<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:O.onomarchus_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:O.onomarchus_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="O"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="onomarchus-bio-1" n="onomarchus_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Onomarchus</surname></persName></head><p>(<persName xml:lang="grc"><surname full="yes">Ὀνόμαρχος</surname></persName>), general of the
      Phocians in the Sacred War, was brother of Philomeins and son of Theotimnus (<bibl n="Diod. 16.56">Diod. 16.56</bibl>, <bibl n="Diod. 16.61">61</bibl> ; <bibl n="Paus. 10.2.2">Paus. 10.2.2</bibl>; but see Arist. <hi rend="ital">Pol.</hi> 5.4, and <pb n="31"/>
      Thirlwall's <hi rend="ital">Greece,</hi> vol. v. p. 275, not.). He commanded a division of the
      Phocian army under Philomelus, in the action at Tithorea, in which the latter perished; and
      after the battle gathered together the remains of the Phocian army, with which he effected his
      retreat to Delphi. An assembly of the people was now held, in which Onomarchus strongly urged
      the prosecution of the war, in opposition to the counsels of the more moderate party, and
      succeeded in obtaining his own nomination to the chief command in the place of Philomelus,
       <date when-custom="-353">B. C. 353</date>. He was, however, far from imitating the moderation of
      his predecessor: he confiscated the property of all those who were opposed to him, and
      squandered without scruple the sacred treasures of Delphi. The latter enabled him not only to
      assemble and maintain a large body of mercenary troops, but to spend large sums in bribing
      many of the leading persons in the hostile states; by which means he succeeded in prevailing
      on the Thessalians to abandon their allies, and take up a neutral position. Thus freed from
      his most formidable antagonists, he was more than a match for his remaining foes. He now
      invaded Locris, took the town of Thronium, and compelled that of Amphissa to submit; ravaged
      the Dorian Tetrapolis, and then turned his arms against Boeotia, where he took Orchomenus and
      laid siege to Chaeroneia, but was compelled to retreat without effecting anything more. His
      assistance was now requested by Lycophron, tyrant of Pherae, who was attacked by Philip, king
      of Macedonia ; and he at first sent his brother Phayllus into Thessaly with an army of 7000
      men. But Phayllus having been defeated by Philip, Onomarchus marched with his whole forces to
      the support of Lycophron, defeated Philip in two successive battles, and drove him out of
      Thessaly. He next turned his arms a second time against the Boeotians, whom he defeated in a
      battle, and took the city of Coroneia, when he was recalled once more to the assistance of
      Lycophron, against Philip, who had again invaded Thessaly. Onomarchus hastened to support his
      ally with an army of 20.000 foot and 500 horse, but was met by Philip at the head of a force
      still more numerous, and a pitched battle ensued, in which the superiority of the Thessalian
      cavalry decided the victory in favour of the king. Onomarchus himself, with many of the
      fugitives, plunged into the sea in hopes to reach by swimming the Athenian ships under Chares,
      which were lying off the shore, but perished in the waves, or, according to Pausanias, by the
      darts of his own soldiers. His body fell into the hands of Philip, who caused it to be
      crucified, as a punishment for his sacrilege. His death took place in <date when-custom="-352">B. C.
       352</date> (<bibl n="Diod. 16.31">Diod. 16.31</bibl>_<bibl n="Diod. 16.33">33</bibl>, <bibl n="Diod. 16.35">35</bibl>, <bibl n="Diod. 16.56">56</bibl>, <bibl n="Diod. 16.61">61</bibl>;
       <bibl n="Paus. 10.2.5">Paus. 10.2.5</bibl> ; <bibl n="Just. 8.1">Just. 8.1</bibl>, <bibl n="Just. 8.2">2</bibl>; <bibl n="Polyaen. 2.38">Polyaen. 2.38</bibl>; Ephorus, fr. 153, ed.
      Didot; <bibl n="Oros. 3.12">Oros. 3.12</bibl>; Wesseling, <hi rend="ital"> ad Diod.</hi>
      16.35; Dem. <hi rend="ital">de Fals. Leg.</hi> p. 443). We are told that Onomarchus was a man
      of luxurious habits, and that he made use of the sacred treasures, not only for the purposes
      of the state, but to minister to his own pleasures (Theopomp. apud <hi rend="ital">Athen.</hi>
      xiii. p. 605); but it is difficult to know what value to attach to such statements; the
      religious character assumed by the enemies of the Phocians having led them to load with
      obloquy the memory of all the leaders of that people. </p><byline>[<ref target="author.E.H.B">E.H.B</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>