<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.pharnaces_i_5</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.pharnaces_i_5</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="P"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="pharnaces-i-bio-5" n="pharnaces_i_5"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Pha'rnaces</surname><genName full="yes">I.</genName></persName></label></head><p>1. (<foreign xml:lang="grc">Φαρνάκης</foreign>), king of Pontus, was the son of
      Mithridates IV., whom he succeeded on the throne. (<bibl n="Just. 38.5">Just. 38.5</bibl>,
       <bibl n="Just. 38.6">6</bibl> ; Clinton, <hi rend="ital">F. H.</hi> vol. iii. pp. 424, 425).
      The date of his accession cannot be fixed with certainty, but it is assigned conjecturally by
      Mr. Clinton to about <date when-custom="-190">B. C. 190</date>. It is certain, at least, that he was
      on the throne before <date when-custom="-183">B. C. 183</date>, in which year he succeeded in
      reducing the important city of Sinope, which had been long an object of ambition to the kings
      of Pontus. The Rhodians sent an embassy to Rome to complain of this aggression, but without
      effect. (<bibl n="Strabo xii.p.545">Strab. xii. p.545</bibl>; <bibl n="Plb. 24.0">Plb.
       24.0</bibl> ; <bibl n="Liv. 40.2">Liv. 40.2</bibl>.) About the same time Pharmaces became
      involved in disputes with his neighbour, Eumelnes, king of Pergamus, which led to repeated
      embassies from both monarchs to Rome, as well as to partial hostilities. But in the spring of
      181, without waiting for the return of his ambassadors, Pharnaces suddenly attacked both
      Eumenes and Ariarathes, and invaded Galatia with a large force. Eumenes opposed him at the
      head of an army : but hostilities were soon suspended by the arrival of the Roman deputies,
      appointed by the senate to inquire into the matters in dispute. Negotiations were accordingly
      opened at Pergamus, but led to no result, the demands of Pharnaces being rejected by the
      Romans as unreasonable; and the war was in consequence renewed. It continued, apparently with
      various interruptions, until the summer of <date when-custom="-179">B. C. 179</date>, when
      Pharnaces, finding himself unable to cope with the combined forces of Eumenes and Ariarathes,
      was compelled to purchase peace by the cession of all his conquests in Galatia and
      Paphlagonia, with the exception of Sinope. (<bibl n="Plb. 25.2">Plb. 25.2</bibl>, <bibl n="Plb. 25.4">4</bibl>, <bibl n="Plb. 25.6">6</bibl>, <bibl n="Plb. 26.6">26.6</bibl>; <bibl n="Liv. 40.20">Liv. 40.20</bibl>; Diod. xxix. <hi rend="ital">Exc. Vales.</hi> pp. 576, 577.)
      How long he continued to reign after this we know not; but it appears, from an incidental
      notice, that he was still on the throne iin <date when-custom="-170">B. C. 170</date>. (<bibl n="Plb. 27.15">Plb. 27.15</bibl>; Clinton, <hi rend="ital">F. H.</hi> vol. iii. p. 426.) The
      impartial testimony of Polvbius confirms the complaints of Eumenes and the Romans in regard to
      the arrogant and violent character of Pharnaces. </p><byline>[<ref target="author.E.H.B">E.H.B</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>