The writings usually ascribed to Potamius are:--</p><div><head>1. <title xml:lang="la">Epistola ad Athanasium Episcopum Alexandrinum de
         Consubstantialitate Filii Dei</title></head><p>In some MSS. this work is entitled <title>Epistola Potamii ad Athanasium ab Arianis
         (impetitum ?) postquam in Concilio Ariminensi subscripserunt,</title> composed in the year
         <date when-custom="355">A. D. 355</date>, while the opinions of the author were yet orthodox. The
        authenticity of this piece, however, which is characterised by great obscurity of thought
        and of expression, and often half barbarous in phraseology, is very doubtful.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>It was first published by the Benedictine D'Achery, in his <title xml:lang="la">Spicilegium veterum aliquot Scriptorum,</title> 4to. Paris, 1661, vol. ii.p. 366</bibl>,
         or <bibl>vol. iii. p. 299, of the new edition by Baluze, fol. 1717</bibl>, and <bibl>will
          be found under its best form in Galland's <title xml:lang="la">Bibliotheca Patrum,</title>
          vol. v. fol. Venet. 1769, p. 96.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>2. <title xml:lang="la">Sermo de Lazaro,</title> and 3. <title xml:lang="la">Sermo de
         Martyrio Esaiae Prophetae.</title></head><p>Two discourses resembling in style the epistle to Athanasius, long attributed to Zeno,
        bishop of Verona.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>These were published, without suspicion, among the works of Zeno</bibl>, until the
         brothers Ballerini (<title xml:lang="la">S. Zenonis Sermones,</title> fol. Venet. 1739, p.
         297-303) proved that they must be assigned to Potamius, whom however they supposed to be a
         person altogether different from the bishop of Lisbon, and belongiag <pb n="513"/> to a
         different age. The arguments which they employ to demonstrate this last position are
         founded upon the second title of the <title>Epistola ad Athanasium</title> as given above,
         but this title Galland. Schoenemann, and others, hold to be the blunder of an ignorant
         transcriber. <bibl>The <title>Sermones</title> will be found in Galland</bibl>, and the
         discussions with regard to the real author in the Prolegomena to the volume, cap. x. p.
         xvii. </p></div></div></div><byline>[<ref target="author.W.R">W.R</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>