<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.pleuratus_2</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.pleuratus_2</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="P"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="pleuratus-bio-2" n="pleuratus_2"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Pleuratus</surname></persName></head><p>2. King of Illyria, son of Scerdilaidas, and therefore probably a grandson of the preceding.
      He appears to have been associated with his father in the sovereignty for some years before
      the death of the latter, whether as joint ruler, or as holding the separate command of some of
      the Illyrian tribes, is uncertain, but the last supposition seems the most probable. Livy, in
      one passage (26.24), calls him a Thracian prince, but this seems to be certainly a mistake.
      His name was included, together with that of Scerdilaidas in the treaty of alliance concluded
      by M. Valerius Laevinus with the Aetolians, <date when-custom="-211">B. C. 211</date>, and the two
      were associated together on several occasions during the war with Philip, as well as in the
      peace concluded by P. Sempronius with that monarch in <date when-custom="-204">B. C. 204</date>.
       (<bibl n="Liv. 26.24">Liv. 26.24</bibl>, <bibl n="Liv. 27.30">27.30</bibl>, <bibl n="Liv. 28.5">28.5</bibl>, <bibl n="Liv. 29.12">29.12</bibl>; Polyb 10.41.) But after this
      period that of Pleuratus appears alone, and he seems to have become sole ruler. On the renewal
      of the war with Macedonia by the Romans (<date when-custom="-201">B. C. 201</date>) he hastened to
      offer his assistance to the consul Sulpicius, but his services were declined for the moment,
      and were not subsequently called for. But though he rendered no active assistance, his
      fidelity to the Roman cause was rewarded by Flamininus at the peace of 196, by the addition to
      his territories of Lychnidus and the Parthini, which had been previously subject to Macedonia.
       (<bibl n="Liv. 31.28">Liv. 31.28</bibl>, <bibl n="Liv. 33.34">33.34</bibl>; <bibl n="Plb. 18.30">Plb. 18.30</bibl>, <bibl n="Plb. 21.9">21.9</bibl>, <bibl n="Plb. 22.4">22.4</bibl>.) During the war of M. Fulvius in Aetolia, <date when-custom="-189">B. C. 189</date>,
      he again came to the assistance of the Romans with a fleet of 60 ships, with which he laid
      waste the coasts of Aetolia, but did not effect any thing of moment. (<bibl n="Liv. 38.7">Liv.
       38.7</bibl>.) The date of his death is unknown, but it must have occurred previous to <date when-custom="-180">B. C. 180</date>, at which time we find his son Gentius already on the throne.
      (Id. 40.42.)</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>