<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.philocrates_2</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.philocrates_2</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="P"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philocrates-bio-2" n="philocrates_2"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philo'crates</surname></persName></head><p>2. An Athenian, son of Ephialtes, was sent in <date when-custom="-390">B. C. 390</date> with ten
      triremes to Cyprus, to the aid of Evagoras, though the latter had revolted from the king of
      Persia (Artaxerxes II.), who was an ally of the Athenians at the time. On his voyage,
      Philocrates fell in with Teleutias, the Lacedaemonian, who was sailing to Rhodes with 27
      ships, and who, notwithstanding the enmity between Sparta and Persia, attacked and captured
      the whole Athenian squadron (<bibl n="Xen. Hell. 4.8.24">Xen. Hell. 4.8.24</bibl>; comp. Lys.
       <hi rend="ital">pro Bon. Arist.</hi> pp. 153-155; <bibl n="Diod. 14.97">Diod. 14.97</bibl>,
       <bibl n="Diod. 14.98">98</bibl>.) In a passage of Demosthenes (<hi rend="ital">c.
       Aristocr.</hi> p. 659) we are told that on one occasion, when the Lacedaemonians, with solemn
      assurances of good faith, had offered to give any pledge for it which might be required,
      Philocrates answered that no pledge could be satisfactory to him except a proof of their not
      being <hi rend="ital">able</hi> to do injury. In this passage, however, the name of Iphicrates
      occurs as a various reading. The person of whom we have been speaking was perhaps the same
      Philocrates, who, after the execution of Ergocles for treason and peculation, was accused, in
      the speech of Lysias, yet extant, of being in possession of the confiscated property of the
      traitor, whose intimate friend he had been, and who during his command had made him his
      trierarch and receiver of his money. (<hi rend="ital">Lys. c. Erg., c. Phil.</hi> pp. 179-182;
      Schn. ad Xen. <hi rend="ital">Hell. l.e.</hi>) <hi rend="smallcaps">[<ref target="thrasybulus-bio-1">THRASYBULUS</ref>.]</hi> The name Philocrates in <bibl n="Xen. Hell. 4.4.9">Xen. Hell. 4.4.9</bibl>, seems clearly to be an error for Iphicrates.
      (Schn. <hi rend="ital">ad loc. ;</hi> comp. <bibl n="Diod. 14.86">Diod. 14.86</bibl>; <bibl n="Polyaen. 1.9">Polyaen. 1.9</bibl>.)</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>