<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.philostorgius_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.philostorgius_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="P"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philostorgius-bio-1" n="philostorgius_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philosto'rgius</surname></persName></head><p>(<persName xml:lang="grc"><surname full="yes">Φιλοστόργιος</surname></persName>), an ecclesiastical
      historian.</p><p>He was a native of Borissus in Cappadocia, the son of Carterius and Eulampia. He was born in
      the reign of Valentinian and Valens in <date when-custom="358">A. D. 358</date>, according to
      Gothofredus (<hi rend="ital">Proleg. ad Philost.</hi> p. 5, &amp;c.), about <date when-custom="367">A. D. 367</date>, according to Vossius (<hi rend="ital">de Hist. Gr.</hi> p. 314). He was 20
      years old when Eunomius was expelled from Caesareia [<hi rend="smallcaps">EUNOMIUS</hi>]. Like
      his father Carterius, he warmly embraced the doctrines of Eunomius.</p><div><head>Works</head><div><head>Ecclesiastical History</head><p>He wrote an ecclesiastical history, from the heresy of Arius in <date when-custom="300">A. D.
         300</date>, down to the period when Theodosius the Younger conferred the empire of the West
        on Valentinian the Younger (<date when-custom="425">A. D. 425</date>). The work was composed in
        twelve books, which began respectively with the twelve letters of his name, so as to form a
        sort of acrostic. In this history he lost no opportunity of extolling the Arians and
        Eunomians, while he overwhelmed the orthodox party with abuse, with the single exception of
        Gregorius of Nazianzus. Photius charges him with introducing gross misrepresentations and
        unfounded statements, and says that his work is not a history, but a panegyric upon the
        heretics. Philostorgius nevertheless was a man of learning, and was possessed of
        considerable geographical and astronomical knowledge.</p><p>Being a heretic, it is not to be wondered at that his work has not come down to us. An
        abstract of it, however, was made by Photius in a separate work, which has been preserved.
        Photius characterises him as being elegant in his style, making use of figurative
        expressions, pressions, though not in excess. His figures were, however, sometimes harsh and
        far-fetched, and his narrative involved and indistinct. (Phot. <hi rend="ital">Bibl.</hi>
        cod. xl.)</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>The abstract of Photius was published at Geneva in 1643 by Jac. Godefroi, or
          Gothofredus</bibl>, and <bibl>in a somewhat corrected form, with a new Latin translation
          by H. Valesius (Paris, 1673), together with the ecclesiastical history of Theodoritus,
          Evagrius and Theodorus</bibl>; <bibl>also by Reading, <hi rend="ital">Cantabr.</hi>
          1720.</bibl></p></div></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Gr.</hi> vii. p. 420, &amp;c.; Voss. <hi rend="ital">de Hist.
        Gr.</hi> p. 313, &amp;c.; Schöoll, <hi rend="ital">Gesch. der Griech. Lit.</hi> vol.
       iii. p. 313. </p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.C.P.M">C.P.M</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>