<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.pindarus_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.pindarus_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="P"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="pindarus-bio-1" n="pindarus_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la" xml:id="tlg-0033"><surname full="yes">Pi'ndarus</surname></persName></head><p>(<persName xml:lang="grc"><surname full="yes">Πίνδαρος</surname></persName>), the greatest lyric
      poet of Greece, according to the universal testimony of the ancients. Just as Homer was called
      simply <foreign xml:lang="grc">ὁ ποιητής</foreign>, Aristophanes <foreign xml:lang="grc">ὁ κωμικός</foreign>, and Thucydides <foreign xml:lang="grc">ὁ συγγραφεύς</foreign>, in
      like manner Pindar was distinguished above all other lyric poets by the title of <foreign xml:lang="grc">ὁ λυρικός.</foreign> Our information however respecting his life is very
      scanty and meagre, being almost entirely derived from some ancient biographies of uncertain
      value and authority. Of these we possess five; one prefixed by Thomas Magister to his Scholia
      on the poet; a second in Suidas; a third usually called the metrical life, because it is
      written in thirty-five hexameter lines; a fourth first published by Schneider in his edition
      of Nicander, and subsequently reprinted by Böckh along with the three other preceding
      lives in his edition of Pindar; and a fifth by Eustathius, which was published for the first
      time by Tafel in his edition of the Opuscula of Eustathius, Frankfort, 1832.</p><p>Pindar was a native of Boeotia, but the ancient biographies leave it uncertain whether he
      was born at Thebes or at Cynoscephalae, a village in the territory of Thebes. All the ancient
      biographies agree that his parents belonged to Cynoscephalae ; but they might easily have
      resided at Thebes, just as in Attica an Acharnian or a Salaminian might have lived at Athens
      or Eleusis. The name of Pindar's parents is also differently stated. His father is variously
      called Daiphantus, Pagondas, or Scopelinus, his mother Cleidice, Cleodice or Myrto; but some
      of these persons, such as Scopelinus and Myrto, were probably only his teachers in music and
      poetry; and it is most likely that the names of his real parents were Daiphantus and Cleidice,
      which are alone mentioned in the "Metrical Life" of Pindar already referred to. The year of
      his birth is likewise a disputed point. He was born, as we know from his own testimony (<hi rend="ital">Fragm.</hi> 102, ed. Dissen), during the celebration of the Pythian games.
      Clinton places his birth in Ol. 65. 3, <date when-custom="-518">B. C. 518</date>, Böckh in Ol.
      64. 3, <date when-custom="-522">B. C. 522</date>, but neither of these dates is certain, though the
      latter is perhaps the most probable. He probably died in his 80th year, though other accounts
      make him much younger at the time of his death. If he was born in <date when-custom="-522">B. C.
       522</date>, his death would fall in <date when-custom="-442">B. C. 442</date>. He was in the prime
      of life at the battles of Marathon and Salamis, and was nearly of the same age as the poet
      Aeschylus; but, as K. O. Miller has well remarked, the causes which determined Pindar's
      poetical character are to be sought in a period previous to the Persian war, and in the Doric
      and Aeolic parts of Greece rather than in Athens; and thus we may separate Pindar from his
      contemporary Aeschylus, by placing the former at the close of the early period, the latter at
      the head of the new period of literature. One of the ancient biographies mentions that Pindar
      married Megacleia, the daughter of Lysitheus and Callina; another gives Timoxena as the name
      of his wife; but he may have married each in succession. He had a son, Daiphantus, and two
      daughters, Eumetis and Protomacha.</p><p>The family of Pindar ranked among the noblest <pb n="368"/> in Thebes. It was sprung from
      the ancient race of the Aegids, who claimed descent from the Cadmids, who settled at Thebes
      and Sparta, whence part emigrated to Thera and Cyrene at the command of Apollo. (<bibl n="Pind. P. 5.72">Pind. P. 5.72</bibl>, &amp;c.) We also learn from the biography by
      Eustathius, that Pindar wrote the <foreign xml:lang="grc">δαφνηφορικὸν ᾀσμα</foreign> for
      his son Daiphantus, when he was elected <hi rend="ital">daphnephorts</hi> to conduct the
      festival of the <hi rend="ital">daphnephsoria ;</hi> a fact which proves the dignity of the
      family, since only youths of the most distinguished families at Thebes were eligible to this
      office. (<bibl n="Paus. 9.10.4">Paus. 9.10.4</bibl>.) The family seems to have been celebrated
      for its skill in music; though there is no authority for stating, as Bückh and
      Müller have done, that they were hereditary flute-players, and exercised their profession
      regularly at certain great religious festivals. The ancient biographies relate that the father
      or uncle of Pindar was a flute-player, and we are told that Pindar at an early age received
      instruction in the art from the flute-player Scopelinus. But the youth soon gave indications
      of a genius for poetry, which induced his father to send him to Athens to receive more perfect
      instruction in the art; for it must be recollected that lyric poetry among the Greeks was so
      intimately connected with music, dancing, and the whole training of the chorus that the lyric
      poet required no small amount of education to fit him for the exercise of his profession.
      Later writers tell us that his future glory as a poet was miraculously foreshadowed by a swarm
      of bees which rested upon his lips while he was asleep, and that this miracle first led him to
      compose poetry. (Comp. <bibl n="Paus. 9.23.2">Paus. 9.23.2</bibl>; Aelian, <bibl n="Ael. VH 12.45">Ael. VH 12.45</bibl>.) At Athens Pindar became the pupil of Lasus of
      Hermione, the founder of the Athenian school of dithyrambic poetry, and who was at that time
      residing at Athens under the patronage of Hipparchus. Lasus was well skilled in the different
      kinds of music, and from him Pindar probably gained considerable knowledge in the theory of
      his art. Pindar also received instruction at Athens from Agathocles and Apollodorus, and one
      of them allowed him to instruct the cyclic choruses, though he was still a mere youth. the
      returned to Thebes before he had completed his twentieth year, and is said to have received
      instruction there from Myrtis and Corinna of Tanagra, two poetesses, who then enjoyed great
      celebrity in Boeotia. Corinna appears to have exercised considerable influence upon the
      youthful poet, and he was not a little indebted to her example and precepts. It is related by
      Plutarch (<hi rend="ital">De Glor. Athen.</hi> 14), that she recommended Pindar to introduce
      mythical narrations into his poems, and that when in accordance with her advice he composed a
      hymn (part of which is still extant), in which he interwove almost all the Theban mythology,
      she smiled and said, "We ought to sow with the hand, and not with the whole sack" (<foreign xml:lang="grc">τῇ χειρὶ δεῖν σπείρειν, ἀλλὰ μὴ ὅλψ τῷ θυλάκψ</foreign>). With
      both these poetesses I'indar contended for the prize in the musical contests at Thebes.
      Although Corinna found fault with Myrtis for entering into the contest with Pindar, saying, "I
      blame the clear-toned Myrtis, that she, a woman born, should enter the lists with Pindar,"</p><p><foreign xml:lang="grc">Μέμφομη δὲ κὴ λιγούραν Μούρτιδʼ ἱώνγα<lb/> ὅτι βάνα
       φοῦσʼ ἔβα Πινδάροιό ποτʼ ἔριν</foreign> : still she herself is said to have contended
      with him five times, and on each occasion to have gained the prize. Pausanias indeed does not
      speak (9.22.3) of more than one victory, and mentions a picture which he saw at Tanagra, in
      which Corinna was represented binding her hair with a fillet in token of her victory, which he
      attributes as much to her beauty and to the circumstance that she wrote in the Aeolic dialect
      as to her poetical talents.</p><p>Pindar commenced his professional career as a poet at an early age, and acquired so great a
      reputation, that he was soon employed by different states and princes in all parts of the
      Hellenic world to compose for them choral songs for special occasions. He received money and
      presents for his works; but he never degenerated into a common mercenary poet, and he
      continued to preserve to his latest days the respect of all parts of Greece. His earliest poem
      which has come down to us (the 10th Pythian) he composed at the age of twenty. It is an
      Epinican ode in honour of Hippocles, a Thessalian youth belonging to the powerful Aleuad
      family, who had gained the prize at the Pythian games. Supposing Pindar to have been born in
       <date when-custom="-522">B. C. 522</date>, this ode was composed in <date when-custom="-502">B. C.
       502</date>. The next ode of Pindar in point of time is the 6th Pythian, which he wrote in his
      twenty-seventh year, <date when-custom="-494">B. C. 494</date>, in honour of Xenocrates of
      Agrigentum, who had gained the prize at the chariotrace at the Pythian games, by means of his
      son Thrasybulus. It would be tedious to relate at length the different occasions on which he
      composed his other odes. It may suffice to mention that he composed poems for Hieron, tyrant
      of Syracuse, Alexander, son of Amyntas, king of Macedonia, Theron, tyrant of Agrigentum,
      Arcesilaus, king of Cyrene, as well as for many other free states and private persons. He was
      courted especially by Alexander, king of Macedonia, and Hieron, tyrant of Syracuse ; and the
      praises which he bestowed upon the former are said to have been the chief reason which led his
      descendant, Alexander, the son of Philip, to spare the house of the poet, when he destroyed
      the rest of Thebes (Dion Chrysost. <hi rend="ital">Oral. de Regno,</hi> ii. p. 25). About
       <date when-custom="-473">B. C. 473</date>, Pindar visited the court of Hieron, in consequence of
      the pressing invitation of the monarch; but it appears that he did not remain more than four
      years at Syracuse, as he loved an independent life, and did not care to cultivate the courtly
      arts which rendered his contemporary, Simonides, a more welcome guest at the table of their
      patron. But the estimation in which Pindar was held by his contemporaries is still more
      strikingly shown by the honours conferred upon him by the free states of Greece. Although a
      Theban, he was always a great favourite with the Athenians, whom he frequently praised in his
      poems, and whose city he often visited. In one of his dithyrambs (<hi rend="ital">Dithyr.</hi>
      fr. 4) he called it "the support (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἕρεισμα</foreign>) of Greece,
      glorious Athens, the divine city." The Athenians testified their gratitude by making him their
      public guest (<foreign xml:lang="grc">πρόζενος</foreign>), and giving to him ten thousand
      drachmas (Isocr. <foreign xml:lang="grc">περὶ ἀντιδ.</foreign> p. 304, ed. Dind.); and at
      a later period they erected a statue to his honour (<bibl n="Paus. 1.8.4">Paus. 1.8.4</bibl>),
      but this was not done in his lifetime, as the pseudo-Aeschines states (<hi rend="ital">Epist.</hi> 4). The inhabitants of Ceos employed Pindar to compose for them a <foreign xml:lang="grc">προσόδιον</foreign> or processional song. although they had two celebrated
      poets of their own, Bacchylides and <pb n="369"/> Simonides. The Rhodians had his seventh
      Olympian ode written in letters of gold in the temple of the Lindian Athena.</p><p>Pindar's stated residence was at Thebes (<foreign xml:lang="grc">τᾶς ἐρατεινὸν ὕδωρ
       πίομαι</foreign>, Ol. 6.85), though he frequently left home in order to witness the great
      public games, and to visit the states and distinguished men who courted his friendship and
      employed his services. In the public events of the time he appears to have taken no share.
      Polybius (<bibl n="Plb. 4.31.5">4.31.5</bibl>) quotes some lines of Pindar to prove that the
      poet recommended his countrymen to remain quiet and abstain from uniting with the other Greeks
      in opposition to the Persians; but there can be little doubt that Pindar in these lines
      exhorts his fellow-citizens to maintain peace and concord, and to abstain from the internal
      dissensions which threatened to ruin the city. It is true that he did not make the unavailing
      effort to win over his fellow-citizens to the cause of Greek independence ; but his heart was
      with the free party, and after the conclusion of the war he openly expressed his admiration
      for the victors. Indeed the praises which he bestowed upon Athens, the ancient rival of
      Thebes, displeased his fellow-citizens, who are said even to have fined him in consequence. It
      is further stated that the Athenians paid the fine (Eustath. <hi rend="ital">Vit. Pind. ;</hi>
      Pseudo-Aeschin. <hi rend="ital">Ep.</hi> 4) ; but the tale does not deserve much credit.</p><div><head>Works</head><p>The poems of Pindar show that he was penetrated with a strong religious feeling. He had not
       imbibed any of the scepticism which began to take root at Athens after the close of the
       Persian war. The old myths were for the most part realities to him, and he accepted them with
       implicit credence, except when they exhibited the gods in a point of view which was repugnant
       to his moral feelings. For, in consequence of the strong ethical sense which Pindar
       possessed, he was unwilling to believe the myths which represented the gods and heroes as
       guilty of immoral acts; and he accordingly frequently rejects some tales and changes others,
       because they are inconsistent with his conceptions of the gods (comp. Grote, <hi rend="ital">Hist. of Greece,</hi> vol. i. p. 507, &amp;c.). Pindar was a strict observer of the worship
       of the gods. He dedicated a shrine to the mother of the gods near his own house at Thebes
        (<bibl n="Paus. 9.25.3">Paus. 9.25.3</bibl>; Philostr. Sen. <hi rend="ital">Imag.</hi> 2.12;
       comp. <bibl n="Pind. P. 3.77">Pind. P. 3.77</bibl>). He also dedicated to Zeus Ammon, in
       Libya, a statue made by Calamis (<bibl n="Paus. 9.16.1">Paus. 9.16.1</bibl>), and likewise a
       statue in Thebes to Hermes of the Agora (<bibl n="Paus. 9.17.1">Paus. 9.17.1</bibl>). He was
       in the habit of frequently visiting Delphi ; and there seated on an iron chair, which was
       reserved for him, he used to sing hymns in honour of Apollo. (<bibl n="Paus. 10.24.4">Paus.
        10.24.4</bibl>.)</p><p>The only poems of Pindar which have come down to us entire are his <title>Epinicia</title>,
       or <term>triumphal odes.</term> But these were only a small portion of his works. Besides his
       triumphal odes he wrote hymns to the gods, paeans, dithyrambs, odes for processions (<foreign xml:lang="grc">προσόδια</foreign>), songs of maidens (<foreign xml:lang="grc">παρθένεια</foreign>), mimic dancing songs (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ὑπορχήματα</foreign>), drinking-songs (<foreign xml:lang="grc">σκολιά</foreign>),
       dirges (<foreign xml:lang="grc">θρῆνοι</foreign>), and encomia (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐγκώμια</foreign>), or panegyrics on princes. Of these we have numerous fragments. Most
       of them are mentioned in the well-known lines of Horace (<bibl n="Hor. Carm. 4.2">Hor. Carm.
        4.2</bibl>) : <quote xml:lang="la" rend="blockquote"><l>Sen per audaces nova dithyrambos</l><l>Verba devolvit numerisque fertur</l><l>Lege solutis :</l><l>Seu deos (<gloss xml:lang="en">hymns and paeans</gloss>) regesve (<gloss xml:lang="la">encomia</gloss>) canit, deorum</l><l>Sanguinem : --</l><l>Sive quos Elea domum reducit</l><l>Palma caelestes (<gloss xml:lang="en">the Epinicia</gloss>) :--</l><l>Flebili sponsae juvenemve raptum</l><l>Plorat (<gloss xml:lang="la">the diryes</gloss>).</l></quote></p><p>In all of these varieties Pindar equally excelled, as we see from the numerous quotations
       made from them by the ancient writers, though they are generally of too fragmentary a kind to
       allow us to form a judgment respecting them. Our estimate of Pindar as a poet must be formed
       almost exclusively from his <title xml:lang="la">Epinicia,</title> which were all composed in
       commemoration of some victory in the public games, with the exception of the eleventh Nemean,
       which was written for the installation of Aristagoras in the office of Prytanis at Tenedos.
       The <title>Epinicia</title> are divided into four books, celebrating respectively the
       victories gained in the Olympian, Pythian, Nemean, and Isthmian games. In order to understand
       them properly we must bear in mind the nature of the occasion for which they were composed,
       and the object which the poet had in view. A victory gained in one of the four great national
       festivals conferred honour not only upon the conqueror and his family, but also upon the city
       to which he belonged. It was accordingly celebrated with great pomp and ceremony. Such a
       celebration began with a procession to a temple, where a sacrifice was offered, and it ended
       with a banquet and the joyous revelry, called by the Greeks <foreign xml:lang="grc">κῶμος</foreign>. For this celebration a poem was expressly composed, which was sung by a
       chorus, trained for the purpose, either by the poet himself, or some one acting on his
       behalf. The poems were sung either during the procession to the temple or at the comus at the
       close of the banquet. Those of Pindar's Epinician odes which consist of strophes without
       epodes were sung during the procession, but the majority of them appear to have been sung at
       the comus. For this reason they partake to some extent of the joyous nature of the occasion,
       and accordingly contain at times jocularities which are hardly in accordance with the modern
       notions of lyric poetry. In these odes Pindar rarely describes the victory itself, as the
       scene was familiar to all the spectators, but he dwells upon the glory of the victor, and
       celebrates chiefly either his wealth (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ὄλβος</foreign>) or his
       skill (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀρετή</foreign>),--his <hi rend="ital">wealth,</hi> if he
       had gained the victory in the chariot-race, since it was only the wealthy that could contend
       for the prize in this contest; his <hi rend="ital">skill,</hi> if he had been exposed to
       peril in the contest. He frequently celebrates also the piety and goodness of the victor ;
       for with the deep religious feeling, which preeminently characterizes Pindar, he believed
       that the moral and religious character of the conqueror conciliated the favour of the gods,
       and gained for him their support and assistance in the contest. For the same reason he dwells
       at great length upon the mythical origin of the person whose victory he extols, and connects
       his exploits with the similar exploits of the heroic ancestors of the race or nation to which
       he belongs. These mythical narratives occupy a very prominent feature in almost all of
       Pindar's odes; they are not introduced for the sake of ornament, but have a close and
       intimate connection with the whole object and purpose of each poem, as is clearly pointed out
       by <pb n="370"/> Dissen, in his admirable essay, "De Ratione Poetica Carminum Pindaricorum,
       &amp;c." prefixed to his edition of Pindar, an essay which deserves, and will well repay the
       attentive perusal of the student. The metres of Pindar are too extensive and difficult a
       subject to admit of explanation in the present work. No two odes possess the same metrical
       structure. The Doric rhythm chiefly prevails, but he also makes frequent use of the Aeolian
       and Lydian as well.</p></div><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>The Editio Princeps of Pindar was printed at the Aldine press at Venice in 1513,
        8vo., without the Scholia, but the same volume contained likewise the poems of Callimachus,
        Dionysius, and Lycophron.</bibl><bibl>The second edition was published at Rome by Zacharias Calliergi, with the Scholia, in
        1515, 4to.</bibl> These two editions, which were taken from different families of
       manuscripts, are still of considerable value for the formation of the text. The other
       editions of Pindar published in the course of the sixteenth century were little more than
       reprints of the two above named, and therefore require no further notice here.</p><p><bibl>The first edition, containing a new recension of the text, with explanatory notes, a
        Latin version, &amp;c. was that published by Erasmus Schmidius, Vitembergae, 1616,
        4to.</bibl><bibl>Next appeared the edition of Joannes Benedictus, Salmurii, 1620, 4to.</bibl>, <bibl>and
        then the one published at Oxford, 1697, fol.</bibl> From this time Pindar appears to have
       been little studied, till <bibl>Heyne published his celebrated edition of the poet at
        Göttingen in 1773, 4to.</bibl>
       <bibl>A second and much improved edition was published at Göttingen in 1798-1799, 3
        vols. 8vo., containing a valuable treatise on the metres of Pindar by Godofred
        Hermann.</bibl>
       <bibl>Heyne's third edition was published after his death by G. H. Schafer, Leipzig, 1817, 3
        vols. 8vo.</bibl>
       <bibl>But the best edition of Pindar is that by A. Böckh, Leipzig, 1811-1821, 2 vols.
        4to.</bibl>, which contains a most valuable commentary and dissertations, and is
       indispensable to the student who wishes to obtain a thorough insight into the musical system
       of the Greeks, and the artistic construction of their lyric poetry. The commentary on the
       Nemean and Isthmian odes in this edition was written by Dissen. <bibl>Dissen also published
        in the Bibliotheca Graeca a smaller edition of the poet, Gotha, 1830, 2 vols. 8vo., taken
        from the text of Böckh, with a most valuable explanatory commentary.</bibl> This
       edition is the most useful to the student from its size, though it does not supersede that of
       Böckh. <bibl>A second edition of Dissen's is now in course of publication under the care
        of Schneidewin : the first volume has already appeared, Gotha, 1843.</bibl>
       <bibl>There is also a valuable edition of Pindar by Fr. Thiersch, Leipzig, 1820, 2 vols.
        8vo., with a German translation, and an important introduction.</bibl>
       <bibl>The text of the poet is given with great accuracy by Th. Bergk in his <title xml:lang="la">Poetae Lyrici Graeci,</title> Leipzig, 1843</bibl>.</p></div><div><head>Translations</head><p>The translations of Pindar into English are not numerous. <bibl>The most recent is by the
        Rev. H. F. Cary, London, 1833</bibl>, which is superior to the older translations <bibl>by
        West</bibl> and <bibl>Moore</bibl>.</p></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>The histories of Greek literature by Müller, Bernhardy, Bode, and Ulrici; J. G.
       Schneider, <hi rend="ital">Versuch über Pindar's Leben und Schriften,</hi> Strasburg,
       1774, 8vo; Mommsen, <hi rend="ital">Pindaros. Zur Geschichte des Dichters,</hi>&amp;c., Kiel,
       1845, 8vo; Schneidewin's <hi rend="ital">Life of Pindar,</hi> prefixed to the second edition
       of Dissen's Pindar.</p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>