<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.papinianus_aemilius_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:P.papinianus_aemilius_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="P"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="papinianus-aemilius-bio-1" n="papinianus_aemilius_1"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><addName full="yes">Papinia'nus</addName>,
         <surname full="yes">Aemi'lius</surname></persName></label></head><p>was a pupil of Q. Cervidius Scaevola. An inscription records his parents to be Papinianus
      Hostilis and Eugenia Gracilis, and that they survived their son Aemilius Paullus Papinianus,
      who died in his thirty-seventh year. Aemilins Papinianus succeeded Septimius Severus,
      afterwards emperor, as Advocatus Fisci (Spartian. <hi rend="ital">Carucall.</hi> 8). Now
      Severus held this oftice under Marcus Antoninus, and he was employed in various high
      capacities by Marcus during his lifetime. Papinianus therefore was Advocatus Fisci during the
      reign of Marcus, who died <date when-custom="180">A. D. 180</date>. Severus became emperor <date when-custom="1">A. D. 1</date>.92, and died A. D. 211. There is therefore an interval of about
      thirty-two years between the death of Marcus and that of Severus, and consequently Papinianus,
      who held office under Marcus, and was put to death by Caracalla, the successor of Severus,
      must have been much more than thirty-six when he died.</p><p>Papinian is said to have been related to Julia Domna, the second wife of Severus. (Spart.
       <hi rend="ital">Caracall.</hi> 8.) He was highly esteemed by Severus, nnder whom he was
      Libellorum magister (<bibl n="Dig. 20">Dig. 20</bibl>. tit. 5. s. 12), and afterwards
      praefectus praetorio. (<bibl n="D. C. 76.10.14">D. C. 76.10. 14</bibl>.) Paulus (<bibl n="Dig. 12">Dig. 12</bibl>. tit. 1. s. 40) speaks of having delivered an opinion in the
      auditorium of Papinian. Paulus and Ulpian were both assessors to Papinian (Papiniano in
      consilio fuerunt, Spart. <hi rend="ital">Pescen. Niger,</hi> 7). Lampridius (<hi rend="ital">Alex. Severus,</hi> 68) enumerates the "juris professores," as he terms those who were
      pupils of Papinian: in the list are the names of Ulpian, Paulus, Pomponius, Africanus,
      Florentinus and Modestinus, the most distinguished among the great Roman jurists.</p><p>Severus came to Britain <hi rend="smallcaps">A. D</hi>. 208, in which year his sons M.
      Antoninus Caracalla and P. Septimius Geta were consuls, and he died at York <date when-custom="211">A. D. 211</date>. As Papinian was praefectus praetorio under Severus, and is mentioned as
      being summuned to the emperor's presence, when the design of Caracalla against his father's
      life was discovered, we may conclude that the illustrious jurist was in Britain during the
      residence of Severus; and he may have drawn up the rescript given by Severus in the last year
      but one of his reign, at York (A. D. 210). to one Caecilia. (Cod. 3. tit. 32. s. l.) It is
      also said that the emperor commended his two sons to the care of Papinian, which seems to
      imply that he was at York when Severus died there.</p><p>On the death of his father, Caracalla, according to Dion, dismissed Papinian from his
      office, and in the second year of his reign he murdered his brother Geta, while he was
      clinging to his another for protection. Papinian also was soon after put to death by the
      emperor's orders. The reasons given for his death were various, but it is easy to conceive
      that a tyrant like Caracalla would be satisfied with any excuse for getting rid of so stern a
      monitor and so honest a man. The pretext may have been that he was a partisan of Geta, or that
      he re fused to comply with the emperor's order to make a defence before the senate and the
      people of his brother's assassination (Spart. <hi rend="ital">Caracalla,</hi> 8); but
      Papinian's real crime was his abilities and his integrity. His biographer states (Spart. <hi rend="ital">Caracall.</hi> 4) that Papinian was beheaded in the emperor's presence, and that
      his son, who was then quaestor, perished about the same time. The dying words of Papinian
      warned his successor in the office of what his own fate might be, and they were prophetic ;
      for Macrinus, who did succeed him, rid the empire of its tyrannical master by assassination.
      (Spart. <hi rend="ital">Caracall</hi>. 8, 6.) Spartianus apparently supposed that Papinian was
      praefectus praetorio at the time of his death. (<bibl n="D. C. 77.1">D. C. 77.1</bibl>, and
      the note of Reimarus.)</p><p>There are 595 excerpts from Papinian's works in the Digest. These excerpts are from the
      thirtyseven books of <hi rend="ital">Quaestiones,</hi> a work arranged according to the order
      of the Edict, the nineteen books of <hi rend="ital">Responsa,</hi> the two books of <hi rend="ital">Definitiones,</hi> the two books <hi rend="ital">De Adultteriis,</hi> a single
      book <hi rend="ital">De Adulteriis,</hi> and a Greek work or fragment, intitled <title xml:lang="grc">ἐκ τοῦ ἀστυνομικοῦ μονοβίβλου τοῦ Παπινιανοῦ</title>, a work which
      probably treated of the office of aedile both at Rome and in other towns. Papinian is chiefly
      cited by Paulus and Ulpian; and he is also cited by Marcian. All these three jurists wrote
      notes on the works of Papinian, and in some cases at least dissented from him. The following
      references contain instances of annotations on Papinian :-- <bibl n="Dig. 22">Dig. 22</bibl>.
      tit. 1. s. 1.2; 18. tit. 1. s. 72; 1. tit. 21. s. 1.1; 3. tit. 5. s. 31.2.</p><p>No Roman jurist had a higher reputation than Papinian. Spartitnus (<hi rend="ital">Severus,</hi> 21) calls him "juris asylum et doctrine legalis thesaurus." The epithets of
      "prudentissimus," "consultissimus," "disertissimus," and others to the like effect, are
      bestowed upon him by various emperors. (Cod. 5. tit. 71. s. 14; 7. tit. 32. s. 3; 6. tit. 25.
      s. 9.)</p><p>As a practical jurist and a writer, few of his countrymen can be compared with him. Indeed
      the great commentator, who has devoted a whole folio to his remarks upon Papinian, declares
      that he was the first of all lawyers who have been or are to be, that no one ever surpassed
      him in legal knowledge, and no one ever will equal him. (Cujacius, <hi rend="ital">Opera,</hi>
      vol. iv., <hi rend="ital">In Prooem. ad Quaest. Papinian.</hi>) Nor is the reputation of
      Papinian unmerited. It was not solely because of the high station that he filled, his
      penetration and his knowledge, that he left an imperishable name; his excellent understanding,
      guided by integrity of purpose, has made him the model of a true lawyer. The fragments of
      Papinian are sometimes obscure, and require the aid of a commentator; but they will amply
      repay the labour that is necessary to seize the fullness of the meaning of this great master
      of jurisprudence.</p><p>A constitution of Theodosius and Valentinian (<hi rend="ital">Cod. Theeod.</hi> 1. tit. 4,
       <hi rend="ital">De Resposis Prmlentum</hi>) declared all the writings of Papinian, Paulus,
      Caius, Ulpian and Modestinus to be authority for the judge; the opinions of those jurists also
      were to have authority, whose discussions and opinions (tractattus et opinliones) all the five
      mentioned jurists had inserted in their writings, as Scaevola, Sabinus Julian and Marcellus:
      if the opinions of these jurists, as expressed in their writings, were not unanlimous, the
      opinion of the majority was to prevail; if there was an equal number on each side, <pb n="118"/> the opinion of that side was to prevail on which Papinian was (si numerus (auctorum)
      aequalis sit, ejus partes praecedat auctoribus in qua excellentis ingenii vir Papinianus
      emineat, qui, ut singulos vincit, ita cedit duobus). It was one of the characteristics of
      Papinian not to consider himself infallible, and he did not hesitate to change his opinion,
      when he found a better reason, of which there is an instance in the passages here referred to.
       (<bibl n="Dig. 18">Dig. 18</bibl>. tit. 7. s. 6.1; and Cod. 6. tit. 2. s. 22.3.) His strong
      moral feeling is indicated in another passage (<bibl n="Dig. 28">Dig. 28</bibl>. tit. 7. s.
      15), where he is speaking of conditions under which a heres may filial duty, to one's good
      name, to regard to decency, and generally, those which are against good morals (boni mores),
      must not be considered as conditions that a man can fulfil.</p><p>In the four years' course of study, as it existed before the time of Justinian, Papinian's
       <hi rend="ital">Responsa</hi> formed part of the third year's course, but only eight books
      out of the nineteen were explained to the students; and even this was done very imperfectly.
      In Justinian's course of studies, among other parts of the Digest, there were read in the
      third year, the twentieth, twenty-first and twenty-second books, which were intended to take
      the place of the exposition of Papinian formerly given in the third year's course; and it is
      stated that the students will in this manner become much better acquainted with Papinian. To
      make this intelligible, it should be observed, that all the titles of the twentieth book begin
      with an excerpt from Papinian, as Blume observes (<hi rend="ital">Zeitschrift,</hi> vol. iv.
      p. 294, <hi rend="ital">Ueber die ordnung der fragmente in den Pandecten);</hi> but he appears
      not to have observed that one of the titles of this book neither begins with nor contains any
      excerpt from Papinian. The students were also to retain the old designation of Papinianistae,
      which denoted students of the third year; and the festival which they used to celebrate on
      commencing their third year's course was still to be observed. (Const. <hi rend="ital">Omnem
       Reipublicae,</hi> s. 4, &amp;c.; Grotins, <hi rend="ital">Vitae Jurisconsultorum;</hi>
      Zimmern, <hi rend="ital">Geschichte des Roömischen Prinatrechts,</hi> vol. i. p. 361;
      Puchta, <hi rend="ital">Cursus,</hi> &amp;c. vol. i. p. 454; Cujacius, <hi rend="ital">Op.</hi> tom. iv. ed. Neapol. 1758.) </p><byline>[<ref target="author.G.L">G.L</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>