<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:O.orpheus_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:O.orpheus_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="O"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="orpheus-bio-1" n="orpheus_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Orpheus</surname></persName></head><p>(<label xml:lang="grc">Ὀρφεύς</label>) The history of the extant productions of Greek
      literature begins with the Homeric poems. But it is evident that works so perfect in their
      kind are the end, and not the beginning, of a course of poetical development. This assumption
      is confirmed by innumerable traditions, which record the names of poets before the time of
      Homer, who employed their music for the civilisation of men and for the worship of different
      divinities. In accordance with the spirit of Greek mythology, the gods themselves stand at the
      head of this succession of poets, namely, Hermes, the inventor of the lyre, and Apollo, who
      received the invention from his brother, and became the divinity presiding over the whole art
      of music. With Apollo are associated, still in the spirit of the old mythology, a class of
      subordinate divinities -- the Muses. The earliest human cultivators of the art are represented
      as the immediate pupils, and even (what, in fact, merely means the same thing) the children of
      Apollo and the Muses. Their personal existence is as uncertain as that of other mythical
      personages, and for us they can only be considered as the representatives of certain periods
      and certain kinds of poetical development. Their names are no doubt all significant, although
      the etymology of some of them is very uncertain, while that of others, such as Musaeus, is at
      once evident. The chief of <pb n="60"/> these names are Olen, Linus, Orpheus, Musaeus,
      Eumolpus, Pamphus, Thamyris, and Philammon.</p><p>Of these names that of Orpheus is the most important, and at the same time the one involving
      the greatest difficulties. These difficulties arise from the scantiness of the early
      traditions respecting specting him, in tracing which we are rather impeded than aided by the
      many marvels which later writers connected with his story; and also from the very different
      religious positions which are assigned to him. On this last point it may be remarked in
      general that the earliest opinions respecting him seem to have invariably connected him with
      Apollo; while his name was afterwards adopted as the central point of one system of Dionysiac
      worship.</p><p>One of the most essential points in such an inquiry as the present is, to observe the
      history of the traditions themselves. The name of Orpheus does not occur in the Homeric or
      Hesiodic poems ; but, during the lyric period, it had attained to great celebrity. Ibycus, who
      flourished about the middle of the sixth century B. C., mentions him as "the renowned Orpheus"
       (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ὀνομακλυτὸν Ὄρφην</foreign>, Ibyc. <hi rend="ital">Fr.</hi>
      No. 22, Schneidewin, No. 9, Bergk, apud <hi rend="ital"/> Priscian. vol. i. p. 283, Krehl).
      Pindar enumerates him among the Argonauts as the celebrated harp player, father of songs, and
      as sent forth by Apollo (<hi rend="ital">Pyth.</hi> 4.315. s. 176): elsewhere he mentioned him
      as the son of Oeagrus (Schol. <hi rend="ital">ad loc.</hi>). The historians Hellanicus and
      Pherecydes record his name, the former making him the ancestor both of Homer and of Hesiod
       (<hi rend="ital">Fr.</hi> Nos. 5, 6, Müller, apud <hi rend="ital"/> Procl. <hi rend="ital">Vit. Hes</hi>. p. 141b., <hi rend="ital">Vit. Hom. Ined.</hi>); the latter
      stating that it was not Orpheus, but Philammon, who was the bard of the Argonauts (<hi rend="ital">Fr.</hi> 63, Müller, apud <hi rend="ital">Schol. ad Apollon.</hi> 1.23), and
      this is also the account which Apollonius Rhodius followed. In the dramatic poets there are
      several references to Orpheus. Aeschylus alludes to the fable of his leading after him trees
      charmed by the sound of his lyre (<hi rend="ital">Ag.</hi> 1612, 1613, Wellauer, 1629, 1630,
      Dind.) ; and there is an important statement preserved by Eratosthenes (100.24), who quotes
      the <title>Bassarides</title> of the same poet, that "Orpheus did not honour Dionysus, but
      believed the sun to be the greatest of the gods, whom also he called Apollo; and rising up in
      the night, he ascended before dawn to the mountain called Pangaeum, that he might see the sun
      first, at which Dionysus being enraged sent upon him the Bassaridae, as the poet Aeschylus
      says, who tore him in pieces, and scattered his limbs abroad; but the Muses collected them,
      and buried them at the place called Leibethra :" but the quotation itself shows the
      impossibility of determining termining how much of this account is to be considered as given
      by Aeschylus. Sophocles does not mention Orpheus, but he is repeatedly referred to by
      Euripides, in whom we find the first allusion to the connection of Orpheus with Dionysus and
      the inffrnal regions: he speaks of him as related to the Muses (<hi rend="ital">Rhes.</hi>
      944, 946); mentions the power of his song over rocks, trees, and wild beasts (<hi rend="ital">Med.</hi> 543, <hi rend="ital">Iph. in Aul. 1211, Bacch.</hi> 561, and a jocular allusion in
       <hi rend="ital">Cyc.</hi> 646); refers to his charming the infernal powers (<hi rend="ital">Alc.</hi> 357,); connects him with Bacchanalian orgies (<hi rend="ital">Hippol.</hi>) 953;
      ascribes to him the origin of sacred mysteries (<hi rend="ital">Rhes.</hi> 943), and places
      the scene of his activity among the forests of Olympus. (<hi rend="ital">Bacch.</hi> 561.) He
      is mentioned once only, but in an important passage, by Aristophanes (<bibl n="Aristoph. Frogs 1032">Aristoph. Frogs 1032</bibl>), who enumerates, as the oldest poets,
      Orpheus, Musaeus, Hesiod, and Homer, and makes Orpheus the teacher of religious initiations
      and of abstinence from murder: <quote xml:lang="grc" rend="blockquote"><l>Ὀρφεὺς μὲν
        γὰρ τελετάς θʼ ἡμῖν</l><l>κατέδειξε φόνου τʼ ἀπέχεσθαι.</l></quote></p><p>Passages exactly parallel to this are found in Plato (<hi rend="ital">Apol.</hi> p. 41a.,
       <hi rend="ital">Protag.</hi> p.316, d.), who frequently refers to Orpheus, his followers, and
      his works. He calls him the son of Oeagrus (<hi rend="ital">Sympos.</hi> p. 179d.), mentions
      him as a musician and inventor (<hi rend="ital">Ion,</hi> p. 533c., <hi rend="ital">Leg.</hi>
      iii. p. 677d.), refers to the miraculous power of his lyre (<hi rend="ital">Protag.</hi> p.
      315a.), and gives a singular version of the story of his descent into lades: the gods, he
      says, imposed upon the poet, by showing him only a phantasm of his lost wife, because he had
      not the courage to die, like Alcestis, hut contrived to enter Hades alive, and, as a further
      punishment for his cowardice, He met his death at the hands of women (<hi rend="ital">Sympos.</hi> p. 179d.; comp. <hi rend="ital">Polit. x.</hi> p. 620a.). This account is quite
      discordant with the notions of the early Greeks respecting the value of life, and even with
      the example quoted by Plato himself, as far as Admetus is concerned. Plato seems to have
      misunderstood the reason why Orpheus's "contriving to enter Hades alive," called down the
      anger of the gods, namely, as a presumptuous transgression of the limits assigned to the
      condition of mortal men: this point will have to be considered again. As the followers of
      Orpheus, Plato mentions both poets and religionists (<hi rend="ital">Prot.</hi> p. 316d., <hi rend="ital">Ion,</hi> p. 536b., <hi rend="ital">Cratyl.</hi> p. 400c.), and in the passage
      last quoted, he tells us that the followers of Orpheus held the doctrine, that the soul is
      imprisoned in the body as a punishment for some previous sins. He makes several quotations
      from the writings ascribed to Orpheus, of which one, if not more, is from the
       <title>Theogony</title> (<hi rend="ital">Cratyl.</hi> p. 402b., <hi rend="ital">Phileb.</hi>
      p. 66c., <hi rend="ital">Leg.</hi> ii. p. 669d.), and in one passage he speaks of collections
      of books, which went under the names of Orpheus and Musaeus, and contained rules for religious
      ceremonies. (<hi rend="ital">Polit.</hi> ii. p. 364e.)</p><p>The writings mentioned in the last passage were evidently regarded by Plato as spurious,
      but, from the other passages quoted, he seems to have believed at least in the existence of
      Orpheus and in the genuineness of his <title xml:lang="la">Theogony.</title> Not so, however,
      Aristotle, who held that no such person as Orpheus ever existed, and that the works ascribed
      to him were forged by Cercops and Onomacritus. [<hi rend="smallcaps">ONOMACRITUS.</hi>]</p><p>Proceeding to the mythographers, and the later poets, from Apollodorus downwards, we find
      the legends of Orpheus amplified by details, the whole. of which it is impossible here to
      enumerate; we give an outline of the most important of them.</p><p>Orpheus, the son of Oeagrus and Calliope, lived in Thrace at the period of the Argonauts,
      whom he accompanied in their expedition. Presented with the lyre. by Apollo, and instructed by
      the Muses in its use, he enchanted with its music not only the wild beasts, but the trees and
      rocks upon Olympus, so that they moved from their places to follow the sound of his golden
      harp. The power of his music caused the Argonauts to seek his aid, which contributed
      materially to the success of their expedition: at the sound of his lyre the Argo glided down
      into the sea; the Argonauts <pb n="61"/> tore themselves away from the pleasures of Lennos;
      the Symplegadae, or moving rocks, which threatened to crush the ship between them, were fixed
      in their places; and the Colchian dragon, which guarded the golden fleece, was lulled to
      sleep: other legends of the same kind may be read in the <title>Argonautica,</title> which
      bears the name of Orpheus. After his return from the Argonautic expedition he took up his
      abode in a cave in Thrace, and employed himself in the civilisation of its wild inhabitants.
      There is also a legend of his having visited Egypt. The legends Irspecting the loss and
      recovery of his wife, and his own death, are very various. His wife was a nymph named Agriope
      or Eurydice. In the older accotlnts the cause of her death is not referred to, but the legend
      followed in the well-known passages of Virgil and Ovid, which ascribes the death of Eurydice
      to the bite of a serpent, is no doubt of high antiquity, but the introduction of Aristaeus
      into the legend cannot be traced to any writer older than Virgil himself. (<bibl n="Diod. 4.25">Diod. 4.25</bibl> ; <bibl n="Conon 45">Conon 45</bibl>; <bibl n="Paus. 9.30.4">Paus. 9.30.4</bibl>; <bibl n="Hyg. Fab. 164">Hyg. Fab. 164</bibl>.) He followed his lost
      wife into the abodes of Hades, where the charms of his lyre suspended the torments of the
      damned, and won back his wife from the most inexorable of all deities; but his prayer was only
      granted upon this condition, that he should not look back upon his restored wife, till they
      had arrived in the upper world: at the very moment when they were about to pass the fatal
      bounds, the anxiety of love overcame the poet; he looked round to see that Eurydice was
      following him; and he beheld her caught back into the infernal regions. The form of the myth,
      as told by Plato, has been given above. The later poets, forgetting the religious meaning of
      the legend, connected his death with the second loss of Eurydice, his grief for whom led him
      to treat with contempt the Thracian women, who in revenge tore him to pieces under the
      excitement of their Bacchanalian orgies. Other causes are assigned for the fury of the
      Thracian Maenads ; but the most ancient form of the legend seems to be that already mentioned
      as quoted by Eratosthenes from Aeschylus. The variation, by which Aphrodite is made the
      instigator of his death, from motives of jealousy, is of course merely a fancy of some late
      poet (Conon,<bibl n="Conon 45">45</bibl>). Another form of the legend, which deserves much
      more attention, is that which was embodied in an inscription upon what was said to be the
      tomb, in which the bones of Orpheus were buried, at Dium near Pydna, in Macedonia, which
      ascribed his death to the thunderbolts of Zeus :-- <quote xml:lang="grc" rend="blockquote"><l>Θρήϊκα χρυσολύρην τῇδʼ Ὀρφέα Μοῦσαι ἔθαφαν,</l><l>ὃν κτάνεν ὑψιμέδων Ζεὺς ψολόεντι βέλει.</l></quote></p><p>(Diog. Laert. <hi rend="ital">Prooem.</hi> 5; <bibl n="Paus. 9.30.5">Paus. 9.30.5</bibl> ;
       <hi rend="ital">Anth. Graec. Epig. Inc.</hi> No. 483; Brunck, <hi rend="ital">Anal.</hi> vol.
      iii. p. 253.)</p><p>After his death, according to the more common form of the legend, the Muses collected the
      fragments of his body, and buried them at Leibethra at the foot of Olympus, where the
      nightingale sang sweetly over his grave. The subsequent transference of his bones to Dium is
      evidently a local legend. (Paus. <hi rend="ital">l.c.</hi>) His head was thrown upon the
      Hebrus, down which it rolled to the sea, and was borne across to Lesbos, where the grave in
      which it was interred was shown at Antissa. His lyre was also said to have been carried to
      Lesbos; and both traditions are simply poetical expressions of the historical fact that Lesbos
      was the first great seat of the music of the lyre: indeed Antissa itself was the birth-place
      of Terpander, the earliest historical musician. (Phanocles, ap. Stob. <hi rend="ital">Tit.</hi> lxii. p. 399). The astronomers taught that the lyre of Orpheus was placed by Zeus
      anlong the stars, at the intercession of Apollo and the Muses (Eratosth. 24; Hygin. <hi rend="ital">Astr.</hi> 2.7; Manil. <hi rend="ital">Astron.</hi> 1.324).</p><p>In these legends there are some points which require but little explanation. The invention
      of music, in connection with the services of Apollo and the Muses, its first great application
      to the worship of the gods, which Orpheus is therefore said to have introduced, its power over
      the passions, and the importance which the Greeks attached to the knowledge of it, as
      intimately allied with the very existence of all social order,--are probably the chief
      elementary ideas of the whole legend. But then comes in one of the dark features of the Greek
      religion, in which the gods envy the advancement of man in knowledge and civilisation, and
      severely punish any one who transgresses the bounds assigned to humanity, as may be seen in
      the legend of Prometheus, and in the sudden death, or blindness, or other calamities of the
      early poets and musicians. In a later age, the conflict was no longer viewed as between the
      gods and man, but between the worshippers of different divinities; and especially between
      Apollo, the symbol of pure intellect, and Dionysus, the deity of the senses: hence Orpheus,
      the servant of Apollo, falls a victim to the jealousy of Dionysus, and the fury of his
      worshippers. There are, however, other points in the legend which are of the utmost
      difficulty, and which would require far more discussion than can be entered upon here. For
      these matters the reader is referred to Lobeck's <hi rend="ital">Aglaophamus,</hi>
      Müller's <hi rend="ital">Prolegomena zu einer wissenschaftlichen Mythologie,</hi> and
      Klausen's article in Ersch and Gruber's <hi rend="ital">Encyclopädie.</hi> Concerning the
      localities of the legend, see Miller's <hi rend="ital">Literature of Ancient Greece,</hi> p.
      26, and Klausen. The works of art representing Orpheus are enumerated by Klausen.</p><div><head>Orphic Societies and Mysteries.</head><p>All that part of the mythology of Orpheus which connects him with Dionysus must be
       considered as a later invention, quite irreconcilable with the original legends, in which he
       is the servant of Apollo and the Muses: the discrepancy extends even to the instrument of his
       music, which was always the lyre, and never the flute. It is almost hopeless to explain the
       transition. It is enough to remark here that, about the time of the first development of
       Greek philosoplly, societies were formed, which assumed the name of Orpheus, and which
       celebrated peculiar mysteries, quite different from those of Eleusis. They are thus described
       by Muüller (<hi rend="ital">Hist. Lit. Anc. Gr.</hi> p. 231.): --</p><p>"On the other hand there was a society of persons, who performed the rites of a mystical
       worship, but were not exclusively attached to a particular temple and festival, and who did
       not confine their notions to the initiated, but published them to others, and committed them
       to literary works. These were the <hi rend="ital">followers of Orpheus</hi> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">οἱ Ὀρφικυί</foreign>); that is to say, associations of pertons, who,
       under the [pretended] guidance of the <pb n="62"/> ancient mystical poet Orpheus, dedicated
       themselves to the worship of Bacchus, in which they hoped to find satisfaction for an ardent
       longing after the soothing and elevating influences of re ligion. The Dionysus, to whose
       worship the Orphic and Bacchic rites were annexed (<foreign xml:lang="grc">τὰ Ὀρφικὰ
        καλεόμενα καὶ Βακχικά</foreign>, <bibl n="Hdt. 2.81">Hdt. 2.81</bibl>), was the
       Chthonian deity, Dionysus Zagreus, closely connected with Demeter and Cora, who was the
       personitied expression, not only of the most rapturous pleasure, but also of a deep sorrow
       for the miseries of human life. The Orphic legends and poems related in great part to this
       Dionysus, who was combined, as an infernal deity, with Hades (a doctrine given by the
       philosopher Heracleitus as the opinion of a particular sect, ap. Clem. Alex. <hi rend="ital">Protrep.</hi> p. 30, Potter); and upon whom the Orphic theologers founded their hopes of
       the purification and ultimate immortality of the soul. But their mode of celebrating this
       worship was very different from the popular rites of Bacchus. The Orphic worshippers of
       Bacchus did not indulge in unrestrained pleasure and frantic enthusiasm, but rather aimed at
       an ascetic purity of life and manners. (See Lobeck, <hi rend="ital">Aglaoph.</hi> p. 244.)
       The followers of Orp heus, when they had tasted the mystic sacrificial feast of raw flesh
       torn front the ox of Dionysus (<foreign xml:lang="grc">ὠμοφαγία</foreign>), partook of no
       other animal food. They wore white linen garments, like Oriental and Egyptian priests, from
       whom, as Herodotus remarks (<hi rend="ital">l.c.</hi>), much may have been borrowed in the
       ritual of the Orphic worship."</p><p>Herodotus not only speaks of these rites as being Egyptian, but also Pythagorean in their
       character. The explanation of this is that the Pythagorean societies, after their expulsion
       from Magna Graecia, united themselves with the Orphic societies of the mother country, and of
       course greatly influenced their character. But before this time the Orphic system had been
       reduced to a definite form by <hi rend="smallcaps">PHERECYDES</hi> and <hi rend="smallcaps">ONOMACRITUS</hi>, who stand at the head of a series of writers, in whose works the Orphic
       theology was embodied; such as Cercops, Brontinus, Orpheus of Camarina, Orpheus of Croton,
       Arignote, Persinus of Miletus, Timocles of Syracuse, and Zopyrus of Heracleia or Tarentum
       (Müller, p. 235). Besides these associations there were also an obscure set of
       mystagogues derived from them, called Orpheotelests (<foreign xml:lang="grc">Ὀρφεοτελεσταί</foreign>), "who used to come before the doors of the rich, and promise to
       release them from their own sins and those of their forefathers, by sacrifices and expiatory
       songs; and they produced at this ceremony a heap of books of Orpheus and Musaeus, upon which
       they founded their promises" (Plat. <hi rend="ital">Ion,</hi> p. 536b.; Müller, p. 235).
       The nature of the Orphic theology, and the points of difference between it and that of Homer
       and Hesiod, are fully discussed by Müller (<hi rend="ital">Hist. Lit. Anc. Gr.</hi> pp.
       235-238) and Mr. Grote (vol. i. pp. 22, §c.) ; out most fully by Lobeck, in his <title xml:lang="la">Aglaophamus.</title></p></div><div><head>Orphic Literature.</head><p>We have seen that many poems ascribed to Orpheus were current as early as the time of the
       Peisistratids [<hi rend="smallcaps">ONOMACRITUS</hi>], and that they are often quoted by
       Plato. The allusions to them in later writers are very frequent ; for example, Pausanias
       speaks, of hymns of his, which he believed to be still preserved by the Lycolnidae (an
       Athenian family who seem to have been the chief priests of the Orphic worhip. as the
       Eumolpidae were of the Eleusinlian), and which, he says, were only inferior in beauty to the
       poetus of Homer, and held even in higher honour, on account of their divine subjects. He also
       speaks of them as very few in number, and as distinguished by great brevity of style (9.30.
       §§ 5, 6. s. 12).</p><p>Considering the slight acquaintance which the ancients evidently possessed with these
       works, it is somewhat surprising that certain extant poeins, which bear the name of Orpheus,
       should have been generally regarded by scholars, until a very recent period, as genuine, that
       is, as works more ancient than the Homeric poems, if not the productions of Orpheus himself.
       It is not worth while to repeat here the history of the controversy, which will be found in
       Bernhard and the other historians of Greek literature. The result is that it is now fully
       established that the bulkof these poems are the forgeries of Christian grammarians and
       philosophers of the Alexandrian school; but that along the fragments, which form apart of the
       collection, are some genuine remains of that Orphic poetry which was known to Plato, and
       which must be assigned to the period of Onomacritus, orperhaps a little earlier. The Orphic
       literature which, in this sense, we may call genuine, seems to have included <hi rend="ital">Hymns, a Theogony,</hi> an ancient poem called <hi rend="ital">Minyas</hi> or the
        <title>Descent into Hades</title>, <title>Oracles</title> and <title>Songs for
        Initiations</title> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">Τελεταί</foreign>), a collection of <hi rend="ital">Sacred Legends</hi> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἰεροὶ λόγοι</foreign>),
       ascribed to Cercops, and perhaps some other works. The apocryphal productions which have come
       down to us under the name of <hi rend="ital">Orphica,</hi> are the following:</p><div><head>1. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἀργοναυτικά</foreign></head><p>An epic poem in 1384 hexameters, giving an account of the expedition of the Argonauts,
        which is full of indications of its late date.</p></div><div><head>2. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ὕμνοι</foreign></head><p>Eighty-seven or eighty-eight hymns in hexameters, evidently the productions of the Nco
        Platonic school.</p></div><div><head>3. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Λιθικά</foreign></head><p>the best of the three apocryphal Orphic poems, which treats of properties of stones, both
        precious and common, and their uses in divination.</p></div><div><head>4. Fragments, chiefly of the <title>Theogony.</title></head><p>It is in this class that we find the genuine remains, above referred to, of the literature
        of the early Orphic theology, but intermingled with others of a mnch later date.</p></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Eschenbach, <hi rend="ital">Epigenes, de Poesi Orphica Commentarius,</hi> Norimb.
       1702-1704; Tiedemain, <hi rend="ital">Griechenlands erste Philosophen,</hi> Leipz. 1780; G.
       H. Bode, <hi rend="ital">de Orpheo Poetarum Graecorum antiquissimo,</hi> Goett. 1824; Lobeck,
        <hi rend="ital">Aglaophamus ;</hi> Bode, <hi rend="ital">Gesch. d. Hell. Dichtkunst,</hi>
       vols. i. ii.; Ulrici, <hi rend="ital">Gesch. d. Hellen. Dichtkunst,</hi> vols. i. ii.;
       Bernhardy, <hi rend="ital">Grudriss d. Griech. Litt.</hi> vol. ii. pp. 266, &amp;c.; Fabric.
        <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Graec. </hi>vol. i. pp. 140, &amp;c.; for a further list of writers on
       Orpheus, see Hoffmann, <hi rend="ital">Lexicon Bibliographicum Scriptorum
       Graecorum.</hi>)</p></div><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>The chief editions of Orpheus, after the early ones of 1517</bibl>,
       <bibl>1519</bibl>, <bibl>1540</bibl>, <bibl>1543</bibl>, <bibl>1566</bibl>, and
        <bibl>1606</bibl>, are those of <bibl>Eschenbach, Traj. ad Rhen. 1689, 12mo.</bibl>;
        <bibl>Gesner and Hanberger, Lips. 1764, 8vo.</bibl> and <bibl>Hermann, Lips. 1805, 8vo., by
        far the best</bibl>.</p><p>There are also small editions, chiefly for the use of schools, by <bibl>Schaefer, Lips.
        1818, 12mo.</bibl>, and in <bibl>the Tauchnitz Classics, 1824, 16mo.</bibl>
      </p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.P.S">P.S</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>