<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.petrus_26</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.petrus_26</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="P"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="petrus-bio-26" n="petrus_26"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Petrus</surname><addName full="yes">PATRICIUS</addName></persName></head><p>25. <hi rend="smallcaps">PATRICIUS</hi> et <hi rend="smallcaps">MAGISTER</hi>, a Byzantine
      historian of the sixth century. He was born at Thessalonica (Procop. <hi rend="ital">De Bell.
       Gotthic.</hi> 1.3), in the province of Macedonia, then included in the praetorian praefecture
      of Illyricum, on which account he is said to have been an Illyrian. (Procop.l.c.) Peter
      settled at Constantinople, where he acquired distinction as a rhetor or advocate, a profession
      for which his cultivated mind, agreeable address, and natural powers of persuasion, were
      admirably adapted. These qualifications pointed him out to the discernment of the emperor
      Justinian I. as suited for diplomatic life, and he was sent by him (<date when-custom="534">A. D.
       534</date>) as ambassador to Amalasuntha. regent, and Theodatus, one of the chieftains of the
      Ostrogoths in Italy. On his way, at Aulon, near the entrance of the Adriatic, on the coast of
      Epeirus, or perhaps before his arrival there, Peter heard of the death of Athalaric, the young
      Ostrogothic king, of the marriage of Amalasuntha and Theodatus and their exaltation to the
      throne of Italy, and of their subsequent dissensionsand the imprisonment of Amalasuntha.
      heconsequently despatched intelligence of these important events to the emperor, while he
      himself waited at Aulon for further instructions. Justinian, without delay, undertook to
      vindicate the cause of the imprisoned queen, and directed Peter to declare his purpose openly
      to Theodatus. Peter immediately proceeded (<date when-custom="535">A. D. 535</date>), to Italy; but
      his arrival was speedily followed by the murder of Amalasuntha, an event extremely opportune
      for the ambitious views of Justinian, who. through Peter, immediately declared war against the
      Ostrogoths, on account of the queen's death. Such is the account given in one place by
      Procopius (ibid. 100.4); but he elsewhere (<hi rend="ital">Hist. Arcan.</hi> 100.16) charges
      Peter with instigating Theodatus to commit the murder, being secretly commissioned to do so by
      the jealousy of Theodora, Justinian's wife, who held out to him, as an inducement to comply
      with her desire, the hope of great advancement. The baseness of Theodatus was alarmed by the
      declaration of war, and by the successes of Belisarins, who rapidly conquered Sicily; and he
      negotiated with Peter, who had not yet quitted Ravenna, a peace by which he ceded Sicily to
      Justinian, engaged to pay a yearly tribute in money, and to furnish him yearly with a body of
      Ostrogothic soldiers ; he consented also to restrict the exercise of his own power within very
      narrow limits, and to exercise it under the supremacy of Justinian. He at the same time
      commissioned Peter, in case the emperor should reject these terms, to promise an unconditional
      abdication; binding him, however, by oath not to reveal this second offer, unless the emperor
      should have previously rejected the first. Peter returned to Byzantium: the first offer was
      rejected, and the second then divulged and accepted ; and Peter with another ambassador,
      Athanasius, was sent back to Italy to complete the arrangement. But Theodatus meanwhile,
      encouraged by some disasters which the Byzantine forces had sustained in Dalmatia, had changed
      his mind : he not only refused to fulfil his promise of submission, but violated the law of
      nations by imprisoning the ambassadors. (Ibid. <hi rend="ital">De Bell. Gotthico,</hi> 1.6-8.)
      Peter and his colleague remained in captivity until Belisarius, by detaining some Ostrogothic
      ambassadors, compelled Vitiges, who had succeeded Theodatus, to release them about the end of
       <date when-custom="438">A. D. 438</date>. (Ibid. 2.22.) On his return, Peter received, as Procopius
       (<hi rend="ital">Hist. Arcan.</hi> 100.16,) intimates by Theodora's interest, and as a reward
      for his participation in procuring Amalasuntha's death, the high appointment of magister
      officiorum, but incurred, according to the same authority, general odium by the part he had
      acted. He exercised his authority with the most unbridled rapacity; for although he was,
      according to Procopius, naturally of a mild temper, and by no means insolent, he was at the
      same time the most dishonest of all mankind, <foreign xml:lang="grc">κλεπτίστατος δὲ
       ἀνθρώπων ἁπάντων.</foreign> Ibid. 100.24.)</p><p>Several years afterwards (about <date when-custom="550">A. D. 550</date>), Peter, who retained his
      post of magister officiorum, and had in addition acquired the dignity of patrician (a dignity
      which Niebuhr not inaptly compares to that of privy councillor in England), was sent by
      Justinian to negotiate a peace with Chosroes I. king of Persia; but Chosroes, who did not
      desire peace, dismissed him, with a promise of sending an ambassador of his own to
      Constantinople to effect the proposed arrangement. Shortly afterwards (<date when-custom="551">A. D.
       551</date> or 552) Peter was engaged <pb n="227"/> in some negotiations with Pope Vigililus,
      then at Chalcedon : at this time he possessed, in addition to his other honours, the dignity
      of ex-consul or consul codicillaris, and the office of referendarius. (Vigil. Papa, <hi rend="ital">Epistola ad Universam Eccles.</hi> apud <hi rend="ital">Concilia,</hi> vol. iii.
      col. 3. ed. Hardouin.) In <date when-custom="562">A. D. 562</date> Peter was again sent to arrange
      the terms of a peace with Chosroes; and meeting Zichus, the Persian commissioner at or near
      Dara in Mesopotamia, and afterwards proceeding to the court of Persia to negotiate with
      Chosroes himself, succeeded in concluding a treaty. Menander, who has narrated the affair at
      length <hi rend="ital">Excerpta de Legationibus,</hi> pp. 133-147, ed. Paris, pp. 88-99, ed.
      Venice, pp. 346-373, ed. Bonn), has given at some length several of the speeches of Peter
      during the negotiation. Peter died shortly after. (Menander, ibid.) some suppose he is the
      Petrus Rhetor mentioned in an <hi rend="ital">Epigramma</hi> (No. xviii.) of Leontius inthe
       <hi rend="ital">Anthologia</hi> (vol. iii. p. 107, ed. Brunck, vol. iv. p. 77, ed Jacobs), as
      killed by the falling of a theatre. He left a son named Theodore, who successively held the
      offices of magister officiorum and "comes largitionum," and was sent by the emperor Justin II.
       (<date when-custom="576">A. D. 576</date>) on an embassy to Chosroes. (Menander apud <hi rend="ital">Excerpta,</hi> 120, ed. Paris, p. 80, ed. Venice, p. 319, ed. Bonn, cum nota
      Valesii.) Peter was held in the highest esteem in his own day. Niebuhr has collected various
      testimonies of his reputation from Byzantine authors.</p><div><head>Works</head><p>Suidas, who has two articles on Peter (<foreign xml:lang="grc">Πέτρος ὁ
        ῥήτωρ</foreign> and <foreign xml:lang="grc">Πέτρος</foreign> simply) ascribes to him
       two works. <listBibl><bibl>1. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἱστορίαι</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">Historiae,</hi></bibl><bibl>2. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Πεὶ πολιτικῆς καταστάσεως</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">De Stato</hi> (or <hi rend="ital">De constitutione) Reipublicae.</hi></bibl></listBibl></p><div><head><title xml:lang="la">Historiae</title></head><p>Of the <title xml:lang="la">Historiae</title> considerable portions are preserved in the
         <title>Excerpta de Legationibus,</title> made by order of the emperor Constantine
        Pophyrogenitus. [<hi rend="smallcaps">CONSTANTINUS</hi> VII. ; <hi rend="smallcaps">PRISCUS.</hi>] The earliest extract latest to the transactions of the Caesar Julian,
        afterwards emperor, in Caul in the reign of Constantius II. From the date of theses extracts
        and a short fragment, subjoined to the <title>Excerpta</title> in the Bonn edition, Niebuhr
        infers that the <title>Historiae</title> began with Augustus, or rather with the second
        triumvirate, and continued to a period a little later than the time of Constantine the
        Great, where the <title>Historia</title> of Eunapius [<hi rend="smallcaps">EUNAPIUS</hi>]
        became more full. Niebuhr conjectures that Peter epitomized the <hi rend="ital">Historia</hi> of Dio Cassius as far as that work extended. The <hi rend="ital">De
         Reipublicae</hi> is conjectured by Angelo Mai to be the anonymous work composed in the form
        of a dialogue between the patrician Menas and the referendarius Thomas <foreign xml:lang="grc">Περὶ πολιτικῆς</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">Dr Re publica,</hi> briefly
        analysed by Photius (<hi rend="ital">Biblioth.</hi> Cod. 37), and of which Mai considered
        large fragments, deciphered in a palimpsest, and published by himself under the title <title xml:lang="grc">Περὶ πολιτικη-ς ἐπιστήμης</title>, <hi rend="ital">De scientia
         Politica,</hi> in his <title xml:lang="la">Scriptorum Veterum Nova Collectio,</title> vol.
        ii. pp. 590, &amp;c. to be a part. But if the work mentioned by Suidas be, as is most
        likely, that in which Peter defined the duties of a magister officiorum, as noticed by
        Joannes Lydus (<hi rend="ital">De Magistratibus,</hi> 2.25. 26), and from which considerable
        portions (lib. 1. c.84, 85, certainly, and 100.86-95, probably) of the work of constantine
        Porphyrogenitus <hi rend="ital">De Caeremoniis Aulae byzantinae</hi> are taken, it must have
        been a different kind of work from that described by Photius. It is not ascertained in which
        of his works Peter published the account of his negotiations with Chosroes, whether in one
        of those mentioned by Suidas, or in some other work not mentioned. Menander, who cites the
        work (apud <hi rend="ital">Excerpta,</hi> p. 429, ed Bonn), describes it as <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἡ τοῦ αὐτοῦ Πέτρου συναγωγή</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">Ejusdem
         Petri Collectio,</hi> a title somewhat indefinite, but which seems to indicate a different
        work from either of those mentioned by Suidas. The accounts could not have been given in the
         <title>Historiae,</title> unless this came down to a much later period than Niebuhr
        supposes; but it may have formed part of the <title>De Reipublicae Statu,</title> if we
        suppose a part of that work to have been devoted to defining and illustrating the duty of
        ambassadors.</p></div></div><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>All the remains of Peter are given in the Bonn edition of the <title>Excerpta de
         Legationibus,</title></bibl>.</p></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>The valuable prefatory dissertation tation by Niebuhr, <hi rend="ital">De Historicis quorum
        Reliquiae hoc Volumine continentur,</hi> has been our chief guide in this article.</p><p>Compare Reiske's <hi rend="ital">Praefatio,</hi> c. ii. to the work of Constantine
       Porphyrogenitus <hi rend="ital">De Caeremoniis ;</hi> the dissertation by Mai, <hi rend="ital">De Fragmentis Politicis Petri Magistri,</hi> in the volume already cited of his
        <title xml:lang="la">Scriptorum Veterum Nova Collectio,</title> pp. 571, &amp;c.; Fabric.
        <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Craec.</hi> vol. vi. p. 135, vol. vii. p. 538, vol. viii. p. 33; and
       Vossius, <hi rend="ital">De Historicis Graecis,</hi> 2.100.22.</p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>