<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.photius_15</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.photius_15</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="P"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="photius-bio-15" n="photius_15"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Photius</surname></persName></head><p>4. Of <hi rend="smallcaps">TYRE.</hi> On the deposition of Irenaeus, bishop of Tyre, in
       <date when-custom="448">A. D. 448</date>, Photins was appointed his successor. Evagrius (<hi rend="ital">H. E.</hi> 1.10) makes the deposition of Irenaeus one of the acts of the
      notorious Council of Ephesus, held in A. D. 449, and known as the "Concilium Latrocinale :"
      but Tillemont more correctly considers that the council only confirmed the previous
      deposition. (<hi rend="ital">Mémoires,</hi> vol. xv. p. 268.) Photius of Tyre was one
      of the judges appointed by the emperor Theodosius II., in conjunction with Eustathius, bishop
      of Berytus and Uranius, bishop of Himerae in Osrhoiene, to hear the charges against Ibas,
      bishop of Edessa. Photius, Eustathius, and Uranius, met at Berytus, and Photius and Eustathius
      again met at Tyre, in the year 448 or 449, heard the charges, acquitted Ibas, and brought
      about a reconciliation between him and his accusers, who were presbyters of his own church at
      Edessa. (<hi rend="ital">Concil.</hi> vol. iv. col. 627, &amp;c., ed. Labbe, vol. ii. col.
      503, &amp;c., ed. IIardouin.) There is a considerable difficulty as <pb n="356"/> to the
      chronology of these meetings, which is discussed by Tillemont in two of his careful notes.
       (<hi rend="ital">Mém.</hi> vol. xv. p. 897, &amp;c.) Photius was present at the
      Council of Ephesus, known as the "Concilium latrocinale," where he joined in acquitting the
      archimandrite Eutyches, and restoring him to his ecclesiastical rank from which he had been
      deposed. (<hi rend="ital">Concil.</hi> vol. iv. col. 260, ed. Labbe, vol. ii. col. 220, ed.
      Hardouin.) About the same time Photius had a contest with Eustathius, bishop of Berytus, who
      had obtained an edict of the emperor Theodosius II., erecting Berytus into a metropolitan see,
      as to the extent of their respective jurisdictions. Tillemont judges that the dignity accorded
      to the see of Berytus, was designed to be merely titular, and that the struggle was occasioned
      by the attempt of Eustathius to assume metropolitan jurisdiction over some bishoprics
      previously under the jurisdiction of Tyre. In this attempt, being supported by the patriarchs,
      Anatolius of Constantinople, and Maximus of Antioch, he effected his purpose : and Photius,
      after a struggle, was constrained, not so much by an excommunication which was speedily
      recalled, as by a threat of deposition, to submit. The jurisdiction of the dioceses abstracted
      was, however, restored to Photius by the Council of Chalcedon, <date when-custom="451">A. D.
       451</date>. (<hi rend="ital">Concil.</hi> vol. iv. col. 539, ed. Labbe, vol. ii. col. 435,
      &amp;c., ed. Hardouin.) Photius was among those who at the same council voted that Theodoret
      was orthodox, and should be restored to his see. (<hi rend="ital">Concil.</hi> col. 619, ed.
      Labbe, col. 495, ed. Hardouin.) He also took part in some of the other transactions of the
      assembly. Nothing further is known of him. There is extant one piece of Photius, entitled
       <title xml:lang="grc">Δεήσεις</title>, <hi rend="ital">Preces s. Supplex Libellus,</hi>
      addressed to the emperors Valentinian III. and Marcian, respecting the dispute with Eustathius
      of Berytus. It is given in the <title>Actio Quarta</title> of the Council of Chalcedon. (<hi rend="ital">Concilia,</hi> vol. iv. col. 542, &amp;c., ed. Labbe, vol. ii. col. 436, &amp;c.
      ed. Hardouin.)</p><p>A <hi rend="ital">Synopsis de Conciliis,</hi> extant in MS., is ascribed to Photius of Tyre
      : this cannot be, as some have supposed, the same work as the <title>Epitome Actorum
       Conciliorum,</title> also extant in MS., and ascribed to the more celebrated Photius,
      patriarch of Constantinople. (Tillemont, <hi rend="ital">Mém. II. cc. ;</hi> Cave, <hi rend="ital">Hist. Litt.</hi> ad ann. 451, vol. i. p. 443 ; Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Biblioth.
       Graec.</hi> vol. x. p. 678, vol. xii. p. 358.) </p><byline>[<ref target="author.J.C.M">J.C.M</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>