<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.paulus_16</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.paulus_16</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="P"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="paulus-bio-16" n="paulus_16"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Paulus</surname></persName> or
        <persName><surname full="yes">Paulus</surname><addName full="yes">the Persian</addName></persName></head><p>15. The <hi rend="smallcaps">PERSIAN.</hi> Paulus. a native of Persia, but said to have been
      a disciple of the heresiarch Nestorius, and a deacon of the church of Constatntinople, was one
      of the most ardent supporters of Nestorianisr at the time of the outbreak of the controversy
      respecting it. He wrote (1) a work, <foreign xml:lang="grc">Περὶ κρίσεως</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">De Judicio,</hi> and apparently (2) another work, <foreign xml:lang="grc">Περὶ τοῦ ὄντος ἀγαθοῦ</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">De vero Bono.</hi> A fragment of the
      former is quoted in the proceedings of the Lateran Council, held under Pope Martin I., <date when-custom="649">A. D. 649</date> (Actio s. Secretaries v. apud <hi rend="ital">Concilia,</hi>
      vol. vi. col. 320. ed. Labbe), and by the confiessor St. Maximus [<hi rend="smallcaps">MAXIMUS</hi>
      <hi rend="smallcaps">CONFESSOR</hi>], in his <title xml:lang="la">Tomus Dogmaticus adversus
       Hleracii Ecthesin</title> (<hi rend="ital">Opera,</hi> vol. ii. p. 91, ed. Combéfis).
      An extract on the subject indicated by the title of the second work, and from which the
      existence of the work itself is illferred, is among the Excerpta Miscelanca, extant in MS. in
      the Imperial Library at Vienna. It may be that the title is appropriate&gt; only to the
      extract. and that this may be taken from the work <hi rend="ital">De Judicio</hi> (Cave, <hi rend="ital">Hist. Litt.</hi> ad ann, 436, vol. i. p. 426.)</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>