<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.pherecydes_2</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.pherecydes_2</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="P"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="pherecydes-bio-2" n="pherecydes_2"><head><persName xml:lang="la" xml:id="tlg-0630"><surname full="yes">Pherecy'des</surname></persName></head><p>1. Of <hi rend="smallcaps">SYROS</hi>, one of the Cyclades, was a son of Babys. The name of
      his birthplace, coupled with the traditions respecting the Eastern origin of his philosophical
      opinions, led many writers to state that he was born in Syria or Assyria. There is some
      difference respecting his date. Suidas places him in the time of Alyattes, king of Lydia,
      Diogenes Laertius (1.121) in the 59th Olympiad <date when-custom="-544">B. C. 544</date>. Now as
      Alyattes died in the 54th Olympiad, both these statements cannot be correct, and the attempt
      of Mr. Clinton to reconcile them (<hi rend="ital">F. H.</hi> ad ann. 544), cannot be admitted,
      as Miller has shown (<hi rend="ital">Fragm. Hist. Graec.</hi> p. xxxiv.). The date of Diogenes
      is the more probable one, and is supported by the authority of Cicero, who makes Pherecydes a
      contemporary of Servius Tullius (<hi rend="ital">Tusc.</hi> 1.16).</p><p>According to the concurrent testimony of antiquity, Pherecydes was the teacher of
      Pythagoras. It is further stated by many later writers, such as Clemens Alexandrinus, Philo
      Byblius, &amp;c., the references to whom are all given in the work of Sturtz quoted below,
      that Pherecydes did not receive instruction in philosophy from any master, but obtained his
      knowledge from the secret books of the Phoenicians. Diogenes Laertius relates (1.116, 2.46)
      that Pherecydes heard Pittacus, and was a rival of Thales; which latter statement also occurs
      in Suidas. It is further related, that, like Thales and Pythagoras, Pherecydes was a disciple
      of the Egyptians and Chaldaeans, and that he travelled in Egypt. (Joseph. <hi rend="ital">c.
       Apion.</hi> p. 1034e.; Cedrenus, i. p. 94b.; Theodorus Meliteniota, <hi rend="ital">Prooem.
       in Astron.</hi> 100.12.) But all such statements cannot, from the nature of the case, rest on
      any certain foundation. The other particulars related of Pherecvdes are not worth recording
      here : those who are curious in such matters will find some details in the sections devoted to
      him in Diogenes Laertius (1.116-122). It may just be mentioned that, according to a favourite
      tradition in antiquity, Pherecydes died of the lousy disease or Morbus Pediculosus; though
      others tell us that he put an end to his life by throwing himself down from a rock at Delphi,
      and others again give other accounts of his death.</p><div><head>Works</head><p>Pherecydes was, properly speaking, not a philosopher. He lived at the time at which men
       began to speculate on cosmogony and the nature of the gods, but had hardly yet commenced the
       study of true philosophy. Hence he is referred to by Aristotle (<bibl n="Aristot. Met. 13.1078b">Aristot. Met. 13.4</bibl>) as partly a mythological writer; and
       Plutarch (<bibl n="Plut. Sull. 36">Plut. Sull. 36</bibl>) as well as many other writers give
       him the title of Theologus.</p><div><head><foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἑπτάμυχος</foreign></head><p>The most important subject which he is said to have taught was the doctrine of the
        Metempsychosis, or, as it is put by other writers, the doctrine of the immortality of the
        soul (Suidas ; Cic. <hi rend="ital">Tusc.</hi> 1.16). He gave an account of his views in a
        work, which was extant in the Alexandrian period. It was written in prose, which he is said
        to have been the first to employ in the explanation of philosophical questions: others go
        even so far as to state that he was the first who wrote any thing in prose, but this honour,
        however, must be reserved for Cadmus of Miletus. The title, which Pherecydes himself gave to
        his work, seems to have been <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἑπτάμυχος</foreign>, though others
        called it <foreign xml:lang="grc">Θεοκρασία</foreign>, and others again <foreign xml:lang="grc">Θεογονία</foreign> or <foreign xml:lang="grc">Θεολογία</foreign>.
        Suidas says that it was in two books; and there is no reason.for rejecting this statement on
        account of its title <title xml:lang="grc">Ἑπτάμυχος</title>, since this title has
        evident reference to the nature of its contents.</p><p>He maintained that there were three principia (Zeus or Aether, Chthona or Chaos, and
        Cronos or Time), and four elements (fire, earth, air, and water), from which were formed
        every thing that exists.</p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>