<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.phayllus_3</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.phayllus_3</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="P"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="phayllus-bio-3" n="phayllus_3"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Phayllus</surname></persName></head><p>3. A Phocian, brother of Onomarchus, whom he sicceeded as general of the Phocians in the
      Sacred War. He had already held important commands und r his brother, by whom he had been sent
      with an army of 7000 men to support Lycophron of Pherae against Philip of Macedon. (On that
      occasion he was unsuccessful, being defeated by Philip and driven out of Thessaly; but on the
      death of Onomarchus, in <date when-custom="-352">B. C. 352</date>, he appears to have succeeded
      without opposition to the chief command. He immediately set to work to restore the affairs of
      the Phocians. By an unsparing use of the vast treasures at his disposal, and by doubling the
      pay of his mercenaries, he quickly re-assembled a numerous army, in addition to which
      auxiliaries were furnished him by the Achaeans, Lacedaemonians, and Athenians, and the
      fugitive tyrants of Pherae, Lycophron and Peitholaus, also joined him with a body of
      mercenaries. The success of his military operations was, however, far from corresponding to
      these great preparations. He invaded Boeotia ; but was defeated in three successive actions,
      apparently none of them very decisive, as we next find him turning his arms against the
      Epicnemidian Locrians, and hostilities were carried on with alternations of success but no
      striking result. Meanwhile Phayllus himself was attacked with a lingering disorder of a
      consumptive kind, to which he fell a victim after a long and painful illness, A. 100.351.
       (<bibl n="Diod. 16.35">Diod. 16.35</bibl>_<bibl n="Diod. 16.38">38</bibl>, <bibl n="Diod. 16.61">61</bibl>; <bibl n="Paus. 10.2.6">Paus. 10.2.6</bibl> ; Harpocr. <hi rend="ital">v.</hi>
      <foreign xml:lang="grc">Φάϋλλος</foreign>.) In this natural disease his enemies saw as
      plainly as in the violent deaths of his predecessors the retributive justice of the offended
      deities.</p><p>It appears certain that Phayllus had made use of the sacred treasures with a far more lavish
      hand than either of his brothers, and he is accused of bestowing the consecrated ornaments
      upon his wife and mistresses. (<bibl n="Diod. 16.61">Diod. 16.61</bibl> ; Theopomp. apud <hi rend="ital">A then.</hi> xiii. p. 605; Ephor. <hi rend="ital">ibid.</hi> vi. p. 232.) The
      chief command in his hands appears to have already assumed the character of a monarchy (Dem.
       <hi rend="ital">c. Aristocr.</hi> p. 661), and began even to be regarded as hereditary, so
      that he left it at his death to his nephew Phalaecus, though yet a minor. [<hi rend="smallcaps">PHALAECUS.</hi>] </p><byline>[<ref target="author.E.H.B">E.H.B</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>