<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:O.orosius_paulus_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:O.orosius_paulus_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="O"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="orosius-paulus-bio-1" n="orosius_paulus_1"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Oro'sius</surname>,
        <forename full="yes">Paulus</forename></persName></label></head><p>a Spanish presbyter, a native, as we gather from his own words (<hi rend="ital">Histor.</hi>
      7.22), of Tarragona, flourished under Arcadius and Honorius. Having conceived a warm
      admiration for the character and talents of St. Augustine, he passed over into Africa about
       <date when-custom="413">A. D. 413</date>, in order that he might consult him upon the dogmas of the
      Priscillianists, which at that period were a source of great dissension in the churches of the
      Western peninsula. The bishop of Hippo flattered by the deep respect of this disciple, gave
      him a most cordial reception, and after imparting such instructions as he deemed most
      essential, despatched him to Syria in 414 or 415, ostensibly for the purpose of completing his
      theological education under St. Jerome, who was dwelling at Bethlehem, but in reality to
      counteract the influence and expose the principles of Pelagius, who had resided for some years
      in Palestine. Orosius having found a warm friend in Jerome, began to carry out the object of
      his mission by industriously spreading the intelligence that Coelestius had been condemned by
      the Carthaginian synod, impressing at the same time upon all the close connection which
      subsisted between this convicted heretic and Pelagius, against whom he at length brought a
      direct charge of false doctrine. The cause was formally heard before the tribunal of John,
      bishop of Jerusalem, and ended in the discomfiture of the accuser, who, having indulged in
      some disrespectful expressions towards the judge, was in turn denounced as a blasphemer. He
      remained in the East until he had ascertained the unfavourable result of the appeal to the
      council of Diospolis, after which, having obtained possession of the relics of St. Stephen,
      the protomartyr, the place of whose sepulture had not long before been marvellously revealed,
      he returned with them to Africa, and there, it is believed, died, but at what period is not
      known.</p><div><head>Works</head><div><head>Extant</head><div><head>I. <title xml:lang="la">Historiarum adversus Paganos Libri VII.,</title></head><p>dedicated to St. Augustine, at whose suggestion the task was undertaken. The gentiles of
         this age were wont to complain that the dishonour and ruin which had so long threatened the
         empire, and which had at length been consummated in the sack of Rome by Alaric and his
         Goths, must be ascribed to the wrath of the ancient deities, whose worship had been
         abandoned and whose altars had been profaned by the votaries of the new faith. In order to
         silence their clamour Orosius, upon his return from Palestine, composed this history to
         demonstrate that from the earliest epoch the world had been the scene of crimes not less
         revolting, and that men had groaned under calamities still more intolerable from war,
         pestilence, earthquakes, volcanoes, and the fury of the elements, while they could look
         forward to no happiness in a future state to console them for their miseries in the
         present. The annals, which extend from the Creation down to the year <date when-custom="417">A.
          D. 417</date>, are, with exception of the concluding portion, extracted from Justin,
         Eutropius <pb n="59"/> and inferior second-hand authorities, whose statements are rashly
         admitted and unskilfully combined, without any attempt to investigate the basis upon which
         they rest, or to reconcile their contradictions and inconsistencies. Although such a
         compilation might be held in high esteem in the fifth century, and might command the
         applause of the ecclesiastical biographers from Gennadius downwards, and even of some
         scholars of a later date, its defects could not escape the keen discernment of Sigonius,
         Lipsius, and Casaubon, who soon perceived that no original sources of information had been
         consulted, that the Greek writers had been altogether neglected, either through ignorance
         or indifference, and that the whole narrative so abounded with gross errors in facts and in
         chronology as to be almost totally destitute of utility, since no dependence can be placed
         on the accuracy of those representations which refer to events not elsewhere chronicled.
         The style which has been pronounced by sonic impartial critics not devoid of elegance, is
         evidently formed upon the two great models of the Ciristian eloquence of Africa, Tertullian
         and Cyprian. Among the various titles exhibitet by the MSS., such as, <title xml:lang="la">Historia adversus Paganorum Calumnias; De Cladibus et Miseriis Mundi,</title> and the
         like, one, which has proved a most puzzling enigma, appears under the varying forms, <hi rend="ital">Hormesta,</hi> or <hi rend="ital">Ormesta,</hi> or <hi rend="ital">Ormista,</hi> sometimes with the addition, <hi rend="ital">id est miseriarum Christiani
          temporis.</hi> Among a multitude of solutions, mIany of them altogether ridiculous, the
         most plausible is that which adoptillg <hi rend="ital">Ormista</hi> as the true orthography
         supposes it to be a compound of <hi rend="ital">Or. m. ist.</hi>--an abbreviation for <hi rend="ital">Orosii mundi historia.</hi></p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>The Editio Princeps of the <title xml:lang="la">Historia</title> was printed at
           Vienna, by J. Schüssler, fol. 1471</bibl>, and presents a text derived from an
          excellent MS. <bibl>Another very early impression is that published at Vicenza, in small
           folio, without a date, by Herm. de Colonia, and from this the Venice editions of 1483,
           1484, 1499, and 1500, appear to have been copied.</bibl> The only really good edition is
          that of Havercamp, Lug. Bat. 4to. 1738, prepared with great industry, and containing a
          mass of valuable illustrations.</p></div><div><head>Translations</head><p><bibl>A translation into Anglo-Saxon was executed by Alfred the Great, of which a
           specimen was published by Elstob at Oxford in 1690</bibl>, and <bibl>the whole work
           accompanied by a version of the Anglo-Saxon text into English appeared at London, 4vo.
           1773</bibl>, under the inspection of Daines Barrington and John Reinhold Foster. There
          are old translations into Gerlman and Italian also; <bibl>into the former by Hieronymus
           Bonerus, fol. Colmar, 1539, frequently reprinted</bibl>; into the latter by Giov. Guerini
          Da Lanciza, without date or name of place, but apparently belonging to the sixteenth
          century.</p></div></div><div><head>II. <foreign xml:lang="grc">λιβερ απολογετιξυς δε αλβιτριι
         λιβερτατε</foreign></head><p>written ten in Palestine, <date when-custom="415">A. D. 415</date>. Orosius, having been
         anathematised by John of Jerusalem as one who maintained that man could not, even by the
         aid of OGod, fulfil the divine law, published this tract with the double object of proving
         the injustice of the charge and of defending his own proceedings by demonstrating the fatal
         tendency of the tenets inculcated by Pelagius. By some oversight on the part of a
         transcriber, seventeen chapters of the <title xml:lang="la">De Natura et Gratia</title>, by
         Augustine, have been inserted in this piece, a mistake which has led to no small
         confusion.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>The Apologeticus was first printed at Loavain, 8vo. 1558, along with the epistle
           of Jerome against Pelagius</bibl>, and <bibl>will be found also in the <title xml:lang="la">Bibliotheca Patrum Max.</title> Lugdun. 1677, vol. vi.</bibl>; it is
          appended to the edition of the Historiae by Havercamp, land is included in Harduin's
          collection of Councils, vol. i. p. 200.</p></div></div><div><head>III. <title xml:lang="la">Commonitorium ad Augustinum,</title></head><p>The earliest of the works of Orosius, composed soon after his first arrival in Africa,
         for the purpose of explaining the state of religious parties in Spain, especially in
         reference to the commotions excited by the Priscillianists cillianists and Origenists. It
         is usually attached to the reply, by Augustine, entitled <title xml:lang="la">Contra
          Priscillianistas et Origenistas Liber ad Orosium,</title> vol. viii. ed. Boned.</p></div><div><head><title xml:lang="la">Epistolae ad Augustinum</title></head><p>Some <title xml:lang="la">Epistolae ad Augustinum</title> appear to have been at one time
         in existence, but are now lost.</p></div></div><div><head>Other works ascribed to Orosius</head><p>The following productions have been commonly ascribed to Orosius.</p><div><head>1. <title xml:lang="la">Dialogus sexaginta quinque Quaestionum Orosii percontantis et
          Augustini respondentis,</title></head><p>found among the works of Augustine.</p></div><div><head>2. <title xml:lang="la">Quaestiones de Trinitate et aliis Scripturae Sacrae Locis ad
          Augustinum</title></head><p>printed along with <title xml:lang="la">Augustini Responsio,</title> at Paris, in
         1533.</p></div><div><head>3. <title xml:lang="la">Commentarium in Criticum Canticorum,</title></head><p>attributed by Trithemius to Orosius, but in reality belonging to Honorius
         Augustodunelsis.</p></div><div><head>4. The <title xml:lang="la">De Ratione Animae,</title></head><p>mentioned by Trithemius, supposed by many to be a spurious treatise, is in reality the
          <title xml:lang="la">Commonitorium</title> under a different title.</p></div></div><div><head>Editions</head><p>No complete edition of the collected works has yet appeared.</p></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Augustin. <hi rend="ital">de Ratione Anim. ad Hieron. ;</hi> Gennad. <hi rend="ital">de
        Viris Illustr.</hi> 39. 46 ; Trithem. <hi rend="ital">de Script. Eccles.</hi> 121; Nic.
       Anton. <title xml:lang="la">Bibl. Hispan. Vet.</title> 3.1; G. J. Voss. <hi rend="ital">de
        Historicis Lat.</hi> 2.14; Schönemann, <title xml:lang="la">Bibl. Patr. Lat.</title>
       vol. 2.10; Bähr, <title xml:lang="la">Geschichte der Römischen Litterat.</title>
       § 238 ; suppl. band. 2te Abtheil. § 141; D. G. Moller, <title xml:lang="la">Dissertatio de Paulo Orosio,</title> 4to. Altorf. 1689 ; Voss. <title xml:lang="la">Histor.
        Pelag.</title> 1.17; Sigonius, <hi rend="ital">de Historicis Rom.</hi> 3; Lips. <title xml:lang="la">Comment. in Tacit. Ann. ;</title> Casaubon, bon, <hi rend="ital">de Rebus
        Sacris,</hi> &amp;100.1.12, especially Mörner, <title xml:lang="la">De Orosii Vita
        ejusque Historiarum Libris septem adversus Paganos,</title> Berol, 1844.</p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.W.R">W.R</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>