<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:O.olophernes_2</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:O.olophernes_2</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="O"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="olophernes-bio-2" n="olophernes_2"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Olophernes</surname></persName></head><p>2. One of the two supposititious sons whom Antiochis at first imposed upon her husband,
      Ariarathes IV., king of Cappadocia. On the birth, however, of a real son, named Mithridates
      (afterwards Ariarathes V.), Olophernes, that he might not set up pretensions to the throne,
      was sent away into Ionia, where he does not appear to have improved his morals. When
      Ariarathes V. refused to marrv the sister of Demetrius Soter, the latter supported the claims
      of Olophernes to the crown of Cappadocia. Olophernes, however, entered into a conspiracy with
      the people of Antioch to dethrone Demetrius, who, having discovered the design, threw him into
      chains, but spared his life that he might still keep Arilrathes in alarm with his pretensions.
      In <date when-custom="-157">B. C. 157</date>, when Ariarathes had been deposed, and had fled to
      Romle, Olophernes sent thither two unscrupulous ambassadors (Timothens and Diogenes) to join
      the emissaries of Demetrius in opposing his (so called) brother. According to Appian the
      Romans decided that the two claimants should share the throne between them. We are told,
      however, that Olophernes did not hold the kingdom long, and that his reign was signalized by a
      departure from the more simple customs of his ancestors, and by the introduction of systematic
      debauchery, like that of the Ionians. To supply his lavish extravagance, he oppressed and
      pillaged his subjeets. putting many to death, and coltiscatihlln their property. Four
      houndired talents he deposited with the citizens of Priene, and these they afterwards restored
      to him. We read also that, when his affairs were on the decline, and he became alarmed lest
      his soldiers should mutiny, if their arrears remained unpaid, he plundered a very ancient
      temple of Zeus, to which great sanctity was attached, to enable him to satisfy their demands.
      (Diod. <hi rend="ital">Eel.</hi> 3, <hi rend="ital">Exc. de Virt. et Vit.</hi> p. 588,
      &amp;c.; Phot. <hi rend="ital">l.c. ;</hi>
      <bibl n="Plb. 32.20">Plb. 32.20</bibl>; <bibl n="App. Syr. 8.47">App. Syr. 47</bibl>; Liv. <hi rend="ital">EpLi.</hi> xlvii.; <bibl n="Just. 35.1">Just. 35.1</bibl>; <bibl n="Ath. 10.440">Athen. 10.440</bibl>b; Dalecilamp and Casaub. <hi rend="ital">ad loc. ;</hi>
      <bibl n="Ael. VH 2.41">Ael. VH 2.41</bibl>; see above, Vol. I. p. 284.) </p><byline>[<ref target="author.E.E">E.E</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>