<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.perseus_5</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.perseus_5</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="P"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="perseus-bio-5" n="perseus_5"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Perseus</surname></persName></head><p>a painter, the disciple of Apelles, who addressed to him a work upon painting. At least so
      we understand the somewhat ambiguous passage of Pliny (<bibl n="Plin. Nat. 35.10.36.23">Plin.
       Nat. 35.10. s. 36.23</bibl>), <hi rend="ital">"Apellis discipulus Perseus, ad qwuetm de hae
       arte scripsit,"</hi> which is generally understood to mean the converse, namely, that Perseus
      wrote upon painting to Apelles. Their former interpretation is, we think, more strictly
      grammatical; also. it was more nattiural and usual for a great master to write a work for the
      instruction of a favonrite pupil, than for a pupil to inscribe a work to his master ; and,
      above all, the name of Perseus does not occur as a writer on painting, either in Pliny's lists
      of his authorities, or elsewhere, whereas it is well known that Apelles wrote upon his art.
      Perseus must have flourished about Ol. 118, <date when-custom="-308">B. C. 308</date>. </p><byline>[<ref target="author.P.S">P.S</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>