<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.philippus_31</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.philippus_31</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="P"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-31" n="philippus_31"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname></persName></head><p>(<persName xml:lang="grc"><surname full="yes">Φίλιππος</surname></persName>), literary and
      ecclesiastical.</p><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-31a"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname></persName></head><p>1. <hi rend="smallcaps">ABUCARA</hi> or <hi rend="smallcaps">ABUVARA</hi>.</p><div><head>Work</head><div><head>on the <title>Enchiridion</title> of the Greek grammarian, Hephaestion of
         Alexandria</head><p>He was one of the Greek scholiasts on the <title>Enchiridion</title> of the Greek
         grammarian, Hephaestion of Alexandria [<hi rend="smallcaps">HEPHAESTION</hi>, No. 1], or
         perhaps the compiler of the <hi rend="ital">Scholia</hi>.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p>These are <bibl>usually published in the various editions of Hephaestion.</bibl> The <hi rend="ital">Scholia</hi> are ascribed to our Philip in a MS. in the King's Library at
          Paris.</p></div></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p><hi rend="ital">Catal. 1MStorum Biblioth. Regiae,</hi> No. nmmdclxxiv. No. 1. vol. ii. p.
        539, fol. Paris, 1740; Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Graec.</hi> vol. xi. p. 709; Vossius,
         <hi rend="ital">De Hist. Graec.</hi> lib. iii.</p></div></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-32" n="philippus_32"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname></persName></head><p>2. Of <hi rend="smallcaps">AMPHIPOLIS</hi>, a Greek writer of unknown date, remarkable for
       his obscenity, of which Suidas (<hi rend="ital">s. v.</hi>
       <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀποσιμῶσαι</foreign>) has given a sufficiently significant
       specimen. He wrote, according to Suidas (<hi rend="ital">s. r.</hi>
       <foreign xml:lang="grc">Φίλιππος</foreign>) :--1. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ρ̓οδιακὰ
        βιβλία</foreign> iq, <hi rend="ital">Rhodiaca Libris XIX.,</hi> a history of Rhodes, which
       Suidas especially stigmatizes for the obscenity of its matter. 2. <foreign xml:lang="grc">κωανὰ</foreign> (<hi rend="ital">s.</hi>
       <foreign xml:lang="grc">Κωιακἂ, βιβλία βʼ</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">Coiaca Libris
        dvolams</hi>, a history of the island of Cos. 3. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Θυσιακά</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">De Sacrificiis,</hi> or more probably <foreign xml:lang="grc">Θασιακά</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">Thasiaca,</hi> a history of Thasos,
       also in two books. He wrote some other works not enumerated by Suidas. Theodorus Priscianus,
       an ancient medical writer (<hi rend="ital">Logicus,</hi> 100.11), classes Philip of
       Amphipolis with Herodian and lamblichus the Syrian [<hi rend="smallcaps">IAMBLICHUS</hi>, No.
       1], as a pleasant writer of amatory tales, whose works tended to allure the mind to the
       pursuit of pleasure. All his works appear to be lost. (Suidas <hi rend="ital">ll. cc. ;</hi>
       Theodor. Priscian. <hi rend="ital">l.c.</hi>; Fabric. <hi rend="ital">BBL. Graec.</hi> vol.
       viii. pp. 159, 160; Vossius, <hi rend="ital">De Hist. Graec.</hi> lib. iii.)</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-33" n="philippus_33"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname></persName></head><p>3. <hi rend="smallcaps">APOSTOLUS.</hi> [No. 11.]</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-34" n="philippus_34"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname></persName></head><p>4. <hi rend="smallcaps">CAESARIENSIS</hi>
       <hi rend="smallcaps">SYNODI</hi>
       <hi rend="smallcaps">RELATOR.</hi></p><div><head>Works</head><div><head>account of the council of Caesareia</head><p>The account of the council of Caesareia, held <date when-custom="196">A. D. 196</date>, which
         (if indeed it be genuine) was written by Theophilus of Caesareia, who lived about that time
          [<hi rend="smallcaps">THEOPHILUS</hi>], was published by the Jesuit Bucherius, as the work
         of one Philippus; the editor being apparently misled by an error in the MS. used by
         him.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>The Jesuit Bucherius published this work in his notes to the <title>Canon
            Paschalis</title> of Victories of Aquitania, fol. Antwerp, 1634.</bibl></p></div></div></div><pb n="289"/><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Gracec.</hi> vol. vii. p. 107; Cave, <hi rend="ital">Hist.
         Litt.</hi> ad ann. 192, vol. i. p. 87, ed. Oxford, 1740-1743.</p></div></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-35" n="philippus_35"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname></persName></head><p>5. <hi rend="smallcaps">CARICARUM</hi>
       <hi rend="smallcaps">RERUM</hi>
       <hi rend="smallcaps">SCRIPTOR.</hi> [No. 30.]</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-36" n="philippus_36"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname></persName></head><p>6. Of <hi rend="smallcaps">CHALCIS</hi>, a Greek historian mentioned by Plutarch (<hi rend="ital">Alex. Mag. Vita,</hi> 100.46) as one of the writers who regarded the story of
       the visit of the queen of the Amazons to Alexander the Great, as a fable.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-37" n="philippus_37"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname><addName full="yes">CHOLLIDEUS</addName></persName></head><p>7. <hi rend="smallcaps">CHOLLIDEUS</hi>, or <hi rend="smallcaps">CHOLLIDENSIS</hi>
        (<foreign xml:lang="grc">Χολιδεὺς</foreign>, more correctly <foreign xml:lang="grc">Χολλιδεὺς</foreign>), mentioned in Plato's will, given by Diogenes Laertius (3.41), as
       the owner of land adjoining a farm or estate which Plato bequeathed to his son Adeimantius.
       Fabricius (<hi rend="ital">Bibl. Graec.</hi> vol. iii. p. 181) notices this occurrence of the
       name of Philippus: and the compiler of the index to Fabricius has unwittingly converted the
       Attic landowner into a Platonic philosopher.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-38" n="philippus_38"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname></persName></head><p>8. <hi rend="smallcaps">COMICUS</hi>, the <hi rend="smallcaps">COMIC</hi>
       <hi rend="smallcaps">WRITER</hi></p><div><head>Works</head><div><head>Comedies</head><p>Scarcely anything is known of him, except it be the title of some of his comedies, and
         even with respect to these there is considerable difficulty. Suidas (<hi rend="ital">s.
          v.</hi>), on the authority of Athenaeus, ascribes to him a comedy entitled <title xml:lang="grc">κωδωνιασταί</title>, but no such title is found in the present text of
         Athenaeus; and it is doubtful if that writer has mentioned Philip at all. His name occurs,
         indeed, in one place (viii. p. 358f.), according to the older editions, but the correct
         reading is Ephippus. Philip is among the comic poets from whom passages are given in the
         several collections of the <title>Poetae Gnomici Graeci ;</title> but only one citation
         appears to be ascribed to him, said by Grotius to be from a comedy entitled <title xml:lang="grc">Ὀλυνθιακός</title>, <hi rend="ital">Olynthiacus ;</hi> but Grotins
         assigns the play not to Philippus, but to Philippides. There is consequently not one known
         drama to which the title of Philip is clear and indisputable. Philip is probably the
          <foreign xml:lang="grc">γελωτοποιὸς Φίλιππος</foreign>, "the laughter-exciting
         Philip" of Maximus Tyrius (<hi rend="ital">Dissert.</hi> xxi. vol. i. p. 402, ed. Reiske),
         and the <foreign xml:lang="grc">Φίλιππος κωμῳδιδάς καλος</foreign> of Themistius (<hi rend="ital">Paraphras. Aristotelis Lib. I. de Anima,</hi> 100.3, sub fin. p. 68b. ed.
         Aldus, Venice, 1533, or 100.19, in the Latin version of Hermolaus Barbarus), who cites a
         saying of Daedalus, one of his characters.</p></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Suidas, <hi rend="ital">l.c.</hi> c.; Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Graec.</hi> vol. i.
        pp. 728, 743, 747, 748, vol. ii. p. 480.</p></div></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-39" n="philippus_39"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><forename full="yes">Philippus</forename><surname full="yes">Diaconus</surname></persName></label></head><p>9. <hi rend="smallcaps">DIACONUS</hi>, the <hi rend="smallcaps">DEACON.</hi> [No. 11.]</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-40" n="philippus_40"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname></persName></head><p>10. <hi rend="smallcaps">EPIGRAMMATICUS.</hi></p><div><head>Confusion among various epigrammatists named Philip</head><p>Among the writers whose <title xml:lang="la">Epigrammata</title> are inserted in the
        various editions of the <title>Anthologia Graeca,</title> or in other works, are several who
        bear the name of Philip; as Philip the Macedonian [No. 15], and Philip of Thessalonica [see
        below].</p><p>There are two others: a Philip whom Fabricius styles Junior, and assigns to the fifth or
        sixth century after Christ.</p></div><div><head>Works</head><div><head><title xml:lang="la">Epigramma in Amores sibi arridentes
         Constantinopoli</title></head><p>There is extant an <title xml:lang="la">Epigramma in Amores sibi arridentes
          Constantinopoli,</title> which is assigned to Philip of Thessalonica.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>Among his epigrams it is No. lvii., in the editions of Brunck, vol. ii. p.
           227</bibl>, and <bibl>Jacobs, vol. ii. p. 211.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head><title xml:lang="la">Epigramma in Herculem</title></head><p>There is a Philip called Byzantinus who composed an <title xml:lang="la">Epigramma in
          Herculem</title>.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>This is given in the <title>Mythologiae</title> of Natalis Comes, lib. vii. pp.
           691, 692, ed. sine loci not. 1653</bibl>, and <bibl>assigned to Philip of Thessalonica
           (No. li.) in the <title>Anthologia</title> of Brunck, vol. ii. pp. 225, 226</bibl>, and
           <bibl>Jacobs, vol. ii. p. 209.</bibl></p></div></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Graec.</hi> vol. iv. p. 491.</p></div></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-41" n="philippus_41"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname></persName></head><p>11. <hi rend="smallcaps">EVANGELISTA</hi>, the <hi rend="smallcaps">EVANGELIST.</hi></p><div><head>Works</head><div><head>Gospel</head><p>Among the spurious gospels which were produced in the early ages of the Church, was one
         to which some of the Gnostic sects appealed (Epiphan. <hi rend="ital">Haeres.</hi> 26.13),
         and which they ascribed to Philip, whether to the Apostle Philip or the deacon Philip, who
         in one passage in the New Testament (<hi rend="ital">Acts,</hi> 21.8) is called the
         Evangelist, is not clear. A passage from this apocryphal gospel is cited by Epiphanius
         (ibid.) Timotheus, the presbyter of Constantinople (apud Meursium, <hi rend="ital">Varia
          Divina,</hi> p. 117), and Leontius of Byzantium (<hi rend="ital">De Sectis,</hi> act. s.
         lect. iii.) mention <foreign xml:lang="grc">Τὸ κατὰ Φίλιππον
         Εὐαγγέλιον</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">Evangelium secundnum Philippum,</hi> as among the
         spurious books used by the Manichaeans. Whether this was the same book with that used by
         the Gnostics, is not determined.</p></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Cod. Apocryph. N. T.</hi> vol. i. p. 376, &amp;c.</p></div></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-42" n="philippus_42"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname></persName></head><p>12. Of <hi rend="smallcaps">GORTYNA</hi>, a Christian writer of the second century. He was
       bishop of the Church at Gortyna in Crete, and was spoken of in the highest terms by Dionysius
       of Corinth [<hi rend="smallcaps">DIONYSIUS</hi>, literary, No. 22], in a letter to the Church
       at Gortyna and the other Churches in Crete (apud <bibl n="Euseb. Hist. Eccl. 4.23">Euseb.
        Hist. Eccl. 4.23</bibl>), as having inspired his flock with manly courage, apparently during
       the persecution of Marcus Aurelius.</p><div><head>Works</head><div><head>Against Marcion</head><p>Philip wrote a book against Marcion [<hi rend="smallcaps">MARCION</hi>], which was highly
         esteemed by the ancients, but is now lost: Trithemius speaks of it as extant in his day,
         but his exactness as to whether books were in existence or not is not great. He also states
         that Philip wrote <hi rend="ital">Ad Diversos Epistolae</hi> and <hi rend="ital">Varii
          Tractatus,</hi> but these are not mentioned by the ancients.</p></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p><bibl n="Euseb. Hist. Eccl. 4.21">Euseb. Hist. Eccl. 4.21</bibl>, <bibl n="Euseb. Hist. Eccl. 4.23">23</bibl>, <bibl n="Euseb. Hist. Eccl. 4.25">25</bibl>; Hieron.
         <hi rend="ital">De Viris Illustr.</hi> c. 30; Trithem. <hi rend="ital">De Scriptorib.
         Eccles.</hi> 100.19; Cave, <hi rend="ital">Hist. Litt.</hi> ad ann. 172, vol. i. p. 74, ed.
        Oxford, 1740-1743.</p></div></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-43" n="philippus_43"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname><addName full="yes">GRAMMATICUS</addName></persName></head><p>13. <hi rend="smallcaps">GRAMMATICUS</hi>
       <hi rend="smallcaps">S.</hi>
       <hi rend="smallcaps">RHETOR S.</hi>
       <hi rend="smallcaps">SOPHISTA.</hi></p><p>Nothing is known of the works or the writer, who must have lived at a later period than
       Herodian [<hi rend="smallcaps">HERODIANUS</hi>
       <hi rend="smallcaps">AELIUS</hi>], who belongs to the age of the Antonines.</p><div><head>Works</head><div><head>on the aspirates, <foreign xml:lang="grc">Περὶ πνευμάτων</foreign>, <title xml:lang="la">De Spiritibus</title></head><p>Suidas (<hi rend="ital">s. v.</hi> *Fi/lippos sofisth/s) ascribes to this writer a work
         on the aspirates, <foreign xml:lang="grc">Περὶ πνευμάτων</foreign>, <title xml:lang="la">De Spiritibus,</title> taken from Herodian, and arranged in alphabetical
         order.</p></div><div><head><foreign xml:lang="grc">Περὶ πνευμάτων, συναλοιφῆς</foreign>, <title xml:lang="la">De Synaloepha.</title></head><p>Also a work <foreign xml:lang="grc">Περὶ πνευμάτων, συναλοιφῆς</foreign>, <title xml:lang="la">De Synaloepha.</title>
        </p></div></div></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-44" n="philippus_44"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname><addName full="yes">ISANGELUS</addName></persName></head><p>14. <hi rend="smallcaps">ISANGELUS</hi> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ὁ
        εἰσαγγελεύς</foreign>), a writer cited by Plutarch (<hi rend="ital">Alex. Mag. Vita,</hi>
       100.46) as one of those who affirmed that the account of the visit of the queen of the
       Amazons to <ref target="alexander-the-great-bio-1">Alexander</ref> was a fiction. It has been
       conjectured (vide Reiske, <hi rend="ital">Not. ad Plutarch. l.c.</hi>) that <foreign xml:lang="grc">ὁ εἰσαγγελεύς</foreign> is a corrupt reading, and that it should be
        <foreign xml:lang="grc">ὁ Θεαγ γελεύς.</foreign> [No. 30.]</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-45" n="philippus_45"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname><addName full="yes">MACEDO</addName></persName></head><p>15. <hi rend="smallcaps">MACEDO</hi>, the <hi rend="smallcaps">MACEDONIAN.</hi></p><p>Fabricius supposed him to have been a different person from Philip of Thessalonica (see
       below), and to have lived in the reign of Caligula, whose bridge at Puteoli has been thought
       to be referred to. But Jacobs (<hi rend="ital">Animadvers. in loc.</hi>) considers the
       reference to be to the Portus Julius formed by Agrippa in Lake Lucrinus near Baiae, and
       places the <title>Epigramma</title> among those of Philip of Thessalonica.</p><div><head>Works</head><div><head>Epigram</head><p>An <foreign xml:lang="la">Epigramma</foreign> in the <title>Anthologia Graeca</title>
         (lib. 4. c.11, vol. ii. p. 232, ed. Brunck, vol. ii. p. 216, No. lxxiv. ed. Jacobs) is
         ascribed by Fabricius to a Philippus Macedo, Philip the Macedonian.</p></div></div></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-46" n="philippus_46"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname><addName full="yes">MEDMAEUS</addName></persName></head><p>16. <hi rend="smallcaps">MEDMAEUS</hi> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ὁ Μεδμαῖος</foreign>),
       an astronomer of Medama or Medma in Magna Graecia (about 25 miles N. N. E. of Rhegium), and a
       disciple of Plato, under whose direction he turned his attention to the mathematical
       sciences. His observations, which were made in the Peloponnesus and <pb n="290"/> in Locris,
       were used by the astronomers Hipparchus, Geminus the Rhodian, and Ptolemy.</p><p>In the Latin version of Proclus, by Franc. Ba?ocius (lib. 2. c.4), Philip is called
       Mendaeus, which is doubtless an error either of the printer or translator, or perhaps of the
       MS. which he used. Mende was in Macedonia, in the peninsula of Pallene.</p><div><head>Works</head><p>He is mentioned by several ancient writers, as Vitruvius (<hi rend="ital">Architect.</hi>
        9.7, s. ut alii 4), Pliny the elder (<hi rend="ital">H. N.</hi> 18.31. s. 74), Plutarch (<hi rend="ital">Quod non possit suaviter vivi second. Epicur Opera,</hi> vel x. p. 500, ed.
        Reiske), who states that he demonstrated the figure of the moon; Proclus (<hi rend="ital">In
         I. Euclid. Element. Lib. Commentar.</hi>), and Alexander Aphrodisiensis.</p><div><head>Treatise on the Winds</head><p>He is said by Stephanus of Byzantium (<hi rend="ital">De Urbibus s. v. Medme</hi>) to
         have written a treatise on the winds.</p></div><div><head>Treatise on the mathematical passages in Plato</head><p>Fabricius also states that "Philippus Mendaeus extracted and explained all the
         mathematical passages which he had noticed in the works of his instructor Plato ;" but he
         does not give his authority for the statement. Mendaeus is here, too, an evident error for
         Medmaeus.</p></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Graec.</hi> vol. iv. p. 10, vol. vi. p. 243.</p></div></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-47" n="philippus_47"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname><addName full="yes">MEGARICUS</addName></persName></head><p>17. <hi rend="smallcaps">MEGARICUS</hi> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ὁ
       Μεγαρικός</foreign>), <hi rend="ital">i. e.</hi> the <hi rend="smallcaps">MEGARIC</hi>
       <hi rend="smallcaps">PHILOSOPHER</hi> [comp. <hi rend="smallcaps">EUCLEIDES</hi> of <hi rend="smallcaps">MEGARA</hi>].</p><div><head>Works</head><p>Diogenes Laertius (2.113) has given an extract from a work of this Philip, containing some
        account of Stilpo of Megara [<hi rend="smallcaps">STILPO</hi>], who lived during the
        struggles of the successors of Alexander the Great.</p></div></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-48" n="philippus_48"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname><addName full="yes">MENDAEUS.</addName></persName></head><p>18. <hi rend="smallcaps">MENDAEUS.</hi> [No. 16.]</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-49" n="philippus_49"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname></persName></head><p>19. Of <hi rend="smallcaps">OPUS.</hi> Suidas (<hi rend="ital">s. v.</hi>
       <foreign xml:lang="grc">Φιλόσοφος</foreign>) has this remarkable passage: "--, a
       philosopher who divided the <title>Leges</title> (s. <hi rend="ital">De Legibus</hi>) of
       Plato into twelve books (for he is said to have added the thirteenth himself), and was a
       hearer of Socrates and of Plato himself; devoting himself to the contemplation of the heavens
        (<foreign xml:lang="grc">σχολάσας τοῖς μετεώ ροις</foreign>). He lived in the days of
       Philip of Macedon." Suidas then gives a long list of works written by Philip. It is evident
       that the passage as it stands in Suidas is imperfect, and that the name of the author of the
       numerous works which he mentions has been lost from the commencement of the passage. It
       appears, however, from the extract occupying its proper place in the Lexicon according to its
       present heading, that the defect existed in the source from which Suidas borrowed. Kuster,
       the editor of Suidas (<hi rend="ital">not. in loc.</hi>), after long investigation, was
       enabled to supply the omission by comparing a passage in Diogenes Laertius (3.37), and to
       identify "the philosopher" of Suidas with Philip of the Locrian town of Opus, near the
       channel which separates Euboea from the main land. The passage in Laertius is as follows:
       "Some say that Philip the Opuntian transcribed his (Plato's) work, <hi rend="ital">De
        Legibus,</hi> which was written in wax (<hi rend="ital">i. e.</hi> on wooden tablets covered
       with a coat of wax). They say also that the <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἐπινομις</foreign>,
        <title xml:lang="la">Epinomis</title> (the thirteenth book of the <title>De Legibus</title>)
       is his," <hi rend="ital">i. e.</hi> Philip's. The <title xml:lang="la">Epinomis</title>,
       whether written by Philip or by Plato, is usually included amon, the works of the latter.
        [<hi rend="smallcaps">PLATO.</hi>] Diogenes Laertius elsewhere (3.46) enumerates Philip
       among the disciples of Plato. (Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Graec.</hi> vol. iii. p.
       104.)</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-50" n="philippus_50"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname></persName></head><p>20. <hi rend="smallcaps">ORI</hi>
       <hi rend="smallcaps">APOLLINIS</hi>
       <hi rend="smallcaps">INTERPRES</hi></p><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Voss. <hi rend="ital">De Historicis Graecis,</hi> lib. iii.. [<hi rend="smallcaps">HORAPOLLO.</hi>]</p></div></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-51" n="philippus_51"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname><addName full="yes">PARODUS</addName></persName></head><p>21. <hi rend="smallcaps">PARODUS</hi>, the <hi rend="smallcaps">PARODIST.</hi></p><div><head>Works</head><div><head>Parodies</head><p>In a fragment of the Parodist. Matron [<ref target="matron-bio-1">MATRON</ref>]. quoted
         by Athenaeus, in which apparently there is an enumeration of Parodists who had lived long
         before Matron, two or more writers of the name of Philip are mentioned, with the laudatory
         epithet "eminent" (<foreign xml:lang="grc">δῖοί τε Φίλιπποι</foreign>, "nobiles
         Philippi") ; but of their country, works, or age, except that they lived long before
          (<foreign xml:lang="grc">πάρος</foreign>, "olim") Matron himself, who cannot be placed
         later than the time of Philip king of Macedon, nothing is known.</p></div></div></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-52" n="philippus_52"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname><addName full="yes">PRESBYTER.</addName></persName></head><p>22. <hi rend="smallcaps">PRESBYTER.</hi></p><p>Gennadius (<hi rend="ital">De Viris Illustrib.</hi> 100.62) states that Philip the
       Presbyter was a disciple of Jerome, and that he died in the reign of Marcian and Avitus over
       the Eastern and Western Empires respectively, <hi rend="ital">i.e.</hi>
       <date when-custom="456">A. D. 456</date>. [<hi rend="smallcaps">AVITUS</hi> ; <hi rend="smallcaps">MARCIANUS.</hi>]</p><div><head>Works</head><p>He wrote, <listBibl><bibl>1. <title xml:lang="la">Commentarius in Jobum </title></bibl><bibl>2. <title xml:lang="la">Familiares Epistolae</title></bibl></listBibl> Of these, Genadius, who had read them, speaks highly. These <title xml:lang="la">Epistolae</title> have perished.</p><div><head><title xml:lang="la">Commentarius in Jobum</title></head><div><head>Editions</head><p>A <title xml:lang="la">Commentarius in Jobum</title> addressed to Nectarius has been
          several times printed, sometimes <bibl>separately under the name of Philip (two editions,
           fol. and 4to. Basel, 1527)</bibl>, and <bibl>sometimes under the name and among the works
           of Venerable Bede and of Jerome.</bibl>
          <bibl>Vallarsius and the Benedictine editors of Jerome give the
            <title>Commentarius</title> in their editions of that father (vol. v. p. 678, &amp;c.
           ed. Benedict., vol. xi. col. 565, &amp;c. ed. Vallars.), but not as his.</bibl>
          <bibl>The <title xml:lang="la">Prologus</title> or <title xml:lang="la">Praefatio ad
            Nectarium</title> are omitted, and the text differs very widely from that given in the
           Cologne edition of Bede (vol. iv. p. 447, &amp;c.) fol. 1612, in which the work is given
           as Bede's, without any intimation of its doubtful authorship.</bibl> Cave, Oudin, and
          Vallarsi agree in ascribing the work to Philip, though Vallarsi is not so decided in his
          opinion as the other two.</p></div></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Gennad. <hi rend="ital">l.c. ;</hi> Cave, <hi rend="ital">Hist. Litt.</hi> ad ann. 440,
        vol. i. p. 434; Oudin, <hi rend="ital">De Scriptorib. Eccles.</hi> vol. i. col. 1165;
        Vallarsi, <hi rend="ital">Opera Hieron.</hi> vol. iii. col. 825, &amp;c., vol. xi. col. 565,
        566; Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Biblioth. Med. et Infim. Latiz.</hi> vol. v. p. 295, ed.
        Mansi.</p></div></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-53" n="philippus_53"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname></persName></head><p>23. Of <hi rend="smallcaps">PRUSA</hi> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ὁ
       Προυσιεύς</foreign>), a stoic philosopher, contemporary with Plutarch, who has introduced
       him as one of the speakers in his <title xml:lang="la">Sympos.</title> (vii. quaest. 7.)</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-54" n="philippus_54"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname><addName full="yes">RHETOR.</addName></persName></head><p>24. <hi rend="smallcaps">RHETOR.</hi> [No. 13.]</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-55" n="philippus_55"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname><addName full="yes">SCRIPTOR</addName></persName></head><p>25. <hi rend="smallcaps">SCRIPTOR</hi>
       <hi rend="smallcaps">DE</hi>
       <hi rend="smallcaps">AGRICULTURA.</hi></p><div><head>Works</head><div><head>On Agriculture</head><p>Athenaeus (iii.) mentions a Philippus, without any distinctive epithet, as the author of
         a work on Agriculture, either entitled <title xml:lang="grc">Γεωργικόν</title>, <hi rend="ital">Georgicum,</hi> or similar to the work of Androtion, another writer on
         agriculture [<hi rend="smallcaps">ANDROTION</hi>], which bore that title. Nothing more is
         known of this Philip.</p></div></div></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-56" n="philippus_56"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname></persName></head><p>26. Of <hi rend="smallcaps">SIDE</hi> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ὁ Σιδίτης</foreign>, or
        <foreign xml:lang="grc">Σιδέτης</foreign>, or <foreign xml:lang="grc">ὁ ἀπὸ
        Σίδης</foreign>), a Christian writer of the first half of the fifth century. His birth
       must be placed in the latter part of the fourth century, but its exact date is not known. He
       was a native of Side in Pamphylia, and according to his own account in the fragment published
       by Dodwell (see below), when Rhodon, who succeeded Didymus in the charge of the Catechetical
       school of Alexandria, transferred that school to Side, Philip became one of his pupils. If we
       suppose Didymus to have retained the charge of the school till his death, <date when-custom="396">A. D. 396</date> [<hi rend="smallcaps">DIDYMUS</hi>, No. 4], at the advanced age of 86, the
       removal of the school cannot have taken place long before the close of the century, and we
       may infer that Philip's birth could scarcely have been earlier than <date when-custom="380">A. D.
        380</date>. He was a kinsman of Troilus of Side, the rhetorician, who was tutor to Socrates
       the ecclesiastical historic, and was indeed <pb n="291"/> so eminent that Philip regarded his
       relationship to him as a subject of exultation (Socrates, <hi rend="ital">H. E.</hi> 7.27).
       Having entered the church, he was ordained deacon, and had much intercourse with Chrysostom;
       in the titles of some MSS. he is styled his Syncellns, or personal attendant, which makes it
       probable that he was, from the early part of his ecclesiastical career, connected with the
       church at Constantinople. Liberatus (<hi rend="ital">Breviar.</hi> 100.7) says he was
       ordained deacon by Chrysostom; but Socrates, when speaking of his intimacy with that eminent
       man, does not say he was ordained by him. Philip devoted himself to literary pursuits, and
       collected a large library. He cultivated the Asiatic or diffuse style of composition, and
       became a voluminous writer. At what period of his life his different works were produced is
       not known. His Ecclesiastical History was, as we shall see, written after his disappointment
       in obtaining the patriarchate : but as his being a candidate for that high office seems to
       imply some previous celebrity, it may be inferred that his work or works in reply to the
       emperor Julian's attacks on Christianity were written at an earlier period. On the death of
       Atticus patriarch of Constantinople <date when-custom="425">A. D. 425</date> [<ref target="atticus-bio-1">ATTICUS</ref>] Philip, then a presbyter, apparently of the great
       church of Constantinople, and Proclus, another presbyter, were proposed, each by his own
       partizans, as candidates for the vacant see; but the whole people were bent upon the election
       of Sisinnius, also a presbyter, though not of Constantinople, but of a church in Elaea, one
       of the suburbs. (Socrates, <hi rend="ital">H. E.</hi> 7.26.) The statement of Socrates as to
       the unanimity of the popular wish leads to the inference that the supporters of Philip and
       Proclus were among the clergy. Sisinnius was the successful candidate; and Philip, mortified
       at his defeat, made in his Ecclesiastical History such severe strictures on the election of
       his more fortunate rival, that Socrates could not venture to transcribe his remarks; and has
       expressed his strong disapproval of his headstrong temper. On the death of Sisinnius (<date when-custom="428">A. D. 428</date>) the supporters of Philip were again desirous of his
       appointment, but the emperor, to prevent disturbances, determined that no ecclesiastic of
       Constantinople should succeed to the vacancy; and the ill-fated heresiarch Nestorius [<hi rend="smallcaps">NESTORIUS</hi>], from Antioch, was consequently chosen. After the
       deposition of Nestorius at the council of Ephesus (<date when-custom="431">A. D. 431</date>),
       Philip was a third time candidate for the patriarchate, but was again unsuccessful. Nothing
       is known of him after this. It has been conjectured that he was dead before the next vacancy
       in the patriarchate <date when-custom="434">A. D. 434</date>, when his old competitor Proclus was
       chosen. Certainly there is no notice that Philip was again a candidate : but the prompt
       decision of the emperor Theodosius in Proclus' favour prevented all competition, so that no
       inference can be drawn from Philip's quiescence.</p><div><head>Works</head><p>Philip wrote,</p><div><head>1. <title xml:lang="la">Multa volumina contra Imperatorem Julianum
         Apostam.</title></head><p>(Liberatus, <hi rend="ital">Breviar.</hi> 100.7; comp. Socrat. <hi rend="ital">H. E.</hi>
         7.27.) It is not clear from the expression of Liberatus, which we have given as the title,
         whether Philip wrote many works, or, as is more likely, one work in many parts, in reply to
         Julian.</p></div><div><head>2. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἱστορία Χριστιανική</foreign>, <title xml:lang="la">Historia Christiana.</title></head><p>The work was very large, consisting of thirty-six <foreign xml:lang="grc">Βίβλοι</foreign> or <foreign xml:lang="grc">Βιβλία</foreign>. <hi rend="ital">Libri,</hi> each subdivided into twenty-four <foreign xml:lang="grc">τόμοι</foreign>
         or <foreign xml:lang="grc">λόγοι</foreign>, i. e. sections. This voluminous work appears
         to have comprehended both sacred and ecclesiastical history, beginning from the Creation,
         and coming down to Philip's own day, as appears by his record of the election of Sisinnius,
         already noticed. It appears to have been finished not very long after that event.
         Theophanes places its completion in <hi rend="smallcaps">A. M.</hi> 5922, Alex. era=<date when-custom="430">A. D. 430</date>; which, according to him, was the year before the death of
         Sisinnius. That the work was completed before the death of Sisinnius is probable from the
         apparent silence of Philip as to his subsequent disappointments in obtaining the
         patriarchate : but as Sisinnius, according to a more exact chronology, died <date when-custom="428">A. D. 428</date>, we may conclude that the work was finished in or before that
         year, and, consequently, that the date assigned by Theophanes is rather too late. The style
         was verbose and wearisome, neither polished nor agreeable; and the matter such as to
         display ostentatiously the knowledge of the writer, rather than to conduce to the
         improvement of the reader. It was, in fact, crammed with matter of every kind, relevant and
         irrelevant : questions of geometry, astronomy. arithmetic and music; descriptions of
         islands, mountains and trees, rendered it cumbersome and unreadable. Chronological
         arrangement was disregarded.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p>The work is lost, with the exception of three fragments. One of these, <title xml:lang="la">De Scholae Catechetice Alexandrinae Successione,</title> on the succession
          of teachers in the Catechetical School of Alexandria, was <bibl>published from a MS. in
           the Bodleian Library at Oxford, by Dodwell, with his <title xml:lang="la">Dissertationes
            in Irenaeum,</title> 8vo Oxford, 1689</bibl>, and has been repeatedly reprinted <bibl>It
           is given in the ninth volume of the <title>Bibliotheca Patrum</title> of Galland, p.
           401.</bibl></p><p><bibl>Another fragment in the same MS., <title xml:lang="la">De Constantino, Maximiano,
            et Licinio Augustis.</title> was prepared for publication by Crusius, but has never, we
           believe, been actually published. The third fragment, <foreign xml:lang="grc">Τὰ
            γενόμενα ἐν Περσίδι μεταξὺ Χριστιανῶν Ἑλλήνων τε καὶ Ἰουδαίων</foreign>
           <title xml:lang="la">Acta Disputationis de Christo, in Perside, inter Christianos,
            Gentiles, et Judaeos habitae,</title> is (or was) in the Imperial Library at Vienna.
           Philip was present at the disputation.</bibl></p></div></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Socrates, <hi rend="ital">H. E.</hi> 7.26, 27, 29, 35; Liberatus, <hi rend="ital">l.c.</hi>; Phot. <hi rend="ital">Bibl.</hi> cod. 35; Theophan. <hi rend="ital">Chronog.</hi> p. 75, ed. Paris, p. 60, ed. Venice, vol. i. p. 135, ed. Bonn; Tillemont.
         <hi rend="ital">Hist. des Empereurs,</hi> vol. vi. p. 130; Cave, <hi rend="ital">Hist.
         Litt.</hi> ad ann. 418, vol. i. p. 395; Oudin. <hi rend="ital">De Scriptorib. Eccles.</hi>
        vol. i. col. 997; Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Graec.</hi> vol. vi. pp. 739, 747, 749, vol.
        vii. p. 418, vol. x. p. 691; Galland, <hi rend="ital">Biblioth. Patrum,</hi> vol. ix. <hi rend="ital">Prol.</hi> 100.11; Lamnbecius, <hi rend="ital">Commentar. de Biblioth. Cae
         saraea,</hi> lib. s. vol. v. col. 289, vol. vi. pars ii. col. 406, ed. Kollar.</p></div></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-57" n="philippus_57"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname><addName full="yes">SOLITARIUS.</addName></persName></head><p>27. <hi rend="smallcaps">SOLITARIUS.</hi> The title Solitarius is given by bibliographers
       to a Greek monk of the time of the emperor Alexius I. Comnenus, of whom nothing further seems
       to be known than what may be gleaned from the titles and introductions of his extant
       works.</p><div><head>Works</head><p>He wrote :--</p><div><head>1. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Διόπτρα</foreign>, Dioptra</head><p>Dioptra, s. <hi rend="ital">Amussis Fideil et Vitae Christianae,</hi> written in the kind
         of measure called "versus politici," <note anchored="true" place="margin">* These "versus politici" are
          thus described by the Jesuit Goar : <quote xml:lang="la">In versibus politicis, numerus
           syllabarum ad cantum non ad exactae poetices prosodiam observatur. Octava syllaba, ubi
           caesura est. medium versus tenet, reliquae septem perficiunt. His recentiores <foreign xml:lang="grc">ὁμοιοτελεῦτα</foreign>, pariter cadentium exitum, quem rhythmum
           (rhyme) dicimus, addidere. Politicos vocatos arbitror quod vulgo Constantinopoli per
           compita canerentur.</quote> Quoted in Lambec. <hi rend="ital">Commentar. de Biblioth.
           Caesar.</hi> vol. s. lib. iv. col. 397, note 2, ed. Kollar. The measure is retained in
          English as a ballad measure, and may be illustrated by the old ditty of "The Unfortunate
          Miss Bayley," the first two lines of which closely resemble in their cadence those cited
          in the text :-- <quote rend="blockquote"><l>A captain bold of Halifax, who lived in
            country quarters,</l><l>Seduced a maid who hung herself one morning in her garters, amp;c.</l></quote></note>
         and in <pb n="292"/> the form of a dialogue between the soul and the body. It is addressed
         to another monk, Callinicus ; and begins with these two lines :-- <quote xml:lang="grc" rend="blockquote">πῶς κάθῃ; πῶς ἀμεριμνεῖς; πῶς ἀμελωῖς, ψυχή μου ; ὁ χρόνος
          σου πεπλήρωται · ἔξελθε τοῦ σαρκίου.</quote></p><p>The work, in its complete state, consisted of five books; but most of the MSS. are
         mutilated or otherwise defective, and want the first book. Some of them have been
         interpolated by a later hand. Michael Psellus, not the older writer of that name, who died
         about <date when-custom="1078">A. D. 1078</date>, but one of later date, wrote a preface and
         notes to the <title>Dioptra</title> of Philip.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p>A Latin prose translation of the <title>Dioptra</title> by the Jesuit Jacobus Pontanus,
          with notes, by another Jesuit, Jacobus Gretserus, was published, 4to. Ingoldstadt, 1604;
          but it was made from a mutilated copy, and consisted of only four books, and these, as the
          translator admits in his <title xml:lang="la">Praefatio ad Lectorem,</title> interpolated
          and transposed ad libitum. Philip wrote also :--</p></div></div><div><head>2. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Τῷ κατὰ πνεῦμα υἱῷ καὶ ἱερεῖ Κωνσταντίνῳ
          περὶ πρεσβείας καὶ προστασίας ἀπόλογους</foreign>, <title xml:lang="la">Epistola
          Apologetica ad Constantianum Filium Spiritualem et Sacerdotem, de Differantia inter
          Intercessionem et Auxilium Sanctorum</title>.</head><p/></div><div><head>3. <title xml:lang="la">Versus Politici</title></head><p>in the beginning of which he states with great exactness the time of his finishing the
          <title>Dioptra,</title> 12th May, A. M. 6603, era Constantinop. in the third indiction, in
         the tenth year of the lunar Cycle=<date when-custom="1095">A. D. 1095</date>, not 1105, as has
         been incorrectly stated.</p></div><div><head>Other works</head><p>Cave has, without sufficient authority, ascribed to our Philip two other works, which are
         indeed given in a Vienna MS. (Codex 213, apud Lambec.) as <hi rend="ital">Appendices</hi>
         to the <hi rend="ital">Dioptra.</hi> One of these works (<hi rend="ital">Appendix
          secunda</hi>), <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ὅτι οὐκ ἔφαγε τὸ νομικὸν πάσχα ὁ
          Χριστὸς ἐν τῷ δείπνῳ, ἀλλὰ τὸ ἀληθινόν</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">Demonstratio
          quod Christus in Sacra Coena non legale sed verum comederit Pascha,</hi> may have been
         written by Philip. Its arguments are derived from Scripture and St. Epiphanius. The other
         work, consisting of five chapters, <hi rend="ital">De Fide et Caeremoniis Armeniorum,
          Jacobitarum, Chatzitzariorum et Romanorum seu Francorum,</hi> was published, with a Latin
         version, but without an author's name, in the <title>Auctarium Novum</title> of
         Combéfis, fol. Paris, 1648, vol. ii. col. 261, &amp;c., but was, on the authority of
         MSS., assigned by Combéfis, in a note, to Demetrius of Cyzicus [<hi rend="smallcaps">DEMETRIUS</hi>, No. 17], to whom it appears rightly to belong (comp. Cave, <hi rend="ital">Hist. Litt. Dissertatio I.</hi> p. 6; Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl.
          Graec.</hi> vol. 11.414). The Chatzitzarii (<foreign xml:lang="grc">Χατζιτζάριοι</foreign>) were a sect who paid religious homage to the image of the
         Cross, but employed no other images in their worship.</p></div></div><div><head>Confusion with Demetrius</head><p>The work of Demetrius appears under the name of Philip in the fourteenth (posthumous)
        volume of the <title>Bibliotheca Patrum</title> of Galland ; but the editors, in their <hi rend="ital">Prolegomena</hi> to the volume, 100.15, observe that they knew not on what
        authority Galland had assigned it to Philip. Among the pieces given as <hi rend="ital">Appendices</hi> to the <title>Dioptra,</title> are some verses in praise of the work and
        its author, by one Constantine, perhaps the person addressed in No. 2, and by Bestus or
        Vestus, a grammarian, <foreign xml:lang="grc">Στίχοι κυροῦ Κωνσταντίνου καὶ Βέστου
         τοῦ γραμματικοῦ</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">Versus Domini Constantini et Vesti
         Grammatici.</hi></p></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Lambecius, <hi rend="ital">Commentar. de Biblioth. Caesarea.</hi> lib. s. vol. v. col.
        76-97, and 141, codd. 213, 214, 215, and 232, ed Kollar; Cave, <hi rend="ital">Hist.
         Litt.</hi> ad ann. 1095, vol. ii. p. 163; Oudin, <hi rend="ital">De Scriptorib.
         Eccles.</hi> vol. ii. col. 851.</p></div></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-58" n="philippus_58"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname><addName full="yes">SOPHISTA.</addName></persName></head><p>28. <hi rend="smallcaps">SOPHISTA.</hi> [No. 13.]</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-59" n="philippus_59"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname><addName full="yes">STUDITA.</addName></persName></head><p>29. <hi rend="smallcaps">STUDITA.</hi> In the notice of the <title xml:lang="la">Adversaria
        Gerardi Langbaini</title> contained in the <title xml:lang="la">Catalogus MStorum Angliae et
        Hiberniae,</title> vol. i. p. 269. the eighth volume of Langbaine's collection is said to
       contain a notice, <title xml:lang="la">De Philippi Studitae Historia Graeca.</title> Of the
       historian or his work there is, we believe, no notice in any extant writer; and as the
       preceding article in Langbaine's book is described as <title xml:lang="la">Scholae
        Alexandrinae Paedagogorum Successio</title>, and is probably the fragment of the work of
       Philip of Side, already noticed [No. 26], we suspect that "Studitae" is an error for
       "Sidetae," and that the <title xml:lang="la">Historia Graeca</title> is no other than his
        <title xml:lang="la">Historia Christiana,</title> which is termed <foreign xml:lang="la">Graeca</foreign>, not because it treats of Grecian affairs, but is written in the Greek
       language.</p><div><head>Further Information</head><p><hi rend="ital">Catal. MStorum Angliae, &amp;c. l.c. ;</hi> Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl.
         Graec.</hi> vol. xi. p. 709.</p></div></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-60" n="philippus_60"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname></persName></head><p>30. Of <hi rend="smallcaps">THEANGELA</hi> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ὁ
        Θεαγγελεύς</foreign>), a writer cited by Athenaeus, (vi. p. 271b) and by Strabo (<bibl n="Strabo xiv.p.662">xiv. p.662</bibl>). Theangela, from which Philip received his
       designation, apparently as being a native of it, was a city on the most eastern promontory of
       Caria, not far from Halicarnassus. Of the age of Philip nothing is known, except that he was
       earlier than Strabo; but if there is any reason for identifying him with Philip Isangelus
        (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ὁ Εἰσαγγελεύς</foreign>), mentioned by Plutarch (No. 14), he
       must be placed after the time of Alexander the Great.</p><div><head>Works</head><div><head>History of Caria</head><p>He wrote a history of Caria, the title or description of which is thus given by Athenaeus
          (<hi rend="ital">l.c.</hi>), <foreign xml:lang="grc">Περὶ Καρῶν καὶ Λελέγων
          σύγγραμμα ;</foreign> and by Strabo more briefly, <foreign xml:lang="grc">Καρικά</foreign>. The work is lost.</p></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Vossius, <hi rend="ital">De Hist. Graec.</hi> lib. iii.</p></div></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-61" n="philippus_61"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname></persName></head><p>31. <hi rend="smallcaps">THEOPOMPI</hi>
       <hi rend="smallcaps">EPITOMATOR.</hi> (Comp. Photius, <hi rend="ital">Biblioth.</hi> cod.
       176.)</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-62" n="philippus_62"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname></persName></head><p>32. Of <hi rend="smallcaps">THESSALONICA.</hi> [See below.] [<ref target="author.J.C.M">J.C.M</ref>]</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="philippus-bio-63" n="philippus_63"><head><persName xml:lang="la" xml:id="tlg-1589"><surname full="yes">Philippus</surname></persName></head><p>of Thessalonica, an epigrammatic poet, who, besides composing a large number of epigrams
       himself, compiled one of the ancient Greek Anthologies.</p><div><head>Works</head><div><head>Epigrams</head><p>The whole number of epigrams ascribed to him in the Greek Anthology is nearly ninety; but
         of these, six (Nos. 36-41) ought to be ascribed to Lucillius, and a few others are
         manifestly borrowed from earlier poets, while others are mere imitations. [Comp. above, <hi rend="smallcaps">PHLIPPUS</hi>, literary, Nos. 10 and 15.] They include nearly all the
         different classes of subjects treated of in the Greek epigrammatic poetry.</p></div><div><head>The Anthology of Philip</head><p>The <hi rend="ital">Anthology</hi> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἀντηολογψ</foreign>) of
         Philip, in imitation of that of Meleager, and as a sort of supplement to it, contains
         chiefly the epigrams of poets who lived in, or shortly before, the time of Philip. These
         poets were the following : Antipater of Thessalonica, Crinagoras, Antiphilus, Tullius,
         Philodemus, Parmenion, Antiphanes, Automedon <pb n="293"/> Zonas, Bianor, Antigonus,
         Diodorus, Evenus, and some others whose names he does not mention. The earliest of these
         poets seems to be Philodemus, the contemporary of Cicero, and the latest Automedon, who
         probably flourished under Nerva. Hence it is inferred that Philip flourished in the time of
         Trajan. Various allusions in his own epigrams prove that he lived after the time of
         Augustus.</p></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Jacobs, <hi rend="ital">Anth. Graec.</hi> vol. xiii. pp. 934-936.</p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.P.S">P.S</ref>]</byline></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>