<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.phanodemus_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.phanodemus_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="P"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="phanodemus-bio-1" n="phanodemus_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la" xml:id="tlg-1583"><surname full="yes">Phanode'mus</surname></persName></head><p>(<persName xml:lang="grc"><surname full="yes">Φανόδημος</surname></persName>), the author of one of
      those works on the legends and antiquities of Attica, known under the name of Atthides. The
       <pb n="238"/> age and birthplace of Phanodemus are uncertain. It has been conjectured, from a
      passage in Proclus (<hi rend="ital">ad Platon. Tim.</hi> p. 30, ed. Basil.), that Theopompus
      wrote against him, but the passage in Proclus does not prove this. Phanodeinus must in any
      case have lived before the time of Augustus, as he is cited both by the grammarian Didymus
      (Harpocrat. <hi rend="ital">s. v.</hi>
      <foreign xml:lang="grc">γαμηλία</foreign>) and Dionysius of Halicarnassus (1.61). The
      birthplace of Phanodemus would, according to a passage of Hesychius (<hi rend="ital">s.
       v.</hi>
      <foreign xml:lang="grc">Φαλεοί</foreign>), be Tarentum, since the latter speaks both of
      Phanodemus and Rhinthon as <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ταρεντῖνοι;</foreign> but it has been
      well conjectured, that we ought in this passage to read <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ταρεντῖνος</foreign>, thus making Rhinthon alone the Tarentine. It is much more probable
      that he was a native of the little island of Iclus, one of the Cyclades, since we know that he
      wrote a special work on that island. In any case he identified himself with Attica, and speaks
      with enthusiasm of its greatness and glory.</p><div><head>Works</head><p>Three works of Phanodemus are cited, but of these the first was by far the most
       important.</p><div><head>1. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἀτθίς</foreign></head><p><foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἀτθίς</foreign>, which has been already spoken of. It must
        have been a work of considerable extent, as the ninth book is referred to (Harpocrat. <hi rend="ital">s. v.</hi><foreign xml:lang="grc">Λεωκόρειον</foreign>). We annex a few of the passages of the
        ancient writers, in which it is quoted : a complete list is contained in the works of which
        we give the titles below (<bibl n="Ath. 3.114">Athen. 3.114</bibl>c. ix. p. 392d. x. p.
        437c. xi. p. 465a.; Plut. <hi rend="ital">Them.</hi><hi rend="ital">13, Cim.</hi> 12, 19).</p></div><div><head>2. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Δηλιακά</foreign></head><p><foreign xml:lang="grc">Δηλιακά</foreign> (Harpocrat. <hi rend="ital">s. v.</hi>
        <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἑκάτης νῆσος</foreign>). There seems no good reason for
        changing the name of Phanodemus into that of Phanodicus in this passage of Harpocration, as
        Vossius has done, nor to adopt the alteration of Siebelis, by which the work is assigned to
        Semus.</p></div><div><head>3. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἰκιακά</foreign></head><p><foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἰκιακά</foreign>, an account of the island of Icus (Steph.
        Byz. <hi rend="ital">s. v.</hi><foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἰκός</foreign>.</p></div></div><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>The fragments of Phanodemus have been collected by Siebelis, <hi rend="ital">Phanodemonis, §c., Fragmenta,</hi> Lips. 1812 (p. v. and pp. 3-14)</bibl>, and by
        <bibl>C. and Th. Müller, <hi rend="ital">Fragmeta Historicorum Graecorumn,</hi> Paris,
        1841 (pp. lxxxiii. lxxxvii. and pp. 366-370).</bibl></p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>