<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.patricius_9</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.patricius_9</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="P"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="patricius-bio-9" n="patricius_9"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Patri'cius</surname></persName></head><p>the apostle and patron saint of Ireland. The legends and traditions respecting this
      celebrated personage, preserved in the Acta Sanctorum, in his life by Jocelin, a monk of
      Furness abbey, in Lancashire, who flourished during the twelfth century, and in the Irish
      annals and ecclesiastical records, present such a mass of contradictions and improbabilities,
      that many critics have been induced to deny his very existence, while others have sought to
      remove a portion of the difficulties which embarrass the inquiry, .by supposing that there
      were two, three, four, or even five individuals who flourished at periods not very remote from
      each other, who all bore the name Patricius, and who were all more or less concerned in the
      conversion of Ireland from paganism. The only document in which we can repose any confidence
      is an ancient tract entitled <title>Confessio S. Patricii,</title> a sort of autobiography, in
      which he gives an outline of his life and conversation. If we admit that this curious piece is
      genuine, we may perhaps learn from it'that the author was a native of Scotland, born in the
      village of <hi rend="ital">Benaven</hi> or <hi rend="ital">Bonavemn Taberniae,</hi> which is
      generally believed to have occupied the site of the modern Kilpatrick, situated on the right
      bank of the river Clyde, a few miles above Dumbarton, very near the point which marked the
      termination of the Roman wall. He was the son of Calpornius, a deacon, the grandson of
      Potitus, a presbyter. At the age of sixteen he was taken prisoner by pirates, and conveyed
      along with a number of his countrymen to Ireland, where he was employed as a shepherd. Having
      made his escape, he reached home in safety; but in the course of a few years was again carried
      off, and in two months again obtained his freedom. During his first captivity he was led to
      meditate upon his own depraved and lost condition, was gradually awakened to a sense of the
      truth, and became filled with an earnest desire to proclaim the promises of the Gospel to the
      heathen by whom he was surrounded. Visions were vouchsafed to him from on high, on several
      occasions he was empowered to work miracles, and at length, under the conviction that he was
      directly summoned by Heaven, determined to devote his life to the task thus imposed upon him
      by God. No allusion whatsoever is made to his visit to France and Italy or to his ordination
      by Pope Coelestinus, upon which so much stress is laid in the later and more formal monkish
      compilations.</p><p>It must not be concealed, however, that although a lively local tradition supports the
      opinion that Kilpatrick in Dumbartonshire was the birth-place of the saint, and although the
      inhabitants of that district still point out a miraculous fountain and a rock bearing his
      name, many of the most learned Irish historians maintain that the epithet <hi rend="ital">Brito.</hi> upon which so much has been founded, refers not to Britain but to Armorica, and
      bring forward strong evidence to prove that <hi rend="ital">Bonavem Taberniae</hi> is
      Boulogne-sur-mer on the coast of Picardy. The arguments are stated very fully in Lanigan's
      Eccle siastical History of Ireland, chapter iii.</p><p>According to several of the most ancient national authorities the mission of St. Patrick
      commenced during the reign of Laoghaire, son of Niall of the Nine Hostages (A. D. 429-458);
      but the book of Lecan places him under Lughaidh, a son of the former (<date when-custom="484">A. D.
       484</date>-<date when-custom="508">508</date>), while the Annals of Connaught assign his birth to
       <date when-custom="336">A. D. 336</date>, and his captivity to <date when-custom="352">A. D. 352</date>.
      Mr. Petrie, in his learned dissertation on the History and Antiquities of Tara Hill, enters
      deeply into the investigation, and arrives at the conclusion that if we assume that there was
      a second Patrick in Ireland during the fifth century, and that many of the acts of the first
      or great St. Patrick have been falsely ascribed to his namesake and successor, then Irish as
      well as foreign testimonies nearly concur in the following facts: -- 1. That he was born in
      the year 372. 2. That he was brought captive into Ireland in the sixteenth year of his age, in
      388, and that after four or seven years' slavery he was liberated in 392 or 395. 3. That on
      the death of Palladius, in 432, he was sent to Ireland as archbishop, having been first,
      according to some authorities, consecrated by Pope Coelestinus, or, as others state, in Gaul,
      by the archbishop Amatorex, or Amator. 4. That he arrived in Ireland in 432, and after
      preaching there for sixty years, died in the year 492 or 493, at the age of about one hundred
      and twenty years. 5. That he was interred either at Saul or Down.</p><div><head>Works</head><p>Several works still extant bear the name of Patricius.</p><div><head>I. <title xml:lang="la">Confessio S. Patricii de Vita et Conversatione
        sua</title></head><p>This, as may be gathered from what has been said above, is not, like many ecclesiastical
         <title xml:lang="la">Confessiones,</title> to be regarded as an exposition of the views of
        the author upon difficult points of doctrine and discipline, but as a sketch of his own
        religious life, and especially as an account of the mental process by which he was first
        roused to spiritual exertion, the narrative being addressed to the people among whom he
        preached the Word. It was first published by Ware, in his edition of the Opuscula attributed
        to St. Patrick, from several MSS. preserved in different parts of England and Ireland; among
        which is the renowned Book of Armagh, long believed to have been traced by the hand of the
        saint himself. To inquire into the authenticity of the Confession when so little can be
        ascertained with regard to the supposed author would be a mere waste of time; but it ought
        to be remarked that it is composed in a very rude style, and although evidently interpolated
        here and there, is to a considerable extent free from the extravagance which characterises
        the collections of the Bollandists and the memoir of Jocelin. The writer, whoever he may
        have been, alludes repeatedly to his own want of education and to his literary
        deficiencies.</p></div><div><head>II. <title xml:lang="la">Epistola ad Coroticumn,</title> or rather <title xml:lang="la">Epistola ad Christianos Corotici tyranni subditos</title>.</head><p>On the wickedness of a Welsh prince, Coroticus, who, in a descent upon Ireland, had taken
        many Christian prisoners, and was keeping them in cruel slavery. This letter is expressly
        mentioned by Jocelin.</p><pb n="139"/><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>It was first published in the Acta Sanctorum under the 17th of March from a very
          ancient MS., in which it was subjoined without a break to the <title xml:lang="la">Confessio.</title></bibl></p></div></div><div><head>III. <title xml:lang="la">Proverbia.</title></head><p>First published by Ware.</p></div><div><head>IV. <title xml:lang="la">Synodus S. Patticii</title></head><p>containing thirty-one canons.</p></div><div><head>V. <title xml:lang="la">Novem Canones S. Patricio</title>
        <title xml:lang="la">adscripti.</title></head><p/></div><div><head>VI. <title xml:lang="la">Synodus Patricii, Auxrilii et Isseruini episcoporum XXXIV.
         Canonibus constans.</title></head><div><head>Editions</head><p>The whole of the above canons, together with three others, are contained in
          <bibl>Spelman's <title xml:lang="la">Concilia, Decreta, &amp;c. in Re Ecclesiustica Orbis
           Britannici,</title> fol. Lond. 1639, vol. i. p. 51,&amp;c.</bibl>; <bibl>also in Wilkins,
           <title xml:lang="la">Concilia Magnae Brittanniae et Hiberniae,</title> fol. Lond. 1736-7,
          vol. i. p. 2, &amp;c.</bibl>; and <bibl>in Mansi, <title xml:lang="la">Collection
           Amplissima Conciliorumn,</title> fol. Florent. 1761, vol. vi. p. 514, &amp;c.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>Highly doubtful works</head><p>Doubtful as every one of the pieces now enumerated must be considered, they possess more
        claims upon our attention than the following, which also are ascribed to St. Patrick, but
        are now generally admitted to be unquestionably spurious.</p><div><head>I. <title xml:lang="la">Charta s. Epistola de Antiquitate Avalonica,</title></head><div><head>Editions</head><p>A fragment of which was made known by <bibl>Gerard Vossius in his <title xml:lang="la">Miscellanea sanctorum aliquot Patrum Gr. et Latt.,</title> 4to. Mogunt. 1604, under the
           title <title>S. Patricii Legatio a Coelestino prinmo Papa ad Conrersionern liberniae
            dirccti s. Epistola S. Patricii Apostoli Hiberniae ex Bibl. Monasterii Glastoniae in quo
            ipse Abbas fuit antequam esset Episcopus Hiberniae.</title></bibl></p><p>It was first published entire by Ware.</p></div></div><div><head>2. <title xml:lang="la">De tribus llabitaculis s. De Gaudiis Electorurm et Poenis
          Damnatorom Liber</title></head><p>Ascribed by some to Augustin.</p></div><div><head>3. <title xml:lang="la">De Abusionibus Saeculi</title></head><p>Ascribed by some to Cyprian, by others to Augustin.</p></div></div></div><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>The first complete edition of the tracts attributed to St. Patrick is that by Sir
        James Ware (Jacobus Waraeus), 8vo. Lond. 1656.</bibl><bibl>This was reprinted by Galland in his <title xml:lang="la">Bibliotheca Patrum,</title>
        vol. x. p. 159-182, fol. Venet. 1774</bibl>, together with some remarks taken from the
       Bollandists. See also his <title xml:lang="la">Proleg.</title> cap. iv. <bibl>The most recent
        and useful edition is that of Joachimus Laurentius Villanueva, 8vo. Dublin, 1835</bibl>,
       which contains a number of very serviceable annotations.</p></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>For an account of the statements contained in the Irish records, consult the essay by Mr.
       Petrie quoted above, which is to be found in the 18th volume of the Transactions of the Royal
       Irish Academy. See also Schönemann, <hi rend="ital">Biblioth. Patrum Lat.</hi> vol.
       2.40. </p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.W.R">W.R</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>