<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.pompeius_10</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.pompeius_10</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="P"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="pompeius-bio-10" n="pompeius_10"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Pompeius</surname></persName></head><p>9. <persName xml:lang="la"><forename full="yes">Q.</forename><surname full="yes">Pompeius</surname><addName full="yes">Rufus</addName></persName>, son of No. 8, and grandson of the dictator Sulla, first
      appears in public in <date when-custom="-54">B. C. 54</date> as the accuser of M. Messalla, because
      he had gained his election to the consulship by bribery. [<hi rend="smallcaps">MESSALLA</hi>,
      No. 7.] He was tribune of the plebs <date when-custom="-52">B. C. 52</date>, and not <date when-custom="-53">B. C. 53</date>, as Dio Cassius states (40.45). In his tribuneship he
      distinguished himself as the great partizan of the triumvir Pompey. The latter longed for the
      dictatorship, and therefore secretly fomented the disturbances at Rome, in hopes that all
      parties tired of anarchy would willingly throw themselves into his arms. Rufus supported his
      views, and to increase the confusion would not allow any of the elections to be held. There
      seemed an end of all government. The senate apprehended Rufus and cast him into prison,
      notwithstanding his sacred character as tribune; but this act of violence only strengthened
      his power and influence. He retaliated by throwing into prison one of the most active
      supporters of the senatorial party, the aedile Favonius. The murder of Clodius by Milo on the
      20th of January still further favoured the views of the triumvir ; Rufus and his colleague
      Munatius Plancus added fuel to the fire, and omitted no means for increasing the wrath of the
      people. Pompey was appointed sole consul; the laws which he proposed were supported by Rufus
      and his party, and Milo was condemned. But he had no sooner laid down his office of tribune,
      on the 10th of December in this year, than he was accused by one of his late colleagues, M.
      Caelius, of violating the very law <hi rend="ital">De Vi,</hi> which he had taken so active a
      part in passing. He was condemned, and lived in exile at Bauli in Campania. Here he was in
      great pecuniary difficulties, till M. Caelius, who had accused him, generously compelled his
      mother Cornelia to surrender to him his paternal property. The last time that Rufus is
      mentioned is in <date when-custom="-51">B. C. 51</date>, when his enemies spread the false report
      that he had murdered Cicero on his journey to Cilicia. (Cic. <hi rend="ital">ad Q. Fr.</hi>
      3.2.3, <hi rend="ital">ad Att.</hi> iv. ]6.8; <bibl n="D. C. 40.45">D. C. 40.45</bibl>, <bibl n="D. C. 40.49">49</bibl>, <bibl n="D. C. 40.55">55</bibl>; Ascon. <hi rend="ital">in Cic.
       Milon.</hi> passim ; Caelius, <hi rend="ital">ad Fam.</hi> 8.1.4; <bibl n="V. Max. 4.2.7">V.
       Max. 4.2.7</bibl>.)</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>